User talk:ThantBhoneHtet1123

Welcome!

A cartoon centipede reads books and types on a laptop. — The Wikipede and the Picture Tutorial. *(image credit)*

Welcome!

Hello, ThantBhoneHtet1123, and welcome to Wikipedia! I have noticed that you are fairly new! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. I also see that some of your recent edits, such as the ones to the page Margery Wentworth, show an interest in the use of images and/or photos on Wikipedia.

Did you know that ...

...Wikipedia has a very stringent image use policy?
...most images from Flickr, online news websites, and other web sources are copyrighted?
...Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously?
...freely-licensed images should be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, a central location for images where they can be used on all Wikipedia projects?
...we recommend that new users use our "files for upload" process – at least until you get the hang of things?

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 10mmsocket (talk) 08:00, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Hello, I'm Gbawden. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Margery Wentworth have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Gbawden (talk) 13:52, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Elizabeth of Portugal, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. AntientNestor (talk) 16:21, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Katherine Parr

Parr's date of birth is not known. Please stop adding one (unless, of course, there's a new reliable source to justify it). Don't forget an edit summary—it's a great help to other contributors. Thanks.--AntientNestor (talk) 14:11, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Anne Boleyn, you may be blocked from editing. AntientNestor (talk) 14:36, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at George Boleyn, Viscount Rochford. AntientNestor (talk) 16:55, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ThantBhoneHtet1123! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Remsense ‥ 论 14:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Mary Boleyn, you may be blocked from editing. AntientNestor (talk) 12:59, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce incorrect information to Wikipedia, as you did at Anne Boleyn, you may be blocked from editing. AntientNestor (talk) 13:14, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jane Seymour. Jessicapierce (talk) 17:07, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Margery Wentworth. Jessicapierce (talk) 17:07, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Catherine of Aragon. Jessicapierce (talk) 17:07, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. AntientNestor (talk) 13:35, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Celia Homeford (talk) 14:09, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Christopher Columbus. Please stop changing dates on historical biographies. You are getting them wrong. 'Between' does not mean 'around'. 'Before or in' does not mean 'about'. Your changes are unnatural and uncited. It is disruptive to continue making these changes after they have been reverted many times on several articles and it has been explained to you on talk pages and in edit summaries why they are wrong. Celia Homeford (talk) 13:11, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Celia Homeford (talk) 12:39, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing from certain namespaces ((Article)) for a period of 24 hours for failure to communicate. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:09, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You've been blocked from article space until you respond to the complaints. You should reply at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#ThantBhoneHtet1123. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:10, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are blocked for a further week because you're still doing the same thing[1]. Walsingham's birth year is not known. His age at death cannot be known for sure. DrKay (talk) 08:31, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Special:Contributions/116.206.193.34 while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Celia Homeford (talk) 14:46, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to be the contributor of these edits as well. If so, this is WP:BLOCKEVASION.--AntientNestor (talk) 15:39, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@AntientNestor @Celia Homeford Hi, I believe the same user is currently making edits under this IP Special:Contributions/116.206.193.43 Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 07:27, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Persuasive. AntientNestor (talk) 08:23, 8 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2025 Myanmar earthquake, you may be blocked from editing. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 06:52, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2025 Myanmar earthquake. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Scoria (talk) 13:00, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You need to actually stop with these unnecessary edits lately. If those changes have been reverted before it's smart not to repeat them don't you think Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 02:13, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Newslinger talk 09:01, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, you have been blocked for not acknowledging the warnings posted on this page, and for editing while logged out (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ThantBhoneHtet1123 for details). If you would like to continue editing Wikipedia, please carefully read and review all of the messages posted on this page and all of the pages linked in those messages, then submit an unblock request explaining how your edits violated Wikipedia policies and guidelines, and what changes you would make to prevent your future edits from doing the same. — Newslinger talk 09:07, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]