User talk:Seasider53/Archive 8

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

ITN recognition for Kevin Campbell (footballer)

On 19 June 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Kevin Campbell (footballer), which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 10:47, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Alicia Keys: Rehearsal Room for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alicia Keys: Rehearsal Room is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alicia Keys: Rehearsal Room until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:07, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Category:Religious buildings and structures in Yarmouth, Maine has been nominated for deletion

Category:Religious buildings and structures in Yarmouth, Maine has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 17:31, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Why did you remove my addition to the Stand By Me page?

I don't know how to add references, but in my edit explanation I wrote where the proof is so someone who knows how to add references could add them. Here's further proof of the truth of my addition: https://kenisu3000.blogspot.com/2022/05/encyclopedia-mother-making-mother-tv.html?m=1 On that page, hit Ctrl F and search "stand by me" to find proof of the inspiration. 208.77.56.242 (talk) 23:56, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

A blog is not a WP:RELIABLE SOURCE. Please read the policy. Seasider53 (talk) 00:00, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

It's a translation of an official book, which IS a reliable source. 208.77.56.242 (talk) 00:35, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

That isn't a sufficient reference. Seasider53 (talk) 00:50, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Thanks for your work with Wikipedia! Keep up the great work! ComputerHawk (talk) 20:44, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

One City Center (Portland, ME)

As I said in my revertion of your revertion, I go there personally for my chiropractor and I know for a fact that it's the official website of that building so it is not spam. the link is not inappropriate because it is the official current link for the business, not an archive link of a website that no longer exists. There are plenty of examples of Wikipedia pages using the current business's, organization's or building's website. Specifically in Portland, ME, here's the most similar example is Chestnut Street Methodist Church (Portland, Maine). As you can see in the external links section, it's the restaurant's website that's housed there, not an archive website of the church that used to be there. More examples are Porteous, Mitchell and Braun Company Building where it's not an archive of the company but the website of the college that is there now, United States Marine Hospital (Portland, Maine) where it's not an archive of the marine hospital but the website of a completely different hospital (not even a successor) that has a location there, and finally Agora Grand Event Center where it doesn't show an archive of the church but the event company's website that's currently there. I could go on and on but I hope you get the point now. GamerKlim9716 (talk) 14:54, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

It's a commercial link showing rental prices of properties. Please desist. Seasider53 (talk) 15:24, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Yes, it's the company that owns the building but you'll keep reverting my reverts so I give up 🤷‍♂️ GamerKlim9716 (talk) 15:32, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

If you're going to remove that site, you should also remove the site here in the info box because it's a commercial website showing prices of properties. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Casco?wprov=sfti1# GamerKlim9716 (talk) 15:37, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

If you don't remove the website in the info box for The Casco since it's the exact same thing, the company that owns the building and is a (in your words) "commercial link showing prices of properties", then it's not fair and I'm adding my edit back. GamerKlim9716 (talk) 15:46, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Problem solved. Seasider53 (talk) 15:49, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Cool. You should delete the restaurant's (that's housed in the building) website for Chestnut Street Methodist Church (Portland, Maine) since it's a commercial site with prices for food. I can help you find some more Maine historic article's external links to mess up if you would like. GamerKlim9716 (talk) 16:00, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

No need to be salty; it's making you appear as though you've been caught out. Seasider53 (talk) 16:27, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

I agree that I shouldn't be salty. I apologize. I know this isn't the place to say this but I wanted to explain myself. I'm going through a mental health crisis (PTSD) and am not thinking straight and taking out on people unfortunately. GamerKlim9716 (talk) 16:55, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Mentioning Justin Knapp's ban

Hello, I reverted your changes on Justin Knapp based on prior discussions on the article's talk page, including Talk:Justin Knapp#Block and Talk:Justin Knapp#Extensive block history. I don't think mentioning that he is banned complies with WP:UNDUE and WP:NOR. Let me know if you have further questions, or feel free to open another thread at Talk:Justin Knapp if you believe the curcumstances have changed. Ian P. Tetriss (talk) 01:43, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Train Sim World, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Milton Keynes railway station.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Jimmy Carr's kids

Hello - I have just added a talk section to Jimmy's page - he DEF has 2 kids. I've put some info in that Talk (don't know if you will get notified of it). :o) Comedy Nerd77 (talk) 10:00, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

You unjustifiably removed my verifiable addition to the Stand By Me (film) page

You claimed an English translation of an official Japanese book was not a legitimate source despite that very book being used as a legitimate source for a lot of information on the Mother (video game) page. Explain yourself. My addition was verifiable with an official source, which you claimed was not valid, and yet elsewhere on Wikipedia that very source is considered valid. 208.77.56.242 (talk) 00:36, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Why did you revert me?

Why? Justanothercopyeditor (talk) 03:44, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Train Sim World 4.webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Train Sim World 4.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

River Arts District

Thanks. I was afraid of running into the paywall and I had difficulty telling which article was which on the web site. I think ProQuest may have different wording becaise the web site articles are always getting updated.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 23:06, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Reversion of External Links

Hello, I would like to understand why you considered the reference to two of the most important websites related to John Muir was considered "spam." As I explained in the rationale for adding these sites as External Links for the entry on John Muir, the omission of a link to John Muir Exhibit website seems to be a major oversight, as that site is considered by numerous scholars the largest repository of writings about John Muir, cited by dozens of published books, and even seen by the University of the Pacific John Muir Papers (which is included) as an important resources. Similarly, the link to the John Muir Global Network, a portal to websites featuring Muir around the world, seems too important to omit, given that Wikipedia is intended to incorporate more than just "original" sources but to cite to "what others are saying about the topic" at hand, in this case John Muir. These are not just some random sites, but rather sites that have been devoted the the topic for many decades, and frequently referenced in scholarly articles. Thanks. Muirpower (talk) 23:43, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

October 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Hadlock Field. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. User:Namiba 19:08, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Review your Edit

you should review your last edit in the Kabaddi page. proper citation included. Tamil Selvan34 (talk) 05:57, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

I share the same concerns regarding the quality (and apparent activism) behind this user’s edits. I am similarly concerned with this user’s consistent disregard for citing source materials. This user appear to be a non-native speaker of English, with more enthusiasm than their intelligence can extend to. 75.161.56.205 (talk) 20:41, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

I reported them, but there was a backlog that day, so the request was deleted by a bot. Will report again if needed. Seasider53 (talk) 20:43, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Northern Premier Cricket League logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Northern Premier Cricket League logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Preston and Wyre Joint Railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Preston.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Northeast Harbor

Trying to add to the Notable People section and the Amenities section. Looks like took the changes down. I am new and want to learn the right way to do things. Can you give me some guidance? Everything in there was accurate. Thanks PhillyObessed24 (talk) 13:13, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

Templating vandals

You probably already know about Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace and/or Twinkle's warn function, but they're really helpful when dealing with vandalism. They offer clear explanations for good-faith editors, and are a requirement for WP:AIV. They can also discourage vandals - in this case I'm referring to edits at Kieran McKenna. Thanks - FifthFive (talk) 23:27, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Seasons Greetings!

File:Statues of Three Wise Men in the Philippines 06.jpg

Hello there, 'tis the season again, believe it or not, the years pass so quickly now! A big thank you for all of your contributions to Wikipedia in 2024! Wishing you a Very Merry Christmas and here's to a happy and productive 2025! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:04, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Sorry

I have the source in my hand but in different language. It is an official hard copy CD with liner notes MVCJ-19012 Argo 613 Moody`s Mood For Love. Not "poor source" at all, at least as I read it. I retract my information. I see you get attacked often by other posters. Sorry for your troubles. Have a good holiday. Longwing Seagull (talk) 12:44, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Royal River Conservation Trust.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Royal River Conservation Trust.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 09:13, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 January 15 § Murder in YYYY

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 January 15 § Murder in YYYY on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 16:33, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Reverted captions

Dear Seasider53,

I have noticed that every time I make an edit on a movie article regarding who the poster artist is, you revert it, despite the fact I include a citation. I must respectfully ask that you stop doing this. The pages you’ve done this on include Shock Treatment, Field of Dreams, Dragnet (1987 film), Harry and the Hendersons, Who Framed Roger Rabbit, Death Valley (1982 film), Swamp Thing (1982 film), and, if I recall correctly, a few video games.

With all due respect, I don’t know why you are undoing my edits, and must I ask you to revert them to how I had them and then stop erasing my work.

I wish you the best of luck in future edits,

The Denton Dossier. The Denton Dossier (talk) 02:54, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

You don’t need to know who I am in order to stop doing things you’ve been asked to not do. Have a read of Wikipedia’s guidelines if you need assistance. Seasider53 (talk) 02:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the response. Let’s remain formal, shall we?

Would you please point me to the guidelines that explain how my edits were improper?

Sincerly,

The Denton Dossier. The Denton Dossier (talk) 03:17, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Bitter Hun

Is what you are. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:4B00:D005:6100:B163:207E:D48E:1C22 (talk) 17:49, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:16th century in York

A tag has been placed on Category:16th century in York indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:32, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Do we have a problem here?

You undid a good deal of the work I did on the page for Shock Treatment with no explanation. It wasn’t just a poster caption- all the character descriptions i added, too.

Seriously, why do you think that what I am doing qualifies as “vandalism.” It clearly isn’t. Point me to the rule that says it is.

You were also extremely unprofessional in your reply to the message I sent you. You said “You don’t need to know who I am”. Uh… I’m not trying to find out your identity. I’m just sending you a message.

Please stop undoing my work for no reason.

Sincerly,

The Denton Dossier. The Denton Dossier (talk) 21:17, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Yesterday I added the following information to Paul Young:

He has an older brother and a younger sister. As a youth, after school, he played football for the Vauxhall Motors factory where he worked. In his spare time, he played in several bands as a bass guitarist.

The cited reference was this webpage: [1].

Turning to the page, the website says this:

Paul Antony Young was born January 17th 1956. He was the middle child of three, has an elder brother Mark and a younger sister Joanne. His interest in music dates back to when he was very young, when he learnt to play the piano and then the guitar. On leaving school he worked with his father for Vauxhall Motors and played in various bands at night. He played Bass guitar in his first band but always wanted, and eventually managed, to become the singer. These were lean times musically because his preferred style of music, Soul, was not particularly popular. However he managed to sing in local bands such as Kat Kool & The Kool Kats and later in the better known Streetband.

Do you have an issue with this source? 156.61.250.249 (talk) 14:13, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Yes, as with all fan sites used as references, especially for a biography of a living person. See WP:BLP. Seasider53 (talk) 15:24, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

That wasn't a fan site but the official site, and it was already used in the article, which you left in place. Both here and in the above discussion with User:The Denton Dossier, you seem way too aggressive, assuming bad faith, leaving vandal warnings when no vandalism happened. Please be more constructive and factual in your criticisms, and less overbearing in your reverts. Fram (talk) 15:56, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Any fan site can be published with an “official” title. It doesn’t mean it’s legit. I’m “aggressive” because I’m faced with editors on a daily basis who don’t want to learn the dos and don’ts of Wikipedia. Seasider53 (talk) 16:21, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

"Any fan site can be published with an “official” title." Yes, but this is the official Paul Young website, not a fan site. And if you are incorrectly reverting and leaving undeserved vandalism warnings and so on, then you need to take a break from either the specific task you are doing (e.g. recent changes patrolling) or Wikipedia as a whole, as it seems to be burning you out. No editor should be treated worse because you have encountered too many other editors who don't want to learn. Every good faith editor (and these two have all the indications of being good faith editors) should get a "fresh" look, not one troubled by too many bad faith editors. Fram (talk) 16:35, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

The webarchive links are not the official website. The same URL, yes, but it appears to be a fan site which was made into an official one. Seasider53 (talk) 16:47, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Do you have any evidence that the site which says "PAUL YOUNG OFFICIAL WEBSITE" and which is at the same address as the current official site was then not the official site but a fan site? Fram (talk) 17:00, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

your problem with me?

many of the edits i make are reverted by you for no reason. you give no explanation and it looks like you do this to other people too. your user talk page is filled with people questioning your weird unnecessary reverts. please stop, or at least give reason for why you do it instead of just saying nothing and acting all strange-like. i'm not even sure you have anything to do with the pages i edit, it seems you just stalk what i edit and revert things because you want to. anyway, have a nice day and please get back to me so we can resolve this. Cherryblossomgirly (talk) 21:47, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Yeah. I'm not the only editor reverting your edits. Seasider53 (talk) 21:50, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

of course you're not the only person who reverts edits i make. but that's not a good reason to stalk my account and actively revert most things i do. anyone else who reverts my edits usually does it for good reason and at least has the decency to tell me why they did it. you on the other hand seem like you're just looking for conflict. because why wouldn't you tell me why you reverted them? answer me that. i'm also not the only person you do this to. your ENTIRE talk page is filled with people like me who are confused at why you do what you do. Cherryblossomgirly (talk) 22:42, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

I'm adding to this as i was warned by a admin for "edit-warring" with this person about a tiny thing on a article and yet he has never gotten a single warning. Xirosaturn (talk) 19:19, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 February 27 § Category:Commercial buildings completed in 1585

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 February 27 § Category:Commercial buildings completed in 1585 on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 14:23, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Help with TCD article

Hi Sea, can please help make Trinity College Dublin page a GA article? Good Article attempt is going on. I putted many good improvement too. Do you know other Dublin specialist editors, who maybe also help? SeanBeans1981 (talk) 17:24, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

The European Destubathon

You are invited to participate in The European Destubathon in April. Almost $3000 in Amazon voucher prizes which can be used to buy books for content, though it can also be treated as an editathon if you're not interested in competing! Minimum content to be added to each article just to ensure that they're over a stub, though longer expansions also welcome. Entries at the end of the contest will be tipped into the 50,000 Destubbing Challenge and European Challenge/20,000 Challenge for UK and Ireland entries. Previous contests were really enjoyable and I'm hoping this one will be too! Sign up if interested. Thanks! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:22, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Richard Dennis Arnold, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page March to the Sea.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Solomon

A link was provided to Solomon's full name, I think I may have got caught up in some vandalism. https://www.freebmd.org.uk/cgi/information.pl?scan=1&r=284446821:4403&d=bmd_1740370513 2A0A:EF40:382:8801:284C:4B59:28E4:ADC7 (talk) 20:34, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

Substack

Hi Seasider53, I'm not sure if you saw it, but I responded to your question on the Substack talk page here. I hope that clarifies the changes that I made. If you think that they are valid, would you mind implementing them? I'm happy to answer any other questions if you have them.

Thank you, LS4Substack (talk) 14:42, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

Andrei Kanchelskis article

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Seasider53 (talk) 23:57, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

I've tried reasoning with this person, i have posted sourced evidence on their talk page, they deleted it, they don't care, they're not reading it, they don't want to engage.Rcclh (talk) 00:44, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Who are you referring to, since you’ve put this addendum on both talk pages? Seasider53 (talk) 05:40, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Sorry I just copied it over to ensure you would see it. I am referring to ItsKesha. I have tried engaging but they just revert. I put a source page proving my point on their page they deleted it. I created a new paragraph as a gesture of compromise that acknowledged the intention of the original paragraph whilst removing the untruth, it was deleted. I'm fully aware it is a trivial piece of information, but it's false, and if you allow one falsehood to stand, you allow another, and then eventually wikipedia turns into a work of fiction. That's why i'm persuing it.

It's such an easy to prove falsehood. It's not as though historic football squads are hidden away and hard to find niche subjects, its blatantly obvious. Rcclh (talk) 12:19, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

I see you've now made exactly the same revert that i made three times and got a block warning from you!. :-) Anyway thank you for removing the false information and case closed as far as i'm concerned. Rcclh (talk) 22:32, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

I hope you don’t mind me joining in a private conversation. First of all, I think that ItsKesha should also be given a warning for edit-warring. Their behaviour is little different from Rcclh. Secondly, it seems to me that Rcclh is probably correct and that the article used as a source is not reliable. There were far more than 11 non-British Isles players in the First Division in 1991. As this sentence is not terribly important and unreliably sourced, I suggest that the sentence beginning “At the time, Kanchelskis was a rarity” should simply be deleted. We can then move on. Daemonickangaroo2018 (talk) 09:31, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

You removed Rcclh's edit, though...? If we can get more than one reference for the claim, then it might be worthy of inclusion. As it stands, I don't believe so. Seasider53 (talk) 11:18, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your intervention. To be clear, the issue is that I want to see the falsehood (11 non-British Isles players) removed. The piece I inserted in its place was merely a compromise to try to placate ItsKesha so I am quite happy for my piece to be removed, as long as the false information is not restored Rcclh (talk) 12:20, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

I've just noticed @Seasider53 has threatened to block me if i remove the “At the time, Kanchelskis was a rarity” paragraph again so could you do this for me please so we can, as you say, move on. Thank you. Rcclh (talk) 21:09, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Beacon St. edit

Hello. Today I added a fact about Beacon St. in Boston, and it appears you deleted it. Why? Localrunner (talk) 18:06, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

For the reason I gave in the edit summary. Seasider53 (talk) 19:29, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Harraseeket Inn logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Harraseeket Inn logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Editing Ichigo Kurosaki Wikipedia pave

Ichigo Kurosaki and Uryu Ishida aren't cousins. Do not vandalize Ichigo Kurosaki's wikipedia page again. Aaaaaap78 (talk) 22:41, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

Why did you create an account to post here but you're vandalising articles while logged out? Seasider53 (talk) 22:58, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Von Trapp Brewing logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Von Trapp Brewing logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

Thanks

For this.

They've done the same on a number of articles, and this is the second time in 12 hours they've done so. I hope this doesn't result in needing to go to AN3. In the meantime, they reverted a number of other pages in a similar fashion. If you're able to take a look that'd be fantastic. See: 1 2 3, and yesterday 4 5 6.

Thanks! Iknowyoureadog (talk) 18:23, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Hey

Hey, why did you revert my Mount edit? Please keep it it is a helpful contribution 2A02:C7C:75A8:C300:D836:E00:507A:601E (talk) 15:14, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Michael Caine

Your previous contribution to the discussion included "...retired English..." is less offensive to me than "...former English...", etc., which I've had cause to see too often. I'm happy with the change.. You may wish to further contribute to clarify that your position on this has changed. Barry Wom (talk) 08:10, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Your reversions are independent of my viewpoint. Seasider53 (talk) 08:14, 25 April 2025 (UTC)