User talk:CyberXploit

March 2025

Hello, I'm ManaliJain. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Dev Joshi have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ManaliJain (talk) 13:58, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Linking

Please don't link common terms; there is additional information at WP:OVERLINK.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:50, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vastav Artificial Intelligence for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vastav Artificial Intelligence is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vastav Artificial Intelligence until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 03:25, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CyberXploit, please do not recreate nominated articles under a different title, as you did at Vastav. I have converted it into a redirect to the above article. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 05:09, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hacktivist Vanguard for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hacktivist Vanguard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hacktivist Vanguard (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Agent 007 (talk) 14:34, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Btw Santhosh per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Btw Santhosh. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Spicy (talk) 15:21, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]