User talk:Whatismyname2000

Bring it to the talk page

You would need to bring the Djokovic greatness issue to the talk page to gauge consensus there. He is already described as the greatest by many on his article, but there are several others that have that same status, including Rod Laver. Other sports pages may be swarmed with super-fans that keep it at something that belongs at a water cooler, not an encyclopedia. Personally I'd go with Laver and Chamberlain but that's a fun silly conversation to have with friends, not really here. Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:33, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fine... But Chamberlain!? Come on man. Russell is greater🙂 Whatismyname2000 (talk) 10:37, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Serbia men's national basketball team, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 01:31, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You want to block me!? Why? What is disruptive about my contribution. Medals won by players and coaches are facts. I have provided relevant sources for other claims. What is non-objective here? Whatismyname2000 (talk) 06:58, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Whatismyname2000! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Marko Miljanov several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Marko Miljanov, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:34, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain to me why you deleted the fact that Marko Miljanov was a Serb who happened to live in Montenegro? The video I posted as proof of my claim proves unequivocally that the Kuči collectively as a tribe feel like Serbs. For them, "Montenegrian" is not a national affiliation but a regional one. According to the Kuči tribe, Montenegrins are Serbs like Venetians are Italians. Whatismyname2000 (talk) 15:42, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, you are confusing ethnicity with nationality. English word "nationality" has a different meaning than the Serbo-Croatian word "nacionalnost". I do not dispute that Miljanov was ethnically Serb, that is clear. But, the WP:lead section and the WP:infobox should contain nationality, not ethnicity, see WP:ETHNICITY for more info. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:47, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand. What you are talking about is citizenship. Not nationality. Marko Miljanov's nationality is Serbian and he is an ethnic Serb. His citizenship is Montenegrin because he lives in Montenegro. Should the part of the page you are talking about include nationality or citizenship? In the first case, it should be written that Marko Miljanov is a Serbian. In the second case, a Montenegrian. Whatismyname2000 (talk) 15:57, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Did you even bother to read the nationality article, or are you just giving your opinion on what "nationality" should mean? Vanjagenije (talk) 21:02, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Моје мишљење? Националност подразумева припадност нацији. Држављанство припадност држави. То је мишљење? Националност човека чију страницу узалудно мењам је Србин. Држављанство је црногорско. Whatismyname2000 (talk) 21:24, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Нема одговора? Whatismyname2000 (talk) 06:53, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Grandmaster (chess). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Remsense ‥ 论 06:29, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hungarian Chess Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Csaba Horváth. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Referred to WP:ANI for violating WP:3RR at Grandmaster (chess)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Quale (talk) 17:15, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Grandmaster (chess)) for a period of 1 month for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:17, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Svetozar Gligorić

Hello Whatismyname2000! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Svetozar Gligorić, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.chessgames.com/player/svetozar_gligoric.html, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA 4.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Svetozar Gligorić and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Svetozar Gligorić, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Svetozar Gligorić. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 4.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Svetozar Gligorić with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Svetozar Gligorić saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:34, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How long does it take to read a few paragraphs? What are you doing all this time? Whatismyname2000 (talk) 08:04, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you do not realize that I live in Canada? It is now 6:52 AM in my time zone. So what have I been doing? Since I posted my last message, I went to the gym, had supper, watched the hockey game, and went to bed.

I have now checked your amendments to the article and it's not ready yet so I have restored the copyvio template. You can use Earwig's tool to detect what remains to be done. Thanks. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:05, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. No hard feelings. I thought you were European. Didn't pay attention to the maple leaf😅. Whatismyname2000 (talk) 13:17, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me know when it's ready for another check. I will be doing some real-life tasks today so please be patient if I don't show up here in a timely fashion!

Cheers, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:17, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think I'm done. If something else needs to be changed, just tell me to what percentage I have to lower the matching of the two texts. And I wouldn't even mention anything if I knew how many time zones separate us. Whenever you find time to check this I'm fine with that. Greetings🙂 Whatismyname2000 (talk) 15:52, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't actually go by percentrages, but I look at individual phrases and see what improvements need to be made. The current version is okay. Thanks for taking the time to get this fixed. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:06, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

👍 Whatismyname2000 (talk) 20:17, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]