User talk:Renamed user e767775946ed678b83c31af17cc742df
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Haoresshin! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Lynch44 15:15, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
Welcome Haoresshin!
I'm FULBERT, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| To help get you started, you may find these useful: | When editing, follow the 3 Core Content Policies:
Always cite Independent and Reliable sources for all claims you make when editing. |
Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the 
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.
Notable herbicides
[edit]Thank you for adding to Lenacil. I am trying to fill in missing items from the list of herbicides mainly using information from the Compendium of Common Pesticide Names. If you have insight on what I should prioritize it would be a great help. -- Reconrabbit 15:40, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
- A reasonable prioritization would be any of the newer ones in the BCPC's Pesticide Manual (I used to have access to it, but not anymore); otherwise, working reverse chronologically off the Compendium list is not a terribly wrongheaded strategy. At this point, it is also terribly useful to ensure the HRAC class is explicitly mentioned in the articles for specific entities.
- (My own priority is insecticides/acaricides/nematicides, but I had lenacil as a stray in my personal list.) Haoresshin (talk) 15:58, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Sulfaclozine has been accepted
[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
-- Reconrabbit 18:31, 21 August 2025 (UTC)August 2025
[edit]
Hello, I'm DMacks. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please don't change IUPAC names without citing an existing source, such as pubchem or scifinder, for the specific chemical. Although the rules are well known and published (blue book, etc.), wiki rules are to give priority to other WP:RS for the full result rather than WP:SYNTH ourselves. DMacks (talk) 02:51, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
- I do not feel that they are any different from SMILES or InChI identifiers to deserve such privilege, but sure... Also, you mention PubChem: those people use [[1]] to generate their IUPAC names, as prominently noted in specific compound pages, so it is funny to me that you hold them up to being "reliable".Haoresshin (talk) 02:59, 27 August 2025 (UTC)