Jump to content

User talk:Suffusion of Yellow

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

HAPPY HOLIDAYS 2023

[edit]

Question

[edit]

Why did you trigger edit filter? I trying to raise awareness for erradication of gender roles, forced erradication at that. 216.145.66.231 (talk) 02:18, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is about this attempted edit, I assume? Wikipedia aspires to the neutral point of view. If you think something is idiotic or evil, you're entitled to your opinion, but an encyclopedia article is not the place to share it. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 23:53, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry for using Wikipedia for it, I don't use social media. Wikipedia is like the only way I can spread awareness and make it go viral. Poe.com now says "I'm sorry, but I do not feel comfortable" when asking it many of the questions I could before. Reddit abandons me. 216.145.66.231 (talk) 14:56, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with you about the bs gender role stuff, and I feel as strongly as you do, but, Wikipedia isn't social media, you can't "spread awareness" and have things "go viral". This is an encyclopedia, it's just a repository of information that's not meant to have opinions attached to it. Kjvfiyguhoircpioruv (talk) 07:34, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

[edit]
Precious
Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:17, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 25

[edit]

FilterDebugger requests

[edit]

Would it be possible to import recent changes from multiple users and IP addresses at the same time? Similarly, would it be possible to have a checkbox to also import deleted edits? Thanks for all of your hard work on these scripts. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 23:38, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If I can add another request here, it would be awesome if it was possible to see user-defined variables. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:53, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Quinlan: Not tested very well, but try switching to User:Suffusion of Yellow/FilterDebugger.dev.js. Instead of adding more vars to the dropdown menu, I added a more flexible "expression" option. Basically a second "mini-filter" that's run after the first, re-using the variables. So just plain myvar should give you contents of myvar but you can also do ccnorm(myvar), "test" rlike myvar, etc. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 02:38, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Quinlan: Also  Done to both, also on the .dev branch. Separate multiple users, titles, or filter log ids with with pipes. I could only test importing deleted revisions on testwiki, of course, but hopefully it will work here. And I probably introduced a few new bugs. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 00:49, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much. I've been heavily using the development version recently. The expression option has been helpful already. It allows variables to be defined using semicolons, but I don't suppose it would be possible to allow the input box to expand for multiple lines? Some expressions get a little long. I'll test out the multiple user support soon.
I am seeing some cases where the filter stops working properly (especially the results panel on the lower right) after changing the input several times and you have to completely reload the page to get it to work again, but I don't have any more specifics on when it happens at this point. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:13, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at this article...

[edit]

recent attacks on [1] by that chuck-LTA. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 02:13, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll send an email shortly to another EFM, and also, this user hasn't edited in at least two weeks. Codename Noreste 🤔 Talk 02:25, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Batch Test Plus config

[edit]

Hey there! I'm a big fan of your AbuseFilter scripts, I use them on my home wiki :). I noticed the buttons "FP check" and "FN check" of Batch Test Plus are disabled by default outside of enwiki. As I understand, that's because "FP check" requires a random sample filter. I was wondering, though, why "FN check" is also disabled by default. Do you think it could be enabled, or is there a way I could override that config on my common.js without forking your script? Thank you! --Titore (talk) 22:55, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, fyi, the filter doesn't seem to currently catch things like User :Example, so you might want to adapt the filter. (Another wiki decided to import the filter recently, and was wondering why it didn't catch certain (abusive) edits). 1234qwer1234qwer4 14:46, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RFA2024 update: Discussion-only period now open for review

[edit]

Hi there! The trial of the RfA discussion-only period passed at WP:RFA2024 has concluded, and after open discussion, the RfC is now considering whether to retain, modify, or discontinue it. You are invited to participate at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase II/Discussion-only period. Cheers, and happy editing! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Came across a pattern of behavior, possible LTA?

[edit]

I remember previously coming across editing where the person was adding specific age at time of death to multiple historical BIO articles, and adding specific order of office or occurrences to infoboxes. It seems so familiar but I can't quite pin down where I saw this before. I ran an Editor Interaction Utility on 2 editors and came up with a commonality of First Lady articles. But anyway, does this pattern of behavior ring any possible LTA filter bells for you? - Shearonink (talk) 19:21, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back!

[edit]

Nice to see you're still around. Nobody (talk) 06:20, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@1AmNobody24: Ugh. Thanks for the thought, but I'm not really around much, as you can see. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 19:09, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can trim down filter 1248 again

[edit]

Hi, hope you are doing well.
In that archived EFN I had asked(I was that IPv4) for this filter to be changed because mobile app changes were using manual hashtag(#) summaries instead of using tags, it appears that since August, according to the linked task, the mobile apps now all use tags, so the patch (diff) can now be reverted :). – 2804:F1...DF:61D4 (::/32) (talk) 19:23, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks,  Done. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 19:22, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 26

[edit]

FilterDebugger issue

[edit]

Hi Suffusion of Yellow. I'm experiencing an issue with the .fdb-batch-results pane the last week or two. After loading the page, the pane is empty until you make a change to the filter. The issue is very consistent on both Firefox and Safari. It also happens when I am logged out with no other user scripts loaded. Thanks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:51, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Quinlan: I could semi-reproduce this while logged out. I was getting an error about the now-removed mw.Uri() and some of the results were missing. I think this should have fixed it. Let me know if you still have problems. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 21:30, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It seems to be fixed! Thanks! Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:57, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit filter on BLP Crime

[edit]

Thanks for your reply at Edit filter/False positives/Reports. That makes perfect sense, and I appreciate you taking the time to explain. Just to be clear, I wasn't so much worried that someone would complain about my edit, but that I had – inadvertently – actually done something wrong with the article. Very good to be reassured on that count. On the plus side: Had to read about Richard Jewell to understand your reference, so, you know, everything's educational! AukusRuckus (talk) 11:53, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FilterDebugger question

[edit]

Hi SoY, I'm wondering why this isn't recognised as a match. Could you take a look? Thanks Nobody (talk) 09:32, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Special:AbuseFilter/examine/log/23149595 shows no match either. All of the lazy-load variables, including added_lines, are missing, possibly because of phab:T176291 or a related bug. FilterDebugger doesn't try to generate any missing variables from AbuseLog hits; it only generates everything "from scratch" when viewing recentchanges, etc. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 16:29, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think time could also be a reason why it doesn't show. If I run the Debugger against all hits from filter 702, all the non matches are before 3 February 2019. Not sure if anything relevant changed in the code around that time. Edit: It does look like that phab ticket was right around that time, culprit found I'd say. Nobody (talk) 17:28, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]