Jump to content

User talk:Hurricane Wind and Fire

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Hurricane Wind and Fire!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.


The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.


The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips
  • Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
  • It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
  • If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
  • Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
  • When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
  • If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
  • Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Adflatusstalk 05:25, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hello Hurricane Wind and Fire! The thread you created at the Teahouse, How to Add the Description for an Article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:20, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 February 2025

[edit]
French Wikipedia defends a user against public threats, steward elections, and other news from the Wikimedia world.
"The only time I ever took photos in my entire life".
From patrolling new edits to uploading photos or joining a campaign, you can count on the Wikimedia platform to be up and running — in your language, anywhere in the world. That is, except for a couple of minutes during the equinoctes.
Or just the end of Wikipedia as we know it?
Of "hunters", "busybodies" and "dancers".
User Sennecaster shares her thoughts on her recent RfA and the aspects that might have played a role in making it successful.
What are they? Why are they important? How can we make them better? And what can you do to help?
Liberté, liberté chérie.
Grammys, politics and the Super Bowl.
Straight from the source's mouth. A source is a source, of course, of course!
Turkish linguist wrote about languages and plants; Brazilian informaticist studied Wikimedia projects and education.

The Signpost: 22 March 2025

[edit]
It's an ecstasy, my spring.
Let them know what you think!
Read this, then forget all about it.
Life on the Wiki as usual!
And WMF invites multi-year research fund proposals
The Oscars, politics, and death elbow for the most attention.
The photographers are the celebrities!
And very unusual biographical images.
Send not to know
For whom the bell tolls,
It tolls for thee.

The Signpost: 9 April 2025

[edit]
Fellow doctor Osama Khalid remains behind bars for "violating public morals" by editing.
Major changes to core content policy, or still-developing plan for new initiative?
Defeat, or just a setback?
Plus: 30-year anniversary of wiki software commemorated.
Our content is free, our infrastructure is not!
What is to be done?
Advice to aspirants: "Read RfA debriefs", including this one.
Rest in peace.
Snow White sinking, Adolescence soaring, spacefarers stranded, this list has it all!
The Wikimedia Foundation's announcement from Diff.
Gadzooks!

Welcome!

[edit]

Hey there Hurricane Wind and Fire, I saw you joined the WPTC, welcome! I wondered what aspect of tropical cyclones you're most interested in. Maybe it's newer storms, maybe it's climatology, maybe it's one of those lists of tropical cyclones in a certain area. I just wrote List of Queensland tropical cyclones, as an example of that last category. Just wanted to reach out, and see if you needed any help, or suggestions. We can use all of the editors we can get, there are thousands of articles that need work! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:05, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message, Hurricanehink. I'm the most interested in the effects of newer storms. I'll be more involved with WPTC when the 2025 Atlantic and Pacific hurricane seasons begin. They're the basins I'm the most interested in. Before I created my account, I was studying the WPTC pages and I think I'm familiar with the guidelines. Again, thank you for the message. Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) 19:41, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
So you're only interested in writing about active storms? What about the off-season, it might be a bit before we get any storms :P ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:44, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the late response. What I meant is writing about storms in recent years, typically from 2010 to now. Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) 01:25, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nice, there are a lot important storms in that time period. Do you have any interest in helping with any of the lists? A lot of them need updating specifically for storms from the last 15 years. For example, List of Florida hurricanes (2000-present) has fallen behind when it comes to references, which is why it's no longer a featured list. Similar problems are in List_of_North_Carolina_hurricanes_(2000–present) with the newer storms. Or maybe are you more interested in working on an existing article and wanna help improve it? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:53, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As of now, I think I'll mainly work on improving existing articles, especially expanding stub and start class articles. Updating lists does sound interesting, though. Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) 02:54, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If you really wanted to improve a stub or start class article, there are a few options, like Ernesto from last year (which needs expansion for Caribbean and Bermuda impacts), similar story for Hurricane Earl (2022), Hurricane Grace needs more Mexican impacts, and Tropical Storm Gordon (2018) mostly needs to be better organized and fleshed out. Those are the only start articles in the Atlantic, but there are more articles outside of the Atlantic that need work. As for the lists, I just finished List of Australia tropical cyclones. It's a good way of listing every single storm for a given state. So it comes down to if you want to focus on a specific storm and work on a single article, or if you like the idea of a series of storms. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:56, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think working on and expanding a single article interests me the most. I've done that with some ghost town and wildfire articles and I enjoyed that work. Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) 13:39, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Love that! I've worked on many storm articles over the years. Do any storms stand out that you want to work on? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:20, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As of now, I might want to begin working on Ernesto and Earl. And I didn't realize until now that there aren't a lot of start class Atlantic basin articles. I might want to work on improving storms that had their names retired and are still a C-class, such as Michael. Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) 00:01, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I love that you might be willing to work on something significant like Michael, but if you don't mind me suggesting, start with something easier, and work your way up. Earl, for example, only affected the northeast Caribbean, Bermuda, and Canada. Those areas are a bit easier to find information on than, say, Central America, Mexico, or Cuba, where you might have a language barrier. Same story with Ernesto. Either way, do you think you know what you need to do for either article? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:06, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the advice. I think Earl would be a good way for me to start off. I think I need to update the article with the Tropical Cyclone Reports? Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) 00:24, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Bingo, use the tropical cyclone reports, use the advisories, use the tropical weather outlooks before the storm formed, and anything else to flesh out the met history. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:43, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the very late response. I must've checked my talk page without going down to this section so I didn't see the notification. Thank you for the help. I'll start working on Earl once I find some time (I have a busy week). Again, thank you so much for the advice. Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) 23:48, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's never a problem. There's no deadline for Wikipedia :) ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:49, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 May 2025

[edit]
As always, Wikimedia community governance relies on user participation; plus, more updates from the Wikimedia world
Scrapers, an Indian lawsuit, and a crash-or-not-crash?
And other new research findings.
And don't bite those newbies!
And don't bite those newbies!
Television dramas, televised sports, film, the Pope, and ... bioengineering at the top of the list?
Community volunteers network among themselves and use technology to counter attacks on information sharing.
A look at some product and tech highlights from the Wikimedia Foundation's Annual Plan (July–December 2024).
Hey! At least it is something!
Zounds!
Would a billion articles be a good idea?
There's a lot more to this than you think.
I wonder about having crats, but decided to become one anyway.
Just beautiful photos!
Rest in Paradise.

The Signpost: 14 May 2025

[edit]
And comment is requested on a privacy whitepaper.
And other courtroom drama.
And how he knows it: all about lawyer letters and editing logs.
Why the language barrier is not the only impediment to navigating sources from another culture.
And QR codes for every page!
When an editor is ready to become staff at a public library (not a brother in a fraternity).
Rest in peace.
The technology behind it, and the other stuff.
Gadzooks!
And more.

Accepted drafts

[edit]

Hi, hope you're well. Three drafts you started, Caughlin Fire, Washoe Drive Fire and Davis Fire were all accepted today (by me). AFCH only puts the acceptance templates on the submitter's talk page rather than the author so I thought I'd let you know myself. While I know virtually nothing about wildfires, the drafts were well-written and well-sourced. Cheers. Rambley (talk) 21:58, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing my drafts. It looks like someone else submitted them, I don't know how much they contributed. Sorry for the rather late response, I'm travelling. Have a good day. Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) 03:56, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 June 2025

[edit]
Admins arrested in Belarus.
Pardon our alliteration!
A get-out-of-jail card!
And other new research publications.
Holy men and not-as-holy movies.
Get your self-nomination in by July 2nd!
After two years RuWiki fails to thrive.
With some sweet-and-sour sauce!
Every thing you need to know about the Wikimedia Foundation?
Egad!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rowena Fire has been accepted

[edit]
Rowena Fire, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 14:04, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Forsyth Fire has been accepted

[edit]
Forsyth Fire, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 22% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Utopes (talk / cont) 21:55, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 July 2025

[edit]
Endowment tax form, Wikimania, elections, U4C, fundraising and a duck!
And how do we know?
Five-year journey comes to healthy fruition.
Wikimedians from around the world will gather in person and online at the twentieth annual meeting of Wikimania.
As well as "hermeneutic excursions" and other scientific research findings.
The report covers the Foundation's operations from July 2023 - June 2024
A step towards objective and comprehensive coverage of a project nearly too big to follow.
Drawn this century!
How data from the Wikipedia "necessary articles" lists can shed new light on the gender gap
Annual plans, external trends, infrastructure, equity, safety, and effectiveness. What does it all mean?
Rest in peace.
Wouldn't it be nice without billionaires, scandals, deaths, and wars?
If you are too blasé for Mr. Blasé and don't give a FAC.