User talk:LoganDocMan2000

October 2025

Hello, I'm Binksternet. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of mainstream rock performers, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 04:41, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to List of rock genres. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 03:41, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Lists of multimedia franchises

Please take care not to add entries to this master list unless they are included in one of the sublists, for which they are required to have media across multiple franchises. For example a television show with multiple television spinoffs is only in a single media and is not multimedia. BD2412 T 04:34, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@BD2412 I'm sorry LoganDocManBoy2000 (talk) 04:40, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to List of rock genres. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 13:39, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Binksternet Sorry LoganDocManBoy2000 (talk) 14:00, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to List of hip-hop genres. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Solidest (talk) 04:58, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Solidest Oh brother LoganDocManBoy2000 (talk) 04:59, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mfield (Oi!) 06:12, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Admin note - repeatedly pulling up to the 3RR line on the same article and then returning later is no better than blowing right through that limit. If you continue to edit war on this article you will be blocked from editing it entirely. Mfield (Oi!) 06:13, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to List of rock genres. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 05:09, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Template categorization and colon trick

Please take a look at the template categorization guidelines for how to correctly add categorization to templates.

And also at Help:Colon trick for how to link to categories. In a nutshell: [[Category:X1]] is not the same as [[:Category:X1]]. —⁠andrybak (talk) 17:38, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Atmospheric doom moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Atmospheric doom. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 05:56, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Symphonic doom moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Symphonic doom. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. aesurias (talk) 06:41, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Doom folk moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Doom folk. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. aesurias (talk) 06:41, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Atmospheric doom (December 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hurricane Wind and Fire was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Without any references, there can be no article. See Help:Referencing for beginners to learn how to cite sources. However, after a further search, I am skeptical this term is notable at all.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Atmospheric doom and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 04:09, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LoganDocMan2000! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 04:09, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Symphonic doom (December 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MCE89 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Symphonic doom and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MCE89 (talk) 05:39, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Folk doom moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Folk doom. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and require WP:RS, WP:IS and needs to be rewritten. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. QEnigma 论 06:19, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Symphonic doom (December 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Symphonic doom and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 05:06, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Folk doom (December 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Folk doom and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 05:06, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Folk doom (December 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EatingCarBatteries was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Folk doom and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EatingCarBatteries _{(contributions, talk)} 06:28, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Symphonic doom (December 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tenshi Hinanawi was:

This draft has been resubmitted without any visible improvement, or with very little improvement. If you do not know what is needed to improve this draft, please ask for advice rather than making minor improvements and resubmitting.

You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Articles for Creation help desk or on the talk pages of any of the declining reviewers. (The declining reviewers may also advise you to visit the help desk.)

If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement again, it is likely to be rejected, and it may be nominated for deletion, or a topic-ban may even be requested against further submission by the responsible editor.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Symphonic doom and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tenshi! (Talk page) 12:08, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Folk doom moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Folk doom (2nd time). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources and republished unsourced article . I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GPL93 (talk) 17:59, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Will you please make Folk Doom abd Symphonic Doom real pages on Wikipedia please I am begging you please make those 2 Heavy Metal genres real genres on Wikipedia already please ~2025-41752-95 (talk) 18:03, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Symphonic doom moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Symphonic doom (2nd draftify). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources and once again no sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GPL93 (talk) 18:02, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Atmospheric doom moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Atmospheric doom. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GPL93 (talk) 18:03, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

December 2025

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to List of rock genres. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 18:14, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What ever happened to editing any page you want I mean this is ridiculous calling me out time and time again because of my ferocious habit of editing Wikipedia pages left and right why can't you just let me do my job and leave me alone in peace and quiet please ~2025-41752-95 (talk) 18:17, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is a collaborative place, not a private publishing platform for you alone. There are rules here, and folks must abide by the rules or face the consequences.

You keep creating pages with no supporting citations, and you keep adding less relevant stuff to the List of rock genres. This behavior is definitely going to get you noticed. Binksternet (talk) 18:33, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And yet there are some non-rock genres that do have influences/elements of rock or rock adjacent things like Acid Jazz is sort of an offshoot of Acid Rock with jazz elements thrown in there so you gotta agree with me on that one ~2025-41688-62 (talk) 20:24, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Soul music. Binksternet (talk) 05:15, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2026

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Zinnober9 (talk) 06:10, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lists of rock music groups

As much as your recent mass addition of Category:Lists of rock music groups is appreciated, all those lists are already under sub-categories of that same category, and thus your edits are superfluous.--3family6 (Talk to me|See what I have done) 13:35, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. @LoganDocMan2000, please stop this. I suggest reading Wikipedia:Categorization, especially WP:SUBCAT, before doing any more categorization tasks on Wikipedia. Woodroar (talk) 23:01, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I am so sorry folks LoganDocMan2000 (talk) 23:03, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, no worries. Mistakes happen, just try not to make them again.--3family6 (Talk to me|See what I have done) 21:53, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

I see that you are a newer member of the project. Welcome! If you would like advice or guidance, I'm happy to lend my experience. Happy editing!--3family6 (Talk to me|See what I have done) 21:55, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]