User talk:PokemonPerson/archive

June 2025

Hello, Sangjiinhwa, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as ChocolateMooFan2144 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 03:44, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

I am an alternate account, but not of ChocolateMooFan2144. I would not like to disclose what my old account is because I no longer use it. Sangjiinhwa (talk) 03:46, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

What is your relationship with Special:Contributions/Kaynsu1 and Special:Contributions/Cat-paw-v1? dbeef [talk] 12:30, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

those are my old accounts :( I no longer use them and would like to distance myself from them. Sangjiinhwa (talk) 13:25, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Your old accounts have received a lot of warnings. Please carefully take them into account. I'd like to remind you that on Wikipedia it generally isn't okay to create a new account and not disclosing that, unless for very specific circumstances (WP:CLEANSTART).

Also, do not make logged-out edits (some of which I can interpret as trolling). This is a final warning, if you repeat some of the disruptions the older accounts have made again, you will be blocked from editing. dbeef [talk] 13:57, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Just for clarity, I created User:Kaynsu1 when I forgot the password to User:Cat-paw-v1. I had to create this account because Wikipedia was requiring me to verify with email when I never attached an email address to either of those accounts. Sangjiinhwa (talk) 00:57, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

I have now redirected User:Cat-paw-v1 and User:Kaynsu1 to my userpage. Sangjiinhwa (talk) 00:37, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Hawk Tuah crap

Please stop. If you continue to attempt to make disruptive edits to Wikipedia and trigger the edit filter, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:45, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

What I was trying to do was make a redirect. I understand why it was not done after receiving a reply on Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Reports but it was not intended to be disruptive. Sangjiinhwa (talk) 02:47, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

PRODs

Hello, Sangjiinhwa,

If you remove a PROD tag, please leave an edit summary with a brief explanation of why you removed the tag and how you might address problems with the article. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:48, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

I see I already left messages about this behavior on your previous account (here). Please do not go on another mass-de-PRODding spree or I will isssue you a block. Like all of your mass editing projects, you were handling this carelessly. I don't want to see that again with your new account. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:52, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

I understand that I am on a tight leash, and will make sure to leave a summary in the future so I won't get bloked. Sangjiinhwa (talk) 03:26, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Why did you remove the PROD on Sophalexios? You say that it doesn’t look like a hoax to you but you give absolutely no reason. The AFD has been unanimous that it’s a hoax.—-Ermenrich (talk) 11:55, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

I too would like to see a reply to Ermenrich's question. Why did you remove the PROD on Sophalexios, which is obviously a hoax? Your answer on WP:CGR is not sufficient. The assertion of supposed "nuance" is not an argument. Ifly6 (talk) 18:48, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

The aforementioned AfD says that it's impressively well-made which is why it fooled me. When I looked over a page I saw a large amount of fairly legitimate sources, which made it seem to me that Sophalexios was not a hoax. The Mythology section was well-made and also seemed legitimate. I realize that I should probably looked to see if any of the sources mentioned Sophalexions before removing the tag; I added the hoax tag in case it did turn out to be a hoax, so someone could take a closer look at it. Sangjiinhwa (talk) 17:20, 6 September 2025 (UTC)

It’s obvious that had you done a minimum amount of due diligence you wouldn’t have removed the PROD. You’ve been warned about this before, haven’t you?—-Ermenrich (talk) 18:25, 6 September 2025 (UTC)

The PROD I put on linked the discussion on WP:CGR. The small library of sources was spurious as I made clear here in that discussion. If you had at all reviewed the discussion at WP:CGR this would not have happened; your failure to do so betrays a pattern of negligent carelessness in your de-PROD objections. Ifly6 (talk) 20:37, 6 September 2025 (UTC)

I reviewed the discussion briefly and even commented there. The comment you mentioned was only about the URL; as I mentioned before the books looked fairly legitimate. The discussion only said it 'looked like a hoax' which to me it did not. Sangjiinhwa (talk) 00:54, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

So the fact that literally everyone else who discussed it said it was a hoax didn't bother you?—-Ermenrich (talk) 12:39, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

July 2025

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Davis Street (Hong Kong) did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit and/or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

or in the visual editor:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Describe what you changed

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:45, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

I did not know of this setting. I will enabele it, thanks for telling me about it Sangjiinhwa (talk) 03:27, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Sangjiinhwa. Thank you for your work on I'm with T-Mobile. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:07, 7 August 2025 (UTC)

Pedophile (insult)

Hello. I have noted some of the concerns above. Could you indicate the purpose for creating this article? It appears to be bordering on vandalism, particularly with the sentence that I have removed. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, it is an encyclopedia. Local Variable (talk) 14:26, 11 August 2025 (UTC)

It is not Vandalism, additionally other pages such as Fascist (insult) exists, and the word has became used as a buzzword recently. Sangjiinhwa (talk) 03:34, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

There's not enough to justify a standalone article, and another editor has appropriately redirected it. Please be cautious about including references to the term being used against LGBTQ people, because it risks giving undue weight to go a fringe view. Local Variable (talk) 06:47, 13 August 2025 (UTC)

AI-first moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to AI-first. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Tenshi! (Talk page) 20:42, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Change Charagua for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Change Charagua is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Change Charagua until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Krisgabwoosh (talk) 21:37, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

"Mikucraft" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Mikucraft has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 10 § Mikucraft until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 09:44, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Your username

It is too similar to that of Sangjinhwa (talk · contribs) who has 25,000+ edits here. Please change it as it is too similar to that of another established user, or alternatively please put something on your user page stating that you are a different person than this editor to minimize confusion. Regards, ~delta ^{(talk • cont)} 20:05, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

I've just lodged a username change request. Thanks for notifying me. Sangjiinhwa (talk) 21:24, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

Y Rename Done - FlightTime (open channel) 21:44, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

Thanks PokémonPerson 02:59, 22 October 2025 (UTC)