User talk:SpinnerLaserzthe2nd/Archives 1

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, SpinnerLaserzthe2nd

Thank you for creating Traditional French musical instruments.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nicer work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:58, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:FranceFlagNote

Template:FranceFlagNote has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:24, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Delicious Party Pretty Cure

{{subst:Taggednote-NPF|1=Delicious Party Pretty Cure|2=Whiteguru|3=In the case of animated films, reliable sources must confirm that the film is clearly out of the pre-production process, meaning that the final animation frames are actively being drawn and/or rendered, and final recordings of voice-overs and music have commenced. See [[WP:NFF] and supply appropriate references. Else, the article goes to draft as TOOSOON}}

Whiteguru (talk) 04:41, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of heads of government of monarchies for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of heads of government of monarchies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of heads of government of monarchies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mccapra (talk) 21:39, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Federal republic

added a link pointing to Christian Schmidt

Parliamentary republic

added a link pointing to Christian Schmidt

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of heads of government of republics for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of heads of government of republics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of heads of government of republics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mccapra (talk) 20:58, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of heads of government of republics, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 21:24, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Western Togoland Rebellion

Please see note on Talk:Western Togoland Rebellion | WP:NPOV. I feel there are problems with this article. Feel free to correct me if I am wrong.--Natsubee (talk) 04:12, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HugPreCure.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HugPreCure.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:45, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Symbols of Ontario

Template:Symbols of Ontario has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 10:21, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Symbols of Quebec

Template:Symbols of Quebec has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 10:21, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of French flags

Why do you arrange some sections in a strange order and reduce the pictures to a barely visible size? 213.192.68.53 08:50 3 February 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.192.68.53 (talk)

Check the List of United Kingdom flags for example. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 08:56, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have put the order of better organized and clearer lists at the beginning of the alphabet, the U K list also needs to be corrected. I still do not understand in what criteria you set the order of some sections — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.192.68.53 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 10:32, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Usually, a flag list article should go in numerical order for the years when a historical one was first adopted. Just ask anyone who has an interest of flags. Do you study flags or something? Wikipedia strongly recommends that you create an account. Once you create one, you can add infoboxes to show on who you are. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 10:35, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I set it up from the most recent to the historical, because current is more important. Your system is a non-intuitive mess. Why little pictures are better? After all, pictures are the most important in such an article. (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 10:32, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I only arrange the historical ones only from the first documented ones to the recently distablushed (e.g. the Betty Ross flag to the 1959-1960 US flag). If you read a flag book and you'll see that the order went from the historical ones to the recent ones. It is better for you to open an account as it is strongly recommended by many users. Everyone in the vexillology community uses that system. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 10:15, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Songs about Estonia

A tag has been placed on Category:Songs about Estonia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:12, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Comparative air force enlisted ranks of the Francophonie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Comparative air force enlisted ranks of the Francophonie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparative air force enlisted ranks of the Francophonie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fram (talk) 11:30, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2022 Winter Olympics marketing‎, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 19:05, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are you even joking about this? SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 19:11, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you add unsourced *and* poorly sourced content (for instance perhaps you tried to use Sina, Visit Beijinag, or Xinhua) to 2022 Winter Olympics marketing‎? Because if you did then this is not a joke. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 19:41, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Firestar464 (talk) 02:07, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:World Archery flag.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:World Archery flag.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:2022 American Samoa Winter Olympic team

Template:2022 American Samoa Winter Olympic team has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:14, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ryan Leong for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryan Leong is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Leong until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:25, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pan American Games. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:32, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The designs of the medals were made in 2015, I removed them as they may violate Canadian copyright laws. I removed them because the designs were uploaded in Wikimedia Commons. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 04:41, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons is a place to upload images to be used on Wikipedia. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:53, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Osterrönfeld (Amt) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Osterrönfeld (Amt), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 20:27, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inquiry about edit in Tripiṭaka

Hello and good day. I would like to ask some things about your edit here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tripi%E1%B9%ADaka&diff=next&oldid=1070464572

I was wondering if you have a source that says it is indeed "tatlo mga kahon". And why did you remove the Italian entry? --Likhasik (talk) 11:34, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mangang

@SpinnerLaserzthe2nd:Pangals don't have 7 clans system. King Khagemba gave some surnames to some migrants Muslim settled in Manipur who married Meetei women. But Muslims or Pangals don't have salai. Your contributions is misleading information to the general public. Afingba Mangang (talk) 03:11, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]