Jump to content

User talk:Another Believer/Archive 45

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 40Archive 43Archive 44Archive 45Archive 46Archive 47Archive 50

Oregon Community Credit Union

Why did you delete most of my edits? Uplinkspygirl (talk) 22:40, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

History, services, assets all existed on that page for over a decade. I simply added current information. Why would you delete that? Uplinkspygirl (talk) 22:41, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
On a separate note, I don't know how to change the logo. I'm somewhat new to this. There is a new logo on their website. Can you change? Uplinkspygirl (talk) 22:42, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
No, thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:05, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Are you able to tell me why you deleted the other information? Uplinkspyder (talk) 04:44, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
For the reasons mentioned in my revert's edit summary. Please do not add back any unsourced or promotional text, or unnecessary detail. ---Another Believer (Talk) 05:06, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

@Bri: You might be interested, given your question here. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 05:21, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:24, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
My pleasure. ☆ Bri (talk) 00:37, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

WikiCup 2023 November newsletter

This week's article for improvement (week 45, 2023)

The Signpost: 6 November 2023

"Is this an ArbCom case request or an M. Night Shyamalan movie?"
Plus Gaza bias, Speaker Johnson, Maher, the music of websites, and antisemitism.
And three new admins!
You should learn some of our rules!
The winner is...
Do you ever wonder where Wikipedia articles come from?
And other new research findings.
Only literally.
A systematic approach.
Plus Kollywood, Killers of the Flower Moon, and ongoing war.

Administrators' newsletter – November 2023

Nomination of Tiger Queens: The Tiger King Musical for deletion

Resolved
Hey all you cool cats and kittens! ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:41, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: October 2023

This week's article for improvement (week 46, 2023)

Drag queens

A WCNA Barncompass for you!

WCNA 2023 Barncompass
Thank you for all your contributions made towards Toronto as a result of WCNA 2023. I am awarding this barncompass to you. (Barncompass originated in Wikivoyage as a response to Wikipedia's barnstar. Since everyone travelled long distance for the conference and would have no doubt pulled out a map app at some point, awarding a barncompass is probably as fitting as a barnstar.) OhanaUnitedTalk page 18:22, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
@OhanaUnited Thank you! Likewise, your contributions related to Toronto have not gone unnoticed :) ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:56, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 47, 2023)

The Signpost: 20 November 2023

Comic-con, Media summit, and a classic!
Plus: Sockpuppet investigators asking for help.
Or if it's Indian sport or cinema.
And other new research findings.
Scholarship applications for Wikimania 2024 are now open!

Loosey LaDuca


@Baffle gab1978 Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 05:49, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Central Building (Seattle) for deletion

Resolved

I followed the AfD but it didn't look like it needed more keep votes. FYI there were some images and a little bit of text at MOHAI and UW's digital collections, I will put the links on the article's talkpage. If I make it over to the Seattle Public Library, I'll check the Seattle Room special collections. ☆ Bri (talk) 13:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Invite template for WP:LGBT (part 2)

Statue of Süreyya İlmen moved to draftspace

Please leave me alone. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:46, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 48, 2023)

Books & Bytes – Issue 59

Women in Red December 2023

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Recent edit reversion

Resolved
Resolved

The redirect Unsung Prophents and Dead Messiahs has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 30 § Unsung Prophents and Dead Messiahs until a consensus is reached. Or-Shalem (talk) 03:54, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

LGBT and Wikipedia

Your GA nomination of LGBT and Wikipedia

Resolved

Your GA nomination of LGBT and Wikipedia

The article LGBT and Wikipedia you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:LGBT and Wikipedia for comments about the article, and Talk:LGBT and Wikipedia/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Shushugah -- Shushugah (talk) 01:21, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

@Shushugah Thanks again! ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:23, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Good to see this is now GA. Well done!--Ipigott (talk) 08:51, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
@Ipigott Thank you! Following this article's development has been interesting. Much appreciation to the many editors who have contributed. ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:46, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 49, 2023)

Blueplate Lunch Counter and Soda Fountain

Blueplate Lunch Counter and Soda Fountain
Resolved

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Blueplate Lunch Counter and Soda Fountain you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of APK -- APK (talk) 05:42, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:36, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

The article Blueplate Lunch Counter and Soda Fountain you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Blueplate Lunch Counter and Soda Fountain for comments about the article, and Talk:Blueplate Lunch Counter and Soda Fountain/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of APK -- APK (talk) 04:21, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

@APK Thanks again for reviewing, and happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 12:05, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 December 2023

Just as his term was ending!
Plus Apple Pay, fiction, registration, expulsion, and elimination!
An analysis of a literary mystery.
Continuing years of efforts to improve free-to-read access.
"I think we ought to read only the kind of comics that wound or stab us. If the comic we're reading doesn't wake us up with a blow to the head, what are we reading for?" — Franz Kafka
And so are you.
Quite literally, and other fascinating featured articles, pictures and lists
If you don't fancy the sport that occupies over 25% of the slots in these lists, there's always movies, celebrities, and political follies to fall back on – or an unusual fired-for-the-weekend CEO.
This page in a nutshell: Whether or not someone has denied unsavory allegations — though such a denial may not merit being given equal weight in an article — a worthless shitpost should still be included.
Resolved

Template:WikiProject Black Lives Matter August 2020 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:14, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error

Administrators' newsletter – December 2023

Just leaving this here because i know some people have turned off pings ...

Any thoughts on User_talk:Sheila1988#April_TFAP? You were a co-nom at the FAC. - Dank (push to talk) 19:50, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

@Dank Thanks! Replied (I don't feel strongly either way.) Happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:52, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Stacy Layne Matthews

Your GA nomination of Stacy Layne Matthews

Stacy Layne Matthews
Resolved

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Stacy Layne Matthews you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of APK -- APK (talk) 00:01, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:02, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stacy Layne Matthews

The article Stacy Layne Matthews you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Stacy Layne Matthews for comments about the article, and Talk:Stacy Layne Matthews/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of APK -- APK (talk) 02:42, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks again! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:52, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors December 2023 Newsletter

This week's article for improvement (week 50, 2023)

This Month in GLAM: November 2023

Fat's Chicken and Waffles

Your GA nomination of Fat's Chicken and Waffles

Fat's Chicken and Waffles
Resolved

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fat's Chicken and Waffles you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of APK -- APK (talk) 11:23, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:08, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Fat's Chicken and Waffles

The article Fat's Chicken and Waffles you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fat's Chicken and Waffles for comments about the article, and Talk:Fat's Chicken and Waffles/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of APK -- APK (talk) 02:04, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks again! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:52, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Since you're quite the expert on local restaurants, does this article look promotional? I tried to avoid that, but every source was very positive. APK hi :-) (talk) 01:48, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

@APK I'm more of a content creator than a reviewer, as evidenced by my many GAs but lack of GA reviews. I've been accused of not including negative info in restaurant articles, but as long as the summary is representative of coverage then you should be fine. I would recommend asking for feedback, or even review, at WikiProject National Register of Historic Places. I think the project is generally active and there might be reviewers familiar with standards for NRHP-related restaurants. Happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:03, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Resolved

Seattle Coffee Works

Resolved
Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:03, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seattle Coffee Works has been accepted

Seattle Coffee Works, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 4% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DrowssapSMM 16:20, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Thanks! Much appreciated and happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:21, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Seattle Coffee Works

Seattle Coffee Works

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Seattle Coffee Works you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTWOrantula -- TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk) 02:23, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

@TrademarkedTWOrantula Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:36, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Seattle Coffee Works

The article Seattle Coffee Works you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Seattle Coffee Works for comments about the article, and Talk:Seattle Coffee Works/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTWOrantula -- TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk) 16:43, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

@TrademarkedTWOrantula Thanks again for reviewing! Happy Holidays and New Year! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:43, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Resolved

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Luna DuBois, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Tin Shed Garden Cafe

Your GA nomination of Tin Shed Garden Cafe

Tin Shed Garden Cafe

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tin Shed Garden Cafe you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTWOrantula -- TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk) 06:21, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! Looking forward to addressing your concerns. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:33, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tin Shed Garden Cafe

The article Tin Shed Garden Cafe you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tin Shed Garden Cafe for comments about the article, and Talk:Tin Shed Garden Cafe/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTWOrantula -- TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk) 05:43, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

@TrademarkedTWOrantula: Thanks again. I have a few more articles at WP:GAN if you're interested, otherwise happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 05:43, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Regent Bakery and Cafe

Your GA nomination of Regent Bakery and Cafe

Regent Bakery and Cafe

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Regent Bakery and Cafe you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTWOrantula -- TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk) 21:23, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Regent Bakery and Cafe

The article Regent Bakery and Cafe you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Regent Bakery and Cafe for comments about the article, and Talk:Regent Bakery and Cafe/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTWOrantula -- TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk) 00:42, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:43, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 51, 2023)

Seasons Greetings!

@Dr. Blofeld: Thank you, and likewise! Happy New Year ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:23, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Mistress Isabelle Brooks


Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Writer's Barnstar
You do great work with making articles better! Keep it up! DrowssapSMM 12:59, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
@DrowssapSMM Thank you! Much appreciated. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:16, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Nice work on Seattle Coffee Works! BuySomeApples (talk) 11:53, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
@BuySomeApples Thanks! I've nominated the article for Good status, which User:TrademarkedTWOrantula is currently reviewing. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:41, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

DiDa Ritz

Your GA nomination of DiDa Ritz

DiDa Ritz

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article DiDa Ritz you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thecheeseistalking98 -- Thecheeseistalking98 (talk) 17:22, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

@Thecheeseistalking98 Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:22, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of DiDa Ritz

The article DiDa Ritz you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:DiDa Ritz for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thecheeseistalking98 -- Thecheeseistalking98 (talk) 17:41, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

@Thecheeseistalking98: I hope you'll engage in the talk page discussion I've started, since I didn't even get a chance to address any of your concerns. ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:43, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
I've re-nominated because I believe the article meets GA criteria. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:45, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry. Sigh... ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:00, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2023

Wikipedia article histories are public records that can be easily examined, so unlike other websites, we can answer this question thoroughly.
Not the best of times for Wikipedians across the world, but there are still glimpses of hope...
Forky on forky on forky, plus a strange donation scheme and other interesting bits of news.
Wiki goes dark and adopts Palestine flag logo; intellectual property rumblings from the bowels of the law.
Wikimedia Russia closes after founder is declared a "foreign agent".
No more must Wikipedia always be a lightbulb in the dark — except metaphorically of course.
And other new research publications.
Peace on earth, goodwill to all!
the dilution makes it stronger.
The Signpost Crossword is a 2018 online multiplayer social deduction game that takes place in space-themed settings where players are colorful, armless cartoon astronauts.
Bollywood, Hollywood, and both kinds of football to close out December.
The debugging will continue until performance improves.
Heartwarming — MUST READ — You Won't BELIEVE #4!!!!!
Winner receives a special prize!
Edit summary: "Only need this page for about 30 minutes to demonstrate to a friend how easy it is to create a Wikipedia page. Then it will be deleted."

Happy Holidays

★Trekker (talk) 10:15, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

@StarTrekker Thanks! Happy holidays and New Year! ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:56, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 52, 2023)

Meetup in Seattle on 16 January 2024

Hi! Sorry for the Spanish: En la Wikipedia en español nos pusieron una plantilla de borrado en este artículo, lo que nos obligó a aumentar el contenido y referencias. ¿Podrías traer esa información aquí? Saludos! MiguelAlanCS (talk) 09:06, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

@MiguelAlanCS No need to apologize, but I'm limited in my ability to help. You might post a similar request for assistance at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Drag Race. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:59, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Daily Dozen Doughnut Company

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daily Dozen Doughnut Company has been accepted

Daily Dozen Doughnut Company, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dr vulpes (Talk) 19:34, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:40, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
For sure, and feel free to add back the content I removed. It wasn't bad or anything I just sort of felt it was a bit much but also didn't know if I should cut just a little or what. I hope I can visit that place next time I'm in the area. Dr vulpes (Talk) 20:35, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
@Dr vulpes Thanks, but I will let other editors worry about the Reception. I see User:7&6=thirteen might be restoring select text. I'm fine with whatever others think is best! Thanks again ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:39, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
World War I propaganda poster featuring The Salvation Army, which made doughnuts for soldiers in Europe.
Good job.
Keep your eye on the doughnut and not the hole. 7&6=thirteen () 20:12, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:15, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
@7&6=thirteen Thanks for your work on the article. I see the same couple of editors are already trying to crash the donut party. Disappointing and frustrating, but not surprising. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:29, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
WP:GNG should end the debate.
They lose sight of the benefit to readers. Endian controversy. Sad. 7&6=thirteen () 15:41, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

My plot to bribe you for doughnuts was foiled by @Dr vulpes. :( S0091 (talk) 20:29, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

You get a donut, you get a donut!
Next wiki conference I go to, I should bring dozens of donuts! ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:33, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
I support your proposal even though I will not personally benefit. I guess I must craft another plot to obtain some delicious fried dough. :) S0091 (talk) 20:48, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
@Dr vulpes and S0091: Hoping you can keep an eye on the article and talk page. Seems the same couple editors are trying to cancel the donut party already. Also putting this on User:Bbb23's and User:Liz's radar since they may recall how things unfolded last year. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:50, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Sorry, Bbb23, I meant to ping User:Blablubbs. My mistake. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:11, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Yet another Daily Dozen Doughnut Company thread

Can scarcely believe it's been more than a year since that surreal AfD... I'd placed the article on my watchlist and am glad to see it back in the mainspace again. Scope_creep's suggestion that you're an undisclosed paid editor (unless he had something or somebody else in mind when he said "The more time passes the more I think this editor is a UPE.") is definitely deserving of censure (at the very least!). Anyway, kudos to you and happy new year! KINGofLETTUCE 👑 🥬 20:03, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

@Kingoflettuce Don't hold your breath. This editor has made many similar comments about me in the past. I've been documenting and have plenty of receipts, and I've also told them to leave me alone many times. I'm not holding my breath the community will do anything about it, so I just ignore the BS and keep editing. Who knew little donuts could cause so much drama!? Happy New Year and happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:18, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red January 2024

Pings to ChristieBot

Hi -- I just got a ping (well, ChristieBot got the ping, and that pings me) from this edit, but I'm not sure what you were doing there -- are you just moving the notifications around? If so, it would be helpful if you'd drop (or {{noping}}) the mentions of ChristieBot to avoid pinging me unnecessarily. Thanks (and Happy New Year!) -- Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 21:03, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

@Mike Christie Sorry! I was just merging sections for organizational purposes, before an end-of-the-month archive. I thought "pings" only happened when new signatures were added, so apologies for the false alarms. Happy New Year and happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:07, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
You know, you're right -- they should only happen when new signatures are happening. My guess would be that if you move the section the algorithm doesn't realize it's only moving it and things you're actually writing a whole new section, so it adds a ping. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 21:25, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Comeback Seattle

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Comeback Seattle you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrademarkedTWOrantula -- TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk) 23:21, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:22, 31 December 2023 (UTC)