User talk:Letknowledgebeyourlight

September 2020

Hello. Your recent edit to Sharon High School appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Candidates for office are rarely considered notable. If he is elected then he would be presumed notable. Gab4gab (talk) 12:37, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Hello, I'm Gab4gab. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sharon High School, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Gab4gab (talk) 14:31, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ted Philips (November 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs more sources (local newspapers, TV will work), plus Two sentences does not an article make, add some meat to these bones! Then it should be good to accept.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ted Philips and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ted Philips, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 17:09, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Letknowledgebeyourlight! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bkissin (talk) 17:09, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ted Philips has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ted Philips. Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 02:16, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ted Philips has been accepted

Ted Philips, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Paul W (talk) 16:26, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Harry Kane, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:19, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harvey Mansfield, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edward Mansfield. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Tyler Booker. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please don't pipe pages like 2025 NFL draft to overcapitalize to "Draft". See MOS:CAPS. Thanks. —Bagumba (talk) 01:43, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan Trahan

Hi. Why did you remove sourced content without giving an edit summary? Thank you. Theofunny (talk) 10:37, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Alex Kantrowitz

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Alex Kantrowitz, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:52, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alex Kantrowitz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alex Kantrowitz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Kantrowitz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ednabrenze (talk) 07:58, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Jake Auchincloss

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jake Auchincloss, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:15, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 2025

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Dimiter Angelov (academic), please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. categorization rules differ by wiki. ^SMason_Garrison 01:19, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The War Horse (newsroom) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to The War Horse (newsroom). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:00, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve USA Luge

Hello, Letknowledgebeyourlight,

Thank you for creating USA Luge.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Do you have any secondary sources for this page? Thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|49ersBelongInSanFrancisco}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:13, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve USA Archery

Hello, Letknowledgebeyourlight,

Thank you for creating USA Archery.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

It requires reliable secondary and independent references to the subject.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Fade258}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Fade258 (talk) 01:57, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

USA Luge moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to USA Luge. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 22:56, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jake Auchincloss

Hello, I'm Theofunny. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Twitter is also not a Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. Thank you.

Theofunny (talk) 14:28, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Debora Cahn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Diplomat.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Majority Democrats

The article Majority Democrats has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article fails to demonstrate that the organization meets the notability guideline for organizations and companies (WP:ORG). While there is some primary or routine media coverage, there is no significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources that provide in-depth discussion of the organization’s impact or accomplishments. Most of the article is based on the organization’s own materials and promotional claims, rather than independent analysis or third-party reporting. As such, the subject does not appear to have received the sustained attention necessary to establish encyclopedic notability and should be deleted.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Letknowledgebeyourlight. Thank you for your work on Howard Triest. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more footnotes to back up each claim with a reliable source. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 08:49, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Letknowledgebeyourlight. Thank you for your work on Ron Vachris. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 08:35, 11 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of American Institute for Boys and Men

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on American Institute for Boys and Men requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TornadoLGS (talk) 23:15, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The War Horse (newsroom)

Hello, Letknowledgebeyourlight. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The War Horse (newsroom), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:09, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dhruv Khullar

The article Dhruv Khullar has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.

SatnaamIN (talk) 21:49, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]