Hi Andrybak. Thank you for cleaning up after my work.[1][2] For me it's often a guess as to what is the optimal way to format such things so occasionally I just copy similar code from somewhere handy.
Regarding the content category Category:Occupational safety and health: I had added that to the new template category partly because I had just got through removing it from the existing navbox cat (now a subcat) here. But also I was under the impression that it was okay to include template-containing categories in content cats based on an RfC from a while back. I dug back and found it I think here but I must have either seriously misunderstood or misremembered something because that was not the consensus at all, or I was thinking of a different discussion. Anyway, you were correct to remove it. Well done:)
Possibly a helpful note on the shortcut link: I often get the feeling that, within my edit summaries, the shortcut "WP:CAT#T" gets ignored by editors who aren't aware of what those characters point to, or that they point to anything useful at all. "CAT#T" doesn't give much of a hint as to what it's about really. The # symbol nestled among the letters is an unusual shortcut. It's quite small and sometimes I think people think it's a typo or something. Lately, in my own personal experience, it seems the full "Wikipedia:Categorization#Template categorization" gets the attention desired and it's certainly far more descriptive. Even pipe-labeling the shortcut as "Template categorization", as I've been doing more recently, is better I think...fwiw --DB1729talk20:38, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
DB1729, thank you. Other editors not being familiar with the guideline and possibly being confused by the shortcut is an excellent observation. I've adjusted my scripts to make edit summaries more readable. —andrybak (talk) 21:18, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On your user page you say you've publicly revealed certain conflicts. I'm wondering if you've considered linking to such public statement(s). I've wrestled with maybe similar issues, as with "I'm an ex-banker" from 2012 on my user page. I'm less active with editing currently but appreciated your help with one of my recent edits, visited your user page, and had my old wrestling brought back to mind. Swliv (talk) 00:29, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello everyone, and welcome to the 26th issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter, covering all our favorite new and updated user scripts since 1 August 2024. At press time, over 94% of the world has legally fallen prey to the merry celebrations of "Christmas", and so shall you soon. It's been a quiet 4 months, and we hope to see you with way more new scripts next year. Happy holidays! Aaron Liu (talk) 05:06, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Got anything good? Tell us about your new, improved, old, or messed-up script here!
Very useful for changelist patrollers, DiffUndo, by Nardog, is this edition's featured script. Taking inspiration from WP:AutoWikiBrowser's double-click-to-undo feature, it adds an undo button to every line of every diff from "show changes", optimizing partial reverts with your favorite magic spell and nearly fulfilling m:Community Wishlist/Wishes/Partial revert undo.
Doğu/Adiutor, a recent WP:Twinkle/WP:RedWarn-like userscript that follows modern WMF UI design, is now an extension. However, its sole maintainer has left the project, which still awaits WMF mw:code stewardship (among some audits) to be installed on your favorite WMF wikis.
DannyS712, our former chief editor, has ascended to MediaWiki and the greener purpley pastures of PHP with commits creating Special:NamespaceInfo and the __EXPECTUNUSEDTEMPLATE__ magic word to exclude a template from Special:UnusedTemplates! I wonder if Wikipedia has a templaters' newsletter...
BilledMammal/Move+ needs updating to order list of pages handle lists of pages to move correctly regardless of the discussion's page, so that we may avoid repeating fiasco history.
Andrybak/Unsigned helper forks Anomie/unsignedhelper to add support for binary search, automatic edit summaries after generating the {{unsigned}} template, support for {{undated}}, and support for generating while syntax highlighting is on.
Polygnotus/Move+ updates BilledMammal's classic Move+ to add automattic watchlisting of all pages—except the target page(s)—changed while processing a move.
I have been working on improving the Thai Wikipedia's main page for the past year or so. Our inspiration, of course, comes from the English Wikipedia. I noticed that you have contributed to the page we based our work on, and we would greatly appreciate it if you could take some time to review our version of the code.
As we are a smaller wiki and the output from volunteer editors varies greatly over time, there is some deviation in the implementation of the FA and DYK sections. We decided not to set regular intervals for updates to these two sections, but rather to set release dates for the following month based on the content we have available in the current month. [If nothing is available to display, we show a message encouraging people to join our project as volunteer editors.]
Even after a year of working on this main page revamp, I only realized today that I have left an important technical loophole for the four pages (main/ -2 -1 +1 +2 days). It’s surprising to me that no one had noticed the broken pages until now.
My request is broken down into two specific questions:
Thank you in advance for your time and assistance!
PS.
@Patsagorn Y.: My colleague working on this project is just promoted to admin on Thai Wikipedia and this can possibly speed up our work. The progress was very slow in the past.
BTW, apologies for the temporary issue with Wikipedia:Main Page/Day before yesterday. I mistakenly saved the code on the English Wikipedia instead of the intended page on the Thai Wikipedia. I reverted the change within a minute. This experience has made me realize that it's better to seek help from someone who recently edited the page for this project.
I did not add the superfluous categories to my user page. If you want to do the work to find out how they got there, have at it. By the way, when I say My user page I mean the page I use to present information I wish to share. Did you use a bot or a script to make the edits? The editors of Wikipedia are people. Treat them as such. — Neonorange (talk to Phil) (he, they) 16:49, 31 January 2025 (UTC) —[reply]
Wikipedia uses a categorization system which aids its readers and editors. Categorization of a page is done by placing special wikitext: to place a page into category called "Example", the following wikitext needs to be placed into the page:
On categorized pages, the categories can be seen at the bottom of the page. Some categories are hidden from users by default. They can be shown by enabling the checkbox Preferences → Appearance → Advanced options → Show hidden categories.
Different categories are used for different kinds of pages:
Articles are put into categories based on encyclopedic topics, e.g. Biology.
Non-article pages are categorized into maintenance categories, e.g. for templates: Sports sidebar templates
Instructional pages are put into the category tree of Category:Wikipedia help. For example, the page Help:Category is currently placed into four visible categories:
Pages which don't align with the intended contents of a category shouldn't be put into that category. The page User:Neonorange has been incorrectly categorized into the following categories:
Addition of the following categories can be seen at the bottom of Special:Diff/1238902261, which is a copy of a portion of the page Wikipedia:Tip of the day, starting from the section "Alphabetical list of tips":
Thank you for the helpful reply. I see now that the collapsible help file pointers that I copy/pasted to my user page had categories embedded. I had not checked that new categories had been added. Thank you again for being patient. — Neonorange (talk to Phil) (he, they) 03:09, 1 February 2025 (UTC) —[reply]
Thank you, but no. I guess I have been using HotCat so long I had forgotten that adding categories to a page was no more involver than adding the Wikitext. Good weather and sunshine to you. — Neonorange (talk to Phil) (he, they) 17:28, 1 February 2025 (UTC) —[reply]
Your recent change to Wikipedia:Database reports is not behaving in the way I think was intended. Instead of it stating the time/datestamp of the last update to Linked misspellings, it's repeating the contents of that page, This table is generated by querying... etc to the database page when the LM table is empty. When LM table is populated, it's reporting nothing. Would you have a look at that and adjust? Thank you, Zinnober9 (talk) 17:39, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the reply and looking into this. Sorry it wasn't something simple. Glad the issue has been identified and hope the SDZeroBot footer is adjusted in the next few days. Cheers, Zinnober9 (talk) 21:40, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Idrk why you did this but why'd you edit my user page, just curious you might say something was wrong with the template but how'd you even find my user page? SpainMMAfan123 (talk) 04:58, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia uses a categorization system which aids its readers and editors. Categorization of a page is done by placing special wikitext: to place a page into category called "Example", the following wikitext needs to be placed into the page:
Pages which don't align with the intended contents of a category shouldn't be put into that category. The page User:SpainMMAfan123 has been incorrectly categorized into the Category:User templates spa in the edit Special:Diff/1283063785. This happened because instead of using wikitext {{User spa-3}}, which would tranclude the template, the whole wikitext of the Template:User spa-3 has been copy-pasted onto the page.
The clear intent of the cinema userbox was to place my user page in the category of film fans. (The userbox was adapted from a central source.) Your recent editing did not achieve this categorization, unfortunately. Since you begin a revision process, would you mind completing it? Thanks much. Pac Veten (talk) 15:26, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not having received a reply after today's unexpected edit to my user page, I have added the 'film' user category directly. If you have any further concerns, please get in touch via my talk page, and I'll be glad to handle any suggestions that you might provide. Thanks much for your help. Pac Veten (talk) 16:30, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Let's avoid circling where possible in this thread, if you wouldn't mind. Looking forward, if you have any suggestions for improving my home page, just let me know. I'm open to new ideas! Pac Veten (talk) 17:33, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Please see the Category:Statistics sidebar templates page. These two pages which I had omitted look really odd. (I actually came to these articles from that page.)
Got anything good? Tell us about your new, improved, old, or messed-up script here!
Featured script
Miscellaneous
Improve a script
Requested scripts
Updated scripts
Newly maintained scripts
New scripts
Show hidden categories.