User talk:EditorShane3456

Welcome to my talk page! Talk to me about any issues you have with my editing, or ask about my work here!

October 2023

Hello, I'm Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Minecraft (franchise) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 18:45, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Minecraft (franchise), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 18:52, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

the source is mostly youtube and research from the internet. Shaneapickle (talk) 18:53, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All material must be attributable to reliable, published sources per WP:V Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 19:03, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: C/2024 G3 (ATLAS) (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

no sources?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:C/2024 G3 (ATLAS) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:00, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shaneapickle! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 17:00, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: C/2024 G3 (ATLAS) (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:C/2024 G3 (ATLAS) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:21, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello, I'm R0paire-wiki. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Gorilla Tag have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. R0paire 17:09, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In the game, it is actually called Monke, not Monkey, thats why i edited it. Shaneapickle (talk) 15:06, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Outer Worlds, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 13:47, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for IM-2

On 11 March 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article IM-2, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 05:38, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I was one of the first ones to figure out that NASA and IM lost contact, yet some people didnt believe me. Shaneapickle (talk) 12:14, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Shaneapickle! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Hello, I am working on a page about a recent plane crash that happened yesterday (March 9th), has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:41, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Selam (moon) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Selam (moon). Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:33, 19 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Selam (moon) has been accepted

Selam (moon), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

LR.127 (talk) 04:31, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Shaneapickle! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Hey, I made a new page about a asteroid moon, Selam and I need some help, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:26, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Johann Nepomuk Hauser has been accepted

Johann Nepomuk Hauser, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 22:19, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Aprod

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Aprod, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:44, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Jean-Rémi Yama

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, the introduction of inappropriate pages, such as Talk:Jean-Rémi Yama, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bored kittycat (talk) 14:49, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok Shaneapickle (talk) 15:03, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war claim

You are going around making accusations about an edit war, but which specific article(s) is this supposed edit war happening on? Fram (talk) 15:40, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, let me explain here, MHD and Kajmer are warring over kurdish nationalist pages, (the battle ones to be specific) in which MHD is claiming that kajmer is targetting kurdish nationalist pages, but kajmer is saying he didnt. Shaneapickle (talk) 15:43, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Specific articles. If you can't name them, then no report at any admin noticeboard will even be looked at. Disagreeing about a topic or occasionally editing the same page is not an edit war. Fram (talk) 15:52, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:25, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:C/2024 G3 (ATLAS)

Hello, Shaneapickle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:C/2024 G3 (ATLAS), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:08, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I already self-requested for deletion. Shaneapickle (talk) 15:20, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2025 BU

Hello, Shaneapickle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2025 BU, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:07, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please step back from admin areas

Hi Shane. It's always great to see an enthusiastic newer user around. However, and I have to be blunt here, when it comes to your recent edits at AN/I, you frankly seem to not know what you are doing. WP:AN/I § Expecting ITN/C to make a exception: User:Morgajon was BITEy as noted there; you then went to the user's talk page and continued to call them suspicious. At WP:AN/I § Preaching WP:THETRUTH you tried to explain how TPA revocation works to admins. And, much more concerningly, at WP:AN/I § Kelisi and IPA you've thrown fuel onto a fire others were trying to put out first by baselessly alleging account compromise, then incorrectly stating everything on wikipedia should have sources, and finally making the completely incorrect statement that pronunciations on the English Wikipedia must be in English—which I guess, in a silver lining, was enough to unify the two opposing parties to tell you you were wrong.

AN/I isn't a playground. Admin areas aren't a playground, as I see another admin has already explained to you here. I see you've also made User:Shaneapickle/Empire of Wallenderte, which I've just deleted under CSD G3 as a hoax, and that, after being told you were wrong in that third AN/I thread, you went to one of the parties' usertalks to start a debate over monarchism. There's also this bit of vandalism a couple months ago. So maybe more broadly I should just say, Wikipedia isn't a playground.

Do you want to contribute to building an encyclopedia? Great! There's lots of things to do and always some new article to work on. I would absolutely encourage you to apply your enthusiasm to the awesome task of building the world's most comprehensive reference work. On the other hand, if you want to watch drama, play cops-and-robbers with bad guys, and argue with people over politics, there are plenty of sites for that, but this is not one. So I would encourage you to pick one of those two options—focusing on content work or not editing. If you continue to make these kinds of disruptive edits in admin areas, you will probably get blocked soon enough, either by me or someone else, either from AN/I or the WP: namespace or the whole site. And I hate to see enthusiasm wasted, so let's not go down that route. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 19:55, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Tamzin, I just got this message, and I personally think my suspicions against Morgajon were valid because I have seen many people edit pages with their own promotion of their buisness, and the ITN candidates debacle was kind of like those situations, and also I am not a new user, I have been editing for 2 years already. Morgajon tried to defy the notability guidelines we have for ITN by nominating the Oasis tour, (we never post tours, I checked like every single tour, and not ONE of them were posted to ITN) and everyone in that nomination had a consensus to not post. I told him upfront that I have seen many people do these kind of things, trying to promote their buisness or something they had a conflict of interest on, and I explained to him that his edits to the page (which are only the Oasis tour, mind you) seemed like he was being paid to do these edits and promote it on our wiki. And for the Empire of Wallenderte, my school blocked Fandom, Wikimedia, and MicroWiki so I cant make my own page/wiki for my micronation. I wouldn't call that a debate, i was just telling him my opinion on socialism and monarchism, which it wasn't a complete debate because he did not even respond to my opinion. Shaneapickle (talk) 20:06, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And look, I dont have anything against new user's in general, but if they seem to be promotional in nature (like morgajon) I would call them out for it. Shaneapickle (talk) 20:08, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What I'm hearing here is that you don't understand WP:NOTFORUM or WP:UPNOT, don't intend to comply with WP:BITE, and are continuing to make baseless allegations of COI that multiple admins have told you are non-actionable, pinging the user in the process, which makes this verge on harassment.

I'm sure you feel like you're offering a good rebuttal to what I said, but what you're actually doing is making a case that a block would be necessary to prevent disruption. You seem like a very bright young person, but it's important to understand that you don't know everything. I'm far from infallible, but for a moment let's just assume that I, as an administrator who's been editing for half her life, probably know more than you about what is and isn't acceptable conduct on Wikipedia. Can you reread what I wrote with that assumption in mind, and then consider whether there was a better way to respond? -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 20:24, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Shane, just to let you know -- I've declined your request for rollback. Rollback generally requires more experience both editing mainspace and reverting vandalism. The issues with WP:BITE were also a concern. Feel free to ping me if you have any questions.

@Tamzin has given you some great advice above on how to get more involved in editing. I would encourage you to take it; working in mainspace is a great way to build up an understanding of how Wikipedia works and is frankly some of the most fulfilling work you can do here. Thanks, Giraffer (talk) 23:26, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Giraffer I actually have one concern here, as I now realize looking back I was a bit harsh on Morgajon, but still, I was being vigilant and calling out someone who I thought was paid to edit the Oasis tour page, and nominate it for ITN, but we still have notability guidelines for ITN, anything can be on ITN if it is notable enough. That's why I called him out for expecting us to make an exception for the tour, but I realize now that was harsh as hell. 2606:9400:98A0:92A0:89A7:7CA3:1401:7BC5 (talk) 19:50, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why you pinged me...? Also, please edit while logged in if you can. Thanks, Giraffer (talk) 19:56, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I logged in when I was in connecticut (6 days ago) , and my school blocked auth.wikimedia so i cant log back in, and you said here

" Feel free to ping me if you have any questions." 2606:9400:98A0:92A0:89A7:7CA3:1401:7BC5 (talk) 19:57, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Republic of Berlandia

Hello, EditorShane3456. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Republic of Berlandia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:04, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]