User talk:BrookTheHumming

Nomination of Emmy Clarke for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emmy Clarke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmy Clarke until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mpen320 (talk) 03:23, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for merger of Template:Jiminy Cricket in animation

Template:Jiminy Cricket in animation has been nominated for merging with Template:Disney's Pinocchio. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 10:37, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Unsourced production companies

Please don't add production companies without citing a reliable source, as you did in this edit. Like other content on Wikipedia, this needs to be properly sourced. In many cases, editors guess at these companies based on the logos they see on promotional material. Some of these companies could very well be production companies, but others are likely to be investors, rights holders, etc. Sometimes editors also want to "give credit where it's due" on their own initiative. This includes animation companies or other services that no reliable sources identify as production companies. This is why we let sources decide who the production companies are. If everyone just added whoever they thought should belong in the infobox, it would become bloated with a bunch of entries that are not actually production companies. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:24, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

If it is for my edition in A Very Merry Pooh Year, I have added the company again, this time with a reference that was already in the article. I don't know if that reference will be acceptable. - BrookTheHumming (talk) 09:43, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

As far as I can tell, the phrase "Disney Animation France" does not appear on page 340 of that book. Can you quote the sentence where it appears? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:19, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

I strongly suggest that you respond to me. If you're adding hoax citations, this will need to be cleaned up. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:11, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

As I said, I only used a reference that was already in the article. If it is incorrect, then it should be removed from the page. BrookTheHumming (talk) 09:52, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Are you refusing to quote the line from the source that says this? Did you add a hoax citation? Do not ignore this question. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:17, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

I have already resolved it, and I have changed the studio to Walt Disney Television Animation. My fault, since, as I said, I did not place that reference in the article, but when I saw it next to the name of that studio I assumed that it was a reference that stated that it was involved in the production.- BrookTheHumming (talk) 01:06, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Disney Villains

The Disney company that owns the villains only consider 11 of them as primary members I don't know why but it's not 13 that was just a game in the merchandise. CourageousMarie (talk) 00:32, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

I guess the reason there's 11 because of Chernabog because he's from Fantasia and it wasn't a regular Disney film it was an anthology film. CourageousMarie (talk) 00:34, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

But it only has 11 on Disney wiki CourageousMarie (talk) 00:54, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Check in with the Disney Company and look up Disney Villains on Disney wiki on fandom. CourageousMarie (talk) 00:36, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Two Chips and a Miss

Hello, BrookTheHumming. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Two Chips and a Miss, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:06, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Dangerverse

Hello, BrookTheHumming. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dangerverse, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Disney Villains

Do you not know 13 Reflections of Evil was sub-franchise from 10 years ago they don't count all of them as primary members ask the Company and franchise. BelBott (talk) 19:35, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Truth

Fine I don't really care for Disney villains any I was trying to make things make sense. BelBott (talk) 19:49, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

What I really is to explain that Ghostface is not one of the most recognizable horror characters cause he's not a character he's an identity. BelBott (talk) 19:54, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Sockpuppet accounts

FYI the accounts you have recently been reverting at List of Disney villain characters are sockpuppets of a long term vandal. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jinnifer. You can just report these to WP:AIV when you notice them, with a brief explanation and a link to the SPI case. MrOllie (talk) 20:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

I know, I know. A few days ago the user was with the same topic of "Disney villains", also editing about slasher films... Too much of a coincidence if they were two different people. If in the future this user does these editing wars again with another account, I will follow your advice to report it. - BrookTheHumming (talk) 20:16, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Sariel Xilo (talk) 15:46, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

September 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Wonderful Wizard of Quads. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Amaury • 23:04, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

The same to you. You are the one who constantly deletes content that others add. BrookTheHumming (talk) 23:12, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on Mayonnaise

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Mayonnaise, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:54, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of pirate films and television series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Mitchell.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Edits to Snow White page

Hi, you seem to have reverted my recent edits to the Snow White page, with reference to "Mirror Mirror". Can I ask you why you have done this? You didn't add any reason to the summary comments. Many thanks. Deltasquared (talk) 17:09, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

If you're referring to the article about the Disney franchise, I've removed it for that reason, because the article is about the Disney franchise related to the 1937 film. And 2012's film Mirror Mirror has no relation to that franchise, being just one of many productions adapted from the original "Snow White" tale. BrookTheHumming (talk) 20:38, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

OK, understood. So it should be under snow white the story instead. Deltasquared (talk) 14:07, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

Disney Villains

Look up primary Disney Villains franchise details on Google MaggieDetra (talk) 13:33, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

TV Tropes.com is a source https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Franchise/DisneyVillains MaggieDetra (talk) 13:39, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

No, it's also a site where anyone can edit, and without using any official reference to what's written. BrookTheHumming (talk) 13:42, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Just look it up with the company MaggieDetra (talk) 13:43, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Nobody edits on tv tropes MaggieDetra (talk) 13:44, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Google also agrees MaggieDetra (talk) 13:45, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Like Dinsey Princess there are officially 13 primary members for Dinsey villains it's officially 11 primary members. MaggieDetra (talk) 13:55, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Ok, MaggieDetra (a.k.a. Jinnifer, a.k.a. CourageousMarie, a.k.a. BelBott...), could you provide an official source from The Walt Disney Company or a report about someone from the company talking about the franchise where it's officially mentioned the official characters? (You're still in time before you get blocked again for a Sockpuppet account.) BrookTheHumming (talk) 13:57, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

I am not Jinnifer also Disney Princess and Villains is correct on that wiki. MaggieDetra (talk) 13:59, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

You're the one getting everything wrong. MaggieDetra (talk) 14:00, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Gaston or Oogie is hardly seen with other villains they don't count as primary members. MaggieDetra (talk) 14:01, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Disney wiki is actually serious. MaggieDetra (talk) 14:03, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

You get that idea from 13 Reflections of Evil from 12 years ago which was a one time event doesn't count. MaggieDetra (talk) 14:11, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

But you do not deny the other two accounts, which as seen in the February 2024 - March 2024 sections of my Talk page, you came with the same topic, and in both cases were blocked. Just as Disney Princess has its official website, where the 13 members are clearly named, is there an official site that mentions the primary members of Disney Villains? So far, the closest thing to that is the reference to the "13 Reflections of Evil". And stop mentioning Disney Wiki as if it were an official Disney website. I'm trying to make you understand the situation if you want to avoid having your account blocked again. BrookTheHumming (talk) 14:07, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

If Disney villains had its own website it would tell you the same. MaggieDetra (talk) 14:13, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

13 of the villains were only for that event years ago. MaggieDetra (talk) 14:14, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Should Lady Tremaine or Judge Claude Frollo should also because they've been recurring 2600:387:C:7130:0:0:0:5 (talk) 18:50, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Michael Myers

Can you fix the Michael Myers article just from Ghostface from him doesn't belong there Michael Myers goes alongside Jason Voorhees and Freddy Krueger the big three of horror. 2600:387:F:5C34:0:0:0:7 (talk) 15:33, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Will be able to come to the Michael Myers article see what's wrong it's on top in its in popular culture section? 2600:387:F:5C34:0:0:0:7 (talk) 16:08, 8 April 2025 (UTC)