Jump to content

User talk:Robertsky/Archive 12

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12Archive 13

Question from Oogly2 (04:04, 12 August 2025)

I just loaded a new article on the Songs of Love Foundation into my sandbox. My understanding is that someone is going to read this before posting. Is this correct?

What are my next steps?

Many thanks, Sharon --Oogly2 (talk) 04:04, 12 August 2025 (UTC)

@Oogly2 I have inserted the Articles for Creation template for draft submission. A reviewer will read and review the draft. A couple of things though:
  • WP:INLINE inline citation is preferred.
  • A quick read, the draft seems promotional
  • Are you writing about the person or the organisation? Choose one and focus on the topic.
  • The references though without links seems to be of primary sources, i.e. interviews.
– robertsky (talk) 05:36, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for responding! Sorry if I am asking so many questions. I'm new at this. So this has been submitted?
Also, what is WP: INLINE? How does it sound promotional?
I guess I can focus on the Songs of Love Foundation. I was trying to explain how it came to be through the efforts of John Beltzer who single-handed created the organization. I thought his back story was interesting.
Finally, can you explain what you mean about the references without links. I'm confused.
Again thanks very much for your help. Oogly2 (talk) 02:27, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
@Oogly2,
Yes, I have submitted for you, but unforunately, a reviewer has gotten back with exactly what I thought would be the response.
  • WP:INLINE - this is an essay about having inline citations. Rather than having the reference at the end of the article, place the reference at the end of the paragraph or sentence that the reference is supporting with, <ref>your reference here</ref>.
  • It sounds promotional because it contains words or phrases that are frivolous and statements that may be contentious, i.e. Songs of Love Foundation has grown remarkably in scope and impact. Remarkable? How so? Who said so? Families and hospital staff have reported that these songs help alleviate fear, pain, and anxiety during medical treatments. Any sources to support this assertion? (This is where inline citations would help to clarify). Media Coverage and Public Recognition section is entirely promotional. For a highly profiled organisation, the articles written in the mentioned publications would be more useful as a source. The Music Industry Support paragraph can be utilised to show that it enjoyed support from the musicians in general, of course with sources.
It also sounds promotional because you try to cramp in two subjects into one article. On biography vs organisation profile, if the organisation has a more notable presence than Beltzer, a short paragraph summarising the genesis or reasoning by Beltzer is sufficient.
  • As for references, while not compulsory, but it is preferred that there are links to the sources where possible, i.e. “Songs of Love: Non-profit Helping Sick Kids Cope Through Personalized Songs,” Henriquez, Gloria. Global News Canada (April 25, 2017) (Canadian video segment and article featuring John Beltzer and a patient working on a song of love together.) can be found at https://globalnews.ca/news/3404026/songs-of-love-non-profit-helping-sick-kids-cope-through-personalized-songs/. This makes verifications of the content by other editors and readers easier.
– robertsky (talk) 03:58, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

Question from Monu Jayram Mandal (10:15, 13 August 2025)

I am interested in topics related to domestic workers, housekeeping services, and labour laws in India. --Monu Jayram Mandal (talk) 10:15, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

Invitation to Singapore August 2025 meetup

Hello,

It is August 2025!

At Wikimania 2025 in Nairobi, Kenya, User:Robertsky was recognised as the Wikimedian of the Year. Known for his kindness, dedication and willingness to help others, Robert embodies the spirit of the Wikimedia movement. Read more at diff blog about his journey as an editor and seven other Wikimedians identified for their contributions to the movement.

Our next meetup is taking place at Bistro8@Foch Road on 16 August 2025, 12:00 PM - 3:00 PM. It will be a lunch meetup. Full details and the registration form can be found at Event:Singapore Meetup August 2025. Some topics of discussion will be Wikimania 2025, and future plans for Wikimedia Singapore. We’d love to see you there!

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.

Warm regards,

– robertsky (talk) 02:05, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

Page move grammar

Hello, I believe this new title you implemented [1] is ungrammatical.

If the family name was Smith, the article wouldn't be titled "Killing of Smith children".

"Al-Najjar family bombing/killing" would be better I think. IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 23:18, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unknown152438 (talkcontribs)

Question from Amyshumann1893226 (22:13, 25 July 2025)

Amyshumann1893226 (talk) 22:13, 25 July 2025 ()

Tech News: 2025-34

MediaWiki message delivery 00:34, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Diligent Librarian Barnstar
For exemplary service at the Resource Exchange, tirelessly delivering the reliable sources on which this encyclopedia depends, please accept this award. :) Thank you for your help in accessing The Story of Tun Perak. There's no doubt you deserve the Wikimedian of the Year award! —Ganesha811 (talk) 11:17, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

Question from JamesOB12 (20:57, 19 August 2025)

Hi Robert, I am new to this so have started with a couple of articles where I’ve found a gap on things I know about. One is on native North America - a renowned anthropologist and the other fly fishing - an iconic reel. The one on the fishing reel I published directly but the other on the anthropologist is going through review (it’s been 5 weeks). Would you recommend one route over the other for future articles? Many thanks --JamesOB12 (talk) 20:57, 19 August 2025 (UTC)

New pages patrol September 2025 Backlog drive

September 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 September 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:32, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

Question from CookieMonster135 on Igor Rybakov (20:06, 24 August 2025)

Hi, How do I create a citation? And what are they for? --CookieMonster135 (talk) 20:07, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

@CookieMonster135, please see this help page for the instructions on how to create a citation. Citations are to help other editors and readers to verify that the statements you write are supported with sources of information. – robertsky (talk) 20:14, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
thank you! CookieMonster135 (talk) 20:18, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-35

MediaWiki message delivery 00:09, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Question from Zimbatech6213ports62 (15:21, 26 August 2025)

Hello how do I create and upload information in Wikipedia --Zimbatech6213ports62 (talk) 15:21, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-36

MediaWiki message delivery 20:46, 1 September 2025 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2025).

Administrator changes

readded Euryalus
removed

Interface administrator changes

readded Ragesoss

CheckUser changes

readded AmandaNP
removed SQL

Oversight changes

readded AmandaNP

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC is open on whether use of emojis with no encyclopedic value in mainspace and draftspace (e.g., at the start of paragraphs or in place of bullet points) should be added as a criterion under G15.

Technical news

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case Article titles and capitalisation 2 has been closed.
  • An RfC is in progress to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the Arbitration Committee election and resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diligence
A belated congratulations on your Wikimedian of the Year 2025 award! Optakeover(U)(T)(C) 11:16, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 September 2025

Tech News: 2025-37

MediaWiki message delivery 01:11, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

Question from AkinUgurAktas (23:26, 11 September 2025)

how to do citation good --AkinUgurAktas (talk) 23:26, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

Question from STEMSupport (00:52, 14 September 2025)

I created a user name that is not the name of the article of information. Does the user name have to be what anyone interested in this has to use? --STEMSupport (talk) 00:52, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

@STEMSupport username does not matter to the content. – robertsky (talk) 00:44, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

Question from STEMSupport (19:29, 14 September 2025)

Hi Rober, I uploaded an article about Broadcom Foundation and want to know when to expect it to publiish? --STEMSupport (talk) 19:29, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

@STEMSupport I have moved your article to Draft:Broadcom Foundation where it is better placed for improvements and reviews to be made. Third party references are required to establish the notability of subject. Submitting it as it is would be declined by reviewers. – robertsky (talk) 00:47, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-38

MediaWiki message delivery 17:03, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

Question for new user

Hi, I am a fairly new user and was wondering how I can easily identify and revert vandalism? ie. how to find it

Thanks, Pr0m37h3u$ 11:48, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

Re: Singapore August 2025 Invite

Congratulations on your well earned Wikimedian of the Year award and I'm really sorry for the tardy response. Getting Wikimania 2023 organised was such a massive effort that I don't know how I'd manage if I had to do it myself! If there's anything about Wikimedia Singapore you'd like to discuss, please free free to send me an email. Congratulations again, - Mailer Diablo 02:45, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 70

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 70, July–August 2025
  • New collections:
    • Times of Malta
    • Africa Intelligence
    • Intelligence Online
    • La Lettre
    • Glitz
  • Spotlight: Wikimania
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 13:16, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

(This message was sent to User:Robertsky and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Question from SGI Education (16:59, 21 September 2025)

How ca i edit --SGI Education (talk) 16:59, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

Question from SGI Education (16:59, 21 September 2025) (2)

How can i edit --SGI Education (talk) 16:59, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

Question from BarbaraGilleran (17:47, 21 September 2025)

Hi Robert Nice to virtually meet you. I'm a total novice but I'd love to continue to update the page about my home parish of Kilteevan. I've got some additional information I can add to the existing Kilteevan page about the locality and history. I have access to a book that has been published about the area and know the author of the book. Can I add in information based on that but ensuring I cite the book/author. Thank you! Barbara --BarbaraGilleran (talk) 17:47, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-39

MediaWiki message delivery 22:52, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

Question from Pogue Canuck on 4 × 100 metres relay (06:01, 21 September 2025)

Hello. I believe the list of the top 10 fastest 4x100 m men's relay times is incorrect. Didn't Canada win Olympic Gold in Paris with a time of 37.50s? --Pogue Canuck (talk) 06:01, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

@Pogue Canuck, Is there a source for this? – robertsky (talk) 17:02, 21 September 2025 (UTC)
here is the link to the official Olympic results page for the 2024 Paris final:
There are many other omissions & mistakes in the wikipedia top 10 list & it is bad need for updating & corrections.
With the redults of Sunday's world championship final & the US claiming gold in 37.29s & Canada the silver in 37.55s, here are 2 more times to include in the list.
Finally, why is a time b the US team subsequently negated by a doping violation included in the list at all?
King regards Pogue Canuck (talk) 23:39, 23 September 2025 (UTC)
www.olympics.com/en/olympic-games/paris-2024/results/athletics/men-4-x-100m-relay&ved=2ahUKEwiRqvOKg_CPAxVuCnkGHSr0IjEQFnoECBsQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3GRahFIECUL3bGo10j7OpQ Pogue Canuck (talk) 23:40, 23 September 2025 (UTC)
here is the official site for World Athletics where you can find the official top lists all-time for each event:
https://worldathletics.org/records/all-time-toplists/ Pogue Canuck (talk) 23:55, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

Question from Chili cat23 (07:34, 27 September 2025)

Hello! I was wondering if you knew how to create a Wikipedia page or can I not do that because i'm new? --Chili cat23 (talk) 07:34, 27 September 2025 (UTC)

@Chili cat23 you need to have 10 edits and be here for 4 days to create pages. See WP:AUTOCONFIRM. I have added a talk page message with links to tutorials and stuff to get you started and familiarized with editing on Wikipedia. – robertsky (talk) 08:06, 27 September 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-40

MediaWiki message delivery 20:48, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

Question from Ai666794 (23:53, 29 September 2025)

i LOVE dinosaurs so i want to edit innacurate pages pls help --Ai666794 (talk) 23:53, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

@Ai666794 I have seen your edits. They are not ok in the sense that those remove sourced content and are likely your personal opinion, and may be seen as vandalistic or disruptive edits. Wikipedia is not for you to telling your opinions. If you have any content that are backed by third party, independent, and reliable sources, go ahead and edit. I have dropped some links on your talk page. Hopefully those can get you started on editing on Wikipedia correctly. – robertsky (talk) 02:48, 30 September 2025 (UTC)

Okay

That was stupid of me. As in reality I do want edit inaccurate pop culture pages Ai666794 (talk) 10:20, 30 September 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 October 2025

Survey

Hi and thanks for your recent participation in AfD. I would like to hear your thoughts about the process. Please check this survey if you are willing to respond.Czarking0 (talk) 02:19, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-41

MediaWiki message delivery 17:19, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Tang Liang Hong

On 7 October 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Tang Liang Hong, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede66 04:24, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – October 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2025).

Administrator changes

removed

CheckUser changes

removed Vanamonde93

Arbitration

  • After a motion, arbitration enforcement page protections no longer need to be logged in the AELOG. A bot now automatically posts protections at WP:AELOG/P. To facilitate this bot, protection summaries must include a link to the relevant CT page (e.g. [[WP:CT/BLP]]), and you will receive talk page reminders if you forget to specify the contentious topic but otherwise indicate it is an AE action.

Hello, is it possible to please protect the page for at least a month or till the completion of the show. There has been many disruptive edits since the protection ended. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.160.131.74 (talk) 11:07, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Generally the protection period is incremental. I am not familiar with Bigg Boss seasons to determine outright if a long protection is required. I suggest putting the request at WP:RFPP for other admins to determine as well. – robertsky (talk) 16:45, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Question from Jackal Walker (14:28, 9 October 2025)

how do i create a citation or notes and make it able to be searched in browsers --Jackal Walker (talk) 14:28, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Question from Jackal Walker (14:26, 9 October 2025)

hello --Jackal Walker (talk) 14:26, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

@Jackal Walker hello. I have drop some information on your talk page! Welcome to Wikipedia, if you further questions feel free to ask. – robertsky (talk) 14:29, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-42

MediaWiki message delivery 18:56, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Question from FootballerTalentID (11:02, 15 October 2025)

How can I write a biography about young up and coming african footballers? --FootballerTalentID (talk) 11:02, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

@FootballerTalentID, As long as they are considered notable per Wikipedia's standards, you can write about them. See WP:NSPORTS for details. – robertsky (talk) 11:06, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

Question about a double standard

Hi Robertsky, Wikipedia has assigned you as my mentor and I would greatly appreciate your advice on this dicussion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Trevor_Chan_(2nd_nomination)

Thank you very much! Fact2Hound (talk) 20:12, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

@Fact2Hound Thank you for reaching out.
AfD discussions are about the subject and whether the subject has met the notability standards by itself. While there may appear to be a double standard when other similarly written articles exists, it is not really that.
Articles that do not meet notability standards may slip through the review cycles over time as we constantly have backlogs of new articles created (think in thousands article in the backlog each day), or that they were created when the notability standards for the subjects were not as stringent when they were written on as now and have been grandfathered in. Either way, when such articles are brought to attention to active volunteer editors, they may be nominated for deletion as well. Every subject has to be evaluated on its own notabtility. Hence, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, as an advice, dissuades you from comparing with other articles.
For an effective discussion, I would suggest that you state your points and leave the discussion as it is without replying to other comments individually unless a reply is warranted in the sense that there are new points to be raised. If the article is eventually deleted, it does not mean that the subject will be removed and not allowed ever to have an article here. Over time, there maybe more significant coverage of the subject which may substantiate their notability. – robertsky (talk) 02:21, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your detailed explanation!
I have another question if you don't mind answering it as well:
I noticed that this is the second time the article received AfD. The first instance is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Trevor_Chan
If someone submits a request for "article for deletion" for a wikipedia article with the reason of not being notable, and it was declined, can that person or someone else submit another request for "article for deletion" for the same reason again and again, trying their luck, wishing that the ones joining the discussion will favor their stand next time?
Are there any Wikipedia policies governing this?
Also, would you please provide a link to the Wikipedia guideline about "If the article is eventually deleted, it does not mean that the subject will be removed and not allowed ever to have an article here."
Thanks a lot for your help! Fact2Hound (talk) 13:14, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
@Fact2Hound there is nothing against having succssive nominations, especially if the earlier one(s) end with no consensus as it usually means that the notability of the subject is a borderline yes/no case. If you are suggesting that the second nomination here is made in bad faith, I don't see that happening. The second nomination comes years after the first and as I have said, the notability question was unresolved in the first.
As for my statement above, what I meant to say is that if the article is removed, there is no issue in the future if another one is written in the future as one may still be able to gain sufficient notability over time. However, do not recreate if there is not much of a substantial activity from the subject. If it is determined that there is no material change or improvement from the deleted article, the replacement article maybe speedily deleted and eventually the title may be salted. – robertsky (talk) 13:40, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Got it. Thanks! Fact2Hound (talk) 13:51, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-43

MediaWiki message delivery 19:32, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 October 2025

  • Traffic report: One click after another
    Serial-killer miniseries, deceased scientist, government shutdowns and Sandalwood hit "Kantara" crowd the tubes.

Question from Athleticgenius 123 (17:10, 24 October 2025)

Greetings,

Hope you're doing well! I'm quite a young person on wikipedia.Will this site help me prepare for tests and all? Also, could I like prepare an article or something on this site since I am signing up for the School Newspaper?

Regards, Athleticgenius(not my real name) --Athleticgenius 123 (talk) 17:10, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

@Athleticgenius 123 The resources on Wikipedia should be used with a pinch of salt as anyone can edit here. Not everyone is a subject matter expert here. However, you can always make use of ther references in the subjects to further read into the subjects you are interested. If you would like to contribute on Wikipedia, I suggest that you start with the suggested edits module on your Homepage, with small edits such as adding references or linking pages together, then progressively more complex edits. When you are comfortable editing and are more familiar with the community here, you can start writing new articles that meets Wikipedia's notability standards. I have dropped some links on your user talk page to tutorials and resources as well for you to go through. – robertsky (talk) 17:29, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Everybody (Britney Spears song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Everybody (Britney Spears song), which you previously marked as reviewed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Everybody (Britney Spears song) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcomed to contribute to the discussion.SodiumBot (botop|talk) 13:45, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

These updates are delivered by SodiumBot. To opt out of these messages, add {{User:SodiumBot/NoNPPDelivery}} to your talk page.

Tech News: 2025-44

MediaWiki message delivery 19:28, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Notice

The article Jagaddhatri (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TWODABS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:30, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

The redirect Next Israeli election has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 30 § Next Israeli election redirects until a consensus is reached. Information Note: Multiple related redirects are bundled in this discussion. —Myceteae🍄‍🟫 (talk) 23:25, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

Guide to temporary accounts

Hello, Robertsky. This message is being sent to remind you of significant upcoming changes regarding logged-out editing.

Starting 4 November, logged-out editors will no longer have their IP address publicly displayed. Instead, they will have a temporary account (TA) associated with their edits. Users with some extended rights like administrators and CheckUsers, as well as users with the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right will still be able to reveal temporary users' IP addresses and all contributions made by temporary accounts from a specific IP address or range.

How do temporary accounts work?

Editing from a temporary account
  • When a logged-out user completes an edit or a logged action for the first time, a cookie will be set in this user's browser and a temporary account tied with this cookie will be automatically created for them. This account's name will follow the pattern: ~2025-12345-67 (a tilde, year of creation, a number split into units of 5).
  • All subsequent actions by the temporary account user will be attributed to this username. The cookie will expire 90 days after its creation. As long as it exists, all edits made from this device will be attributed to this temporary account. It will be the same account even if the IP address changes, unless the user clears their cookies or uses a different device or web browser.
  • A record of the IP address used at the time of each edit will be stored for 90 days after the edit. Users with the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right will be able to see the underlying IP addresses.
  • As a measure against vandalism, there are two limitations on the creation of temporary accounts:
    • There has to be a minimum of 10 minutes between subsequent temporary account creations from the same IP (or /64 range in case of IPv6).
    • There can be a maximum of 6 temporary accounts created from an IP (or /64 range) within a period of 24 hours.

Temporary account IP viewer user right

How to enable IP Reveal

Impact for administrators

  • It will be possible to block many abusers by just blocking their temporary accounts. A blocked person won't be able to create new temporary accounts quickly if the admin selects the autoblock option.
  • It will still be possible to block an IP address or IP range.
  • Temporary accounts will not be retroactively applied to contributions made before the deployment. On Special:Contributions, you will be able to see existing IP user contributions, but not new contributions made by temporary accounts on that IP address. Instead, you should use Special:IPContributions for this (see a video about IPContributions in a gallery below).

Rules about IP information disclosure

  • Publicizing an IP address gained through TAIV access is generally not allowed (e.g. ~2025-12345-67 previously edited as 192.0.2.1 or ~2025-12345-67's IP address is 192.0.2.1).
  • Publicly linking a TA to another TA is allowed if "reasonably believed to be necessary". (e.g. ~2025-12345-67 and ~2025-12345-68 are likely the same person, so I am counting their reverts together toward 3RR, but not Hey ~2025-12345-68, you did some good editing as ~2025-12345-67)
  • See Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer § What can and can't be said for more detailed guidelines.

Useful tools for patrollers

  • It is possible to view if a user has opted-in to view temporary account IPs via the User Info card, available in Preferences → Appearance → Advanced options → Tick Enable the user info card
    • This feature also makes it possible for anyone to see the approximate count of temporary accounts active on the same IP address range.
  • Special:IPContributions allows viewing all edits and temporary accounts connected to a specific IP address or IP range.
  • Similarly, Special:GlobalContributions supports global search for a given temporary account's activity.
  • The auto-reveal feature (see video below) allows users with the right permissions to automatically reveal all IP addresses for a limited time window.

Videos

Further information and discussion

Most of this message was written by Mz7 (source). Thanks, 🎃 SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 02:47, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Anniversary Robertsky 🎉

Hey @Robertsky. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 19 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey. :) -❙❚❚❙❙ GnOeee ❚❙❚❙❙ 07:51, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Question from Loula ama on NotebookLM (21:21, 31 October 2025)

مرحبا --Loula ama (talk) 21:21, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-45

MediaWiki message delivery 19:31, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2025).

Administrator changes

added Toadspike
removed

CheckUser changes

added asilvering

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Question from Barodaian (07:43, 9 November 2025)

Hello! I was just interested in asking if correcting grammar mistakes is okay. I have found an end quote without a defined start quote. --Barodaian (talk) 07:43, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

@Barodaian yes. correcting grammar mistakes is okay, and even expected. – robertsky (talk) 07:59, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

Pending changes settings

Hello @Robertsky, do you know if the below listed messages could be removed / hidden in this article (they did not appear previously).

Desktop view (when hovered over)

Page version status
This is an accepted version of this page
This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 2 November 2025.

Mobile view (permanent)

This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 2 November 2025.

It now looks as if the page has become even more protected, although it is my understanding is the opposite has occurred. Perhaps the solution used in this article could be adopted: it produces a discrete padlock in the top right corner, instead of the check mark symbol, above mentioned messages and additional lock currently found here.

Thank you kindly for looking into this. Sincerely, Pinacotecus (talk) 17:52, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

@Pinacotecus This was changed awhile back in 2024, I believe with phab:T191156. The message when there are pending changes does give pause to anon mobile editing though as it states that there are changes to be approved. I think this is best discussed at WP:VPT. – robertsky (talk) 22:55, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

@Robertsky, thank you for your response. I believe the simplest solution to remove the undesired Page version status messages above the Arc de Triomphe article would be one of the options listed below:

  1. Changing the protection settings to semi-protected, like in this article: Eiffel Tower (this article only has one discrete padlock icon in the top right corner)
  2. Removing the protections settings, like in this article: Palace of Versailles (this article has no protection messages and icons; semi-protected settings could be added again if needed)

Please advise which one you would recommend. Sincerely, Pinacotecus (talk) 16:22, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

@Pinacotecus the current protection was put in place after a request to lower it from a indef semi protection put in place since 2011 at RFPP/D. I have yet to see edits from anon editors since the current protection measures. I am unwilling to go back to semi protection as such. However, the other option of full unprotection is more tenable for now. As such I will have this done. However, if there are vandalism happening thereafter and depending on the severity, pending changes protection will be back up as it still does give anon editors the opportunity to constructively contribute to the article. – robertsky (talk) 00:17, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

@Robertsky, thank you. This looks much better now. Sincerely, Pinacotecus (talk) 17:48, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 November 2025

Tech News: 2025-46

MediaWiki message delivery 20:36, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Question from Annodomino23 on 2007–08 Segona Divisió (19:05, 14 November 2025)

How do I add a citation to the Final standings table? I am not sure how to interact with the template. I have found the following source: "https://globalsportsarchive.com/en/soccer/competition/segona-divisio-2007-2008/26439". --Annodomino23 (talk) 19:05, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

@Annodomino23 which article? – robertsky (talk) 19:13, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
This one: 2007–08 Segona Divisió Annodomino23 (talk) 19:14, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
@Annodomino23 Ah... what I suggest is to create the citation in your sandbox, switch to source editor after the citation is generated, and copy the formated string out. THen head back to the article, click on the [citation needed], a template interface will appear. Scroll down to there the input box reads "source=", change it to "source=<citation generated>. and then save the edits. – robertsky (talk) 19:27, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-47

MediaWiki message delivery 17:24, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 71

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 71, September–October 2025
  • Spotlight: 1Lib1Ref 2025 in Nigeria
  • Frankfurt Book Fair
  • Tech tip: Wikipedia Library access template
Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 15:22, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

(This message was sent to User:Robertsky and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Nomination for discussion of Template:IDRConvert

Template:IDRConvert has been nominated for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:24, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Question from Hringhorni101 (21:04, 19 November 2025)

hello i made this page can you see if everything looks right? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_Vulture --Hringhorni101 (talk) 21:05, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

@Hringhorni101 I am not into metal, but in general, there is a lack of independent third party sources. The only source of note is the album review. The rest cannot be use to sustain the notability of the subject. A quick search online does not reveal much about the band as well. You may see WP:NMUSIC for guidance. The article is not ready for the mainspace. I will have the article move to draftspace where you can take the time to develop the article further (as long as you make at least 1 edit every six months). As time progresses, hopefully there are more coverage of the band to establish their notability. – robertsky (talk) 21:21, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Articles for Creation backlog drive

Hello Robertsky:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive in December!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than half a month of outstanding reviews from the current 2+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 December 2025 through 31 December 2025.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 3000 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:07, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

Question from Sergeantpoop (15:00, 22 November 2025)

How do I give myself a userbox? --Sergeantpoop (talk) 15:00, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

Nevermind. Sergeantpoop (talk) 08:05, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-48

MediaWiki message delivery 15:54, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

Question from Nerd-boi1234 (20:16, 28 November 2025)

Also, where is the button to make a new article? --Nerd-boi1234 (talk) 20:16, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

Question from Nerd-boi1234 (19:47, 28 November 2025)

How do I find and make citations? --Nerd-boi1234 (talk) 19:47, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

@Nerd-boi1234 I have added some links on your talk page to some tutorials! Check the referencing tuturial out. – robertsky (talk) 03:07, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

Greetings

Hi Robertsky, I got a notification that you are my new mentor and wanted to reach out to say hi. One of my big goals this year was to contribute my first article to Wikipedia, since I got a little bit of experience with editing, so I'd love to stay in touch as I'm currently in the middle of the researching/drafting process. That's all for now. I'll let you know if any questions come up. Thank you! SimonMubarak (talk) 21:54, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

@SimonMubarak thanks for reaching out! hope you have a bountiful time here. – robertsky (talk) 03:07, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

CS1 error on Wang Fuk Court fire

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Wang Fuk Court fire, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:32, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 December 2025

  • Comix: Madness
    It could happen to anyone.