Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates
📽️ Media
|
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Adding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Nominations are time-sensitive and for one-time use only. An automatic clock starts as soon as they are created. Do not create them in advance, save them for later or re-activate them. Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using
An 'Alternative' is created by adding a sub-section to the nomination page: ====Alternative==== VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 100 constructive, stable edits on Commons (excluding user and talk pages) can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
| |||||||||||||||||||
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 12 Jan 2026 at 16:54:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Palaces#Germany
Info Fountain at Seehof Castle in Memmelsdorf near Bamberg, orthophoto. Distance to the ground approx. 100 m. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 16:54, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Ermell (talk) 16:54, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
File:Ceiling and Calligraphy of Bibi-Khanym Mausoleum (Мавзолей Биби Ханум, Bibixonim maqbarasi).jpg
Voting period ends on 12 Jan 2026 at 09:27:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#Uzbekistan
Info Ceiling and Calligraphy of Bibi-Khanym Mausoleum (Мавзолей Биби Ханум,Bibixonim maqbarasi). My work. -- Mile (talk) 09:27, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 09:27, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Interesting compo and subject. JayCubby (talk) 15:53, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 20:34, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2026 at 21:38:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Doors
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:38, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:38, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
*{{o}} It might be QI because the sharpness is good, but I'm not sure because the detail isn't good enough. I think it's below what you'd expect from an FP image. Why wov? --Lmbuga (talk) 22:55, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- I’m unsure why do you think the detail isn’t good enough when the ornaments are clearly visible at full size (even the curves around the greened areas of the copper can be carefully observed). As for the wow factor, this is an unusual example of an Eastern Orthodox Church door with neo-Baroque decoration, and the motif is missing from the FP category. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 05:32, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
- I'm sorry. I may be mistaken. Now I have a better impression: I withdraw my vote--Lmbuga (talk) 15:52, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2026 at 19:25:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Astronomy#Others
Info created by Mike Peel – uploaded by Mike Peel – nominated by Mike Peel -- Mike Peel (talk) 19:25, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Mike Peel (talk) 19:25, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2026 at 19:18:30 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Astronomy#Others
Info created by Mike Peel – uploaded by Mike Peel – nominated by Mike Peel -- Mike Peel (talk) 19:18, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Mike Peel (talk) 19:18, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice capture of a huge structure. JayCubby (talk) 20:08, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 21:14, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:20, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 00:25, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 06:50, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 10:35, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 18:58, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2026 at 17:50:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Ascidiacea
Info Lollipop tunicate (Nephtheis fascicularis), Anilao, Philippines. Note: there are no FPs on Commos of genus Nephtheis. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 17:50, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 17:50, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support The diversity of marine life is incredible. Diego manages to capture it all very well, though. JayCubby (talk) 18:03, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 18:24, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support per JayCubby. Yann (talk) 19:54, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:07, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:19, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 00:24, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 03:07, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 06:50, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Kingshuk Mondal (talk) 13:40, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2026 at 16:25:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/1900s#1940-1949
Info created by Russell Lee, restored by Adam Cuerden, uploaded and nominated by Yann
Support I cropped the left and right sides. I think it makes a much better composition. -- Yann (talk) 16:25, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Question At Wikipedia FPC, there was a comment:- 'it's an image taken by a renowned photographer, imposing our own crop on it may be antithetical to our values'. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:06, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- The framing at the time of shooting is rarely the same as that of the final print. Whether the photographer is renowned or not doesn't change it. Yann (talk) 19:47, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Very high quality even for such old photo and nice composition Юрий Д.К. 06:49, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 11:27, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 20:14, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2026 at 11:54:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Mitridae
Info created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 11:54, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 11:54, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 15:23, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 16:20, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:07, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:19, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 23:59, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Thi (talk) 01:06, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mile (talk) 09:31, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:47, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Beautiful and encyclopedic documentation. JayCubby (talk) 19:50, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Wonderful! Wolverine X-eye 19:58, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2026 at 09:42:51 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Trogonidae_(Trogons)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:42, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:42, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:56, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:32, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Very nice bird, impressive composition and image quality! I wonder if it would be possible to eliminate (or minimize) the distracting bright bokeh in the background of the bird's head. It would be perfect! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:55, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review. The bokeh comes from the sky behind the leafs in the background. I personally like it so I'm not removing it sorry. Also, even if I wanted to do it, it might be quite complicated because very tiny feathers are in front of one of the bokeh balls -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:58, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Great feather detail, exquisitely vibrant colors, and a good background. How long do you spend editing each photo? JayCubby (talk) 12:56, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you! It depends of each photo. It can go from 1 second to 1 hour (in cases where I have to reedit the image multiple times from the start) but I'd say the average is 2-5 minuts per image. What takes the most time is always selecting the best pictures because I often take around 30'000 to 40'000 pictures on a trip (I often use burst shooting to always be sure to have the best possible animal position amongst the photos and for birds in flight I use the 30 images per second burst speed). I still have to catch up with some pictures taken years ago but I now have a much better and faster selecting technic for my latest photos by rating the best one directly from the camera to easily find them again. Using this I selected all best pictures of Namibia out of 30-40k pictures in only 1 week -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:07, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Very nice. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:56, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 15:20, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 15:23, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 15:28, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 16:22, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 19:58, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 20:24, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:42, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 22:38, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Strong support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 03:08, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 06:48, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Sharp from hair to tail. Colors. --Mile (talk) 09:32, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2026 at 07:38:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Geology and chemistry#Organic chemical compounds
Info created by Janeklass – uploaded by Janeklass – nominated by Janeklass -- Janeklass (talk) 07:38, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Janeklass (talk) 07:38, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 08:45, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:58, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Very well done! Thank you for the detailed explanation of the process on the filedesc. JayCubby (talk) 15:04, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support That's something I've never seen before. --Petro Stelte (talk) 15:22, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 16:24, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Oh that's good. Wolverine X-eye 18:07, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 19:55, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Cool. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:41, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support 1st i thought its Predator mask. You saw it before Petro Stelte. Just background could be more mild color. --Mile (talk) 09:34, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 17:06, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Jan 2026 at 05:45:20 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Switzerland
Info Röm.-Kath. Kirche Falera Herz-Jesu Kirche, main altar. In my eyes a simple but atmospheric altar.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:45, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:45, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 08:45, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 15:21, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 16:27, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:18, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:08, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice and soft lighting. JayCubby (talk) 15:56, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jan 2026 at 18:57:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Single_stained_glass_windows
Info The stained-glass window depicted is the n° 11 of the Basilica of Notre-Dame in Geneva. Specifically, It depicts The Nativity of Jesus. It was created and installed in 1915 by the artist Charles Brunner. C.U.N. by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 18:57, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 18:57, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 00:21, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 02:42, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:54, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:00, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:36, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 15:20, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 19:56, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:18, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Exceptionally appealing atmosphere, with the surrounding space around the window forming a refined harmony of mood, pattern, and color. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:40, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Crop is weird but quality and drawing is great. --Mile (talk) 09:30, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
- The window is not centered between the two columns, and the only angle for photography is again slightly off-center. On the other hand, I made an overlay of images from bottom to top from about 20 meters away with telezoom, forcing the widest possible aperture to obtain this type of texture. Terragio67 (talk) 12:58, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Good HDR use. JayCubby (talk) 19:51, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jan 2026 at 16:22:20 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United_States#Arizona
Info Sandstone rock formation in the Vermilion Cliffs National Monument, Arizona, United States. Created by Romain Guy, uploaded/nominated by me Юрий Д.К. 16:22, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 16:22, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Rhythmic wave-like rock formation, warm light brings out texture and depth, composition and framing highlight its natural patterns. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:39, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 20:08, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support I agree with Radomianin. --Petro Stelte (talk) 02:38, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:50, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:00, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:36, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 19:57, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 22:39, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 02:49, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jan 2026 at 15:23:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Sky
Info created by DESI Collaboration/DOE/KPNO/NOIRLab/NSF/AURA/L. Tyas, uploaded by OptimusPrimeBot, nominated by Yann
Info Kitt Peak National Observatory, Arizona, beneath star trails.
Support -- Yann (talk) 15:23, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support JayCubby (talk) 15:45, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 15:47, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 16:35, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 16:46, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Good to have it :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 17:10, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- vip (talk) 19:33, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 20:09, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:21, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 02:36, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:41, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Wow -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:50, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:35, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Wow power. Amazing! DimiTalen 13:41, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 15:21, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 16:20, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 20:26, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Reputable scientific source; impressive long-exposure star trail. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:51, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 22:40, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jan 2026 at 14:37:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications/Germany#Bavaria
Info Greifenstein Castle near Heiligenstadt in Upper Franconia, aerial view. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 14:37, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Ermell (talk) 14:37, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 15:19, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:23, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:25, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 16:30, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Very good idea to take the photo at ‘eye level’ with the castle; nice light, not too harsh. – Aristeas (talk) 16:56, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:01, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 18:32, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 20:10, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 02:36, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:41, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:49, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:35, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:55, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 16:05, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 20:27, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:21, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jan 2026 at 14:12:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements
Info A fence made of canes and rusty wire. Long live minimalism! All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:12, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:12, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 15:10, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support. Can I
Request GPS coordinates? JayCubby (talk) 15:21, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Done Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:34, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- Valeu. JayCubby (talk) 15:47, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:23, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Something different for a change. --Petro Stelte (talk) 02:35, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:49, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:33, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Hello, it’s been a while. --Laitche (talk) 19:04, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:08, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jan 2026 at 14:06:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Giraffidae_(Giraffes)
Info Happy new year everyone!
Info Created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:06, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:06, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:10, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 14:23, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 15:07, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 15:10, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support! JayCubby (talk) 15:19, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:23, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:24, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Bwag (talk) 16:21, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 16:47, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:01, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Synchronized movements forming a twin-like visual echo, with natural light and timing giving clarity and warmth. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:31, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 20:07, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 22:57, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:48, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 02:33, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:49, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:33, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 15:21, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 15:29, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jan 2026 at 13:37:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Germany
Info created by New York-air – uploaded by New York-air – nominated by New York-air -- New York-air (talk) 13:37, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- New York-air (talk) 13:37, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Beautiful fireworks! Юрий Д.К. 16:29, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 17:05, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Super, dass Du dabei warst ;) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 17:11, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:27, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Comment Original is better, crop to tight here. --Mile (talk) 17:48, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:49, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jan 2026 at 08:58:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Palaces#Russia
Info Skyscraper on Kotelnicheskaya Embankment from Kosmodamianskaya Embankment, full view of facade. My photo Юрий Д.К. 08:58, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 08:58, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Beautiful. --Petro Stelte (talk) 10:51, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 11:55, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:05, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 15:04, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Bwag (talk) 16:20, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:00, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Stalinovka i suppose. One of 7 ? --Mile (talk) 17:47, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, it is Stalinist architecture. I hope to create FPs for all 7 buildings :) Юрий Д.К. 19:05, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Юрий Д.К. than you will have to care to aviod high-noon light/colors, depend of shadows too. This could have more soft colors/light. Would help you more but i miss geolocation. --Mile (talk) 09:38, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Done Coords added. Юрий Д.К. 09:55, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Support It's very useful to have a well-made image of the entire building, not just the popular view of its corner part with the tower. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:47, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:48, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:48, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:31, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:42, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 22:41, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jan 2026 at 06:50:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Species_:_Vulpes_vulpes_(Red_Foxes)
Info This image depicts an Ezo Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes schrencki), a subspecies distributed in Japan. It was taken in its natural habitat in Hokkaido. The image is of good quality, and there is currently no Featured Picture of this subspecies on Wikimedia Commons. created by MIKI Yoshihito – uploaded by Ahad.F – nominated by Ahad.F -- Ahad.F (talk) 06:50, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Ahad.F (talk) 06:50, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 15:12, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:27, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Good as thumb but not so sharp. --Mile (talk) 17:53, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 20:28, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose Nice, but not QI or FP IMO, blurry--Lmbuga (talk) 00:55, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose per Lmbuga – Julian Lupyan (talk) 03:09, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Jan 2026 at 03:54:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People#Others.
Info created by Lmbuga – uploaded by Lmbuga – nominated by Lmbuga -- Lmbuga (talk) 03:54, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Info Taken in 2014. "Childrens in danger, and granite rocks on the beach of San Vicente do Mar, O Grove, Galicia, Spain".
Comment The picture was downscaled so that the standing child could not be recognized. --Lmbuga (talk) 04:43, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Lmbuga (talk) 03:54, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -Petro Stelte (talk) 10:52, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 16:48, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:27, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:03, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Jan 2026 at 21:26:57 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Greece
Info created by Petro Stelte – uploaded by Petro Stelte – nominated by Petro Stelte -- Petro Stelte (talk) 21:26, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support I wish you all a happy new year. -- Petro Stelte (talk) 21:26, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment Some CA visible. JayCubby (talk) 21:32, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
- How far did you zoom in to see that? Petro Stelte (talk) 21:39, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
- 1:1 JayCubby (talk) 00:41, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- JayCubby I tried removing the CA. Would that be better? [1] Petro Stelte (talk) 16:33, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
- 1:1 JayCubby (talk) 00:41, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- How far did you zoom in to see that? Petro Stelte (talk) 21:39, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support It seems good to me, but at 1:1, I've seen more obvious minor CAs right at the end of the handrails (In the lower area of the angled handrails). --Lmbuga (talk) 04:26, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Lmbuga I tried removing the CA. Would that be better? [2] Petro Stelte (talk) 17:11, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, I fail to see anything special here, no wow. —kallerna (talk) 09:03, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:12, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:15, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:09, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support I find the scene interesting – Julian Lupyan (talk) 16:48, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:59, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support I love these Greek rock chapels, and the photo shows the dared location of that sanctuary very impressively. – Aristeas (talk) 17:35, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support as per Julian and Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:25, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Remembers this chapel on Fuerteventura --Llez (talk) 11:01, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- That's a very nice photo. Petro Stelte (talk) 15:25, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, it's a beautiful photo, but it's much more difficult to take than it looks. It's quite an achievement.--Lmbuga (talk) 00:02, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
- That's a very nice photo. Petro Stelte (talk) 15:25, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Info I have uploaded a new version in which I have removed the CA. I hope you all agree. --Petro Stelte (talk) 19:17, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Jan 2026 at 21:11:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Historical/People#1890-1899
Info created by an unknown author – restored and uploaded by JayCubby – nominated by JayCubby -- JayCubby (talk) 21:11, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support It's a very crisp print. The NPG takes good care of their collections. -- JayCubby (talk) 21:11, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support-- Ahad.F (talk) 03:02, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 04:19, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 08:53, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -Petro Stelte (talk) 10:52, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:59, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:08, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:44, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:58, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Good photo and restoration. – Aristeas (talk) 17:33, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:43, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:58, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 23:31, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 05:46, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Jan 2026 at 20:50:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Abstract
Info Light through a window and venetian blinds, making shadows. Posted on Flickr by author Sheila Sund. Created by Sheila Sund – uploaded from Flickr by Jon Kolbert – nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 20:50, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment First I placed this photo under "Photo techniques/Black and White#Objects"... but I think "Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Abstract" is a better choice. What do you think? Zquid (talk) 20:50, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Zquid (talk) 20:50, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Low quality for such an easy shot, overprocessed —kallerna (talk) 09:04, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:12, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:08, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice find! Very interesting abstract(ish) composition. Both the limited DoF and B&W harmonize with that subject and help to emphasize its abstract beauty. B&W images often work well with more contrast and sharpening than colour photos, IMHO the processing is appropriate. – Aristeas (talk) 17:32, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Convincing use of light geometry. The interplay of window light and blinds creates a balanced, almost architectural abstraction. Black and white strengthens structure and visual tension. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:23, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:35, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 20:10, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose 1- The area in focus is the central upper part, and it's full of hot pixels, in my opinion (evaluate after reading point 4). 2- The picture is oversharpened, IMO. 3- Wov?, why?, beacuse it's rare. 4- The picture seems downscalled: 2,048 × 2,048 pixels and Canon EOS 5D Mark III, not with 4 like the picture, with 22,3 megapixels. --Lmbuga (talk) 01:10, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Jan 2026 at 17:35:55 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues outdoors
Info Created, uploaded, and nominated by Julian Lupyan – Julian Lupyan (talk) 17:35, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Info I found the difference in lighting between the statue and the background interesting, as the subject is in almost cold shadow, while the background is brightly sunlit. As I have been disclaiming, this was taken with my former camera so there is a slight lack of detail, and I'm hoping that the local sharpening, the scene, and some of the textures I found appealing can compensate. – Julian Lupyan (talk) 17:35, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 17:35, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support per nom. JayCubby (talk) 21:15, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 04:40, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Statue is is shade and OOF. I fail to see the speciality in this composition. —kallerna (talk) 09:06, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:11, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support It seems someone didn't have a good start to the new year. --Petro Stelte (talk) 10:49, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:14, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:58, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:57, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Often the main subject of a photo is bright and the background is darker, but of course it also works the other way around, like here – the statue nicely stands out against the architecture, also because the sculpture appears a bit more bluish that the dark areas of the background. – Aristeas (talk) 17:27, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Agree with Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:40, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Per kallerna, the subject innshadow in the front with the lit columns in the back doesn't work for mw Poco a poco (talk) 22:43, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Jan 2026 at 12:31:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Duos (depictions of two people)
Info Noon - Rest from Work (after Millet) (1890). Oil on canvas. Musée d'Orsay, Paris. By Vincent van Gogh. Created by Vincent van Gogh – uploaded by Xijky (User:Claritas) – nominated by Zquid -- Zquid (talk) 12:31, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Zquid (talk) 12:31, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 15:01, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 08:58, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support because this more vividly colored version accentuates Van Gogh's expressive color and emotional intensity, whereas the restrained museum scan presents them in a subtler, less striking way. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:35, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 11:02, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:56, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:08, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:43, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:56, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin’s assessment. – Aristeas (talk) 17:25, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 20:05, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 20:34, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:36, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:43, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:57, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 15:30, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Jan 2026 at 10:10:18 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Boats
Info created by Kingshuk Mondal – uploaded by Kingshuk Mondal – nominated by Herpking -- Kingshuk Mondal (talk) 10:10, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kingshuk Mondal (talk) 10:10, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Not sharp, and the sky is grainy. --heylenny (talk/edits) 15:14, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 20:23, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Jan 2026 at 10:01:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#France
Info created by DimiTalen – uploaded by DimiTalen – nominated by DimiTalen -- DimiTalen 10:01, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support I would like to nominate this photo, my first FP nomination. It's been assessed Valued and Quality, and I think it meets all the necessary criteria. -- DimiTalen 10:01, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 15:03, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Being selected for FP on a first nomination is quite challenging, but as far as I can see, there are no issues with this photo. Having your first nomination on the last day of 2025 makes it a memorable moment. I wish you a good year in 2026. Welcome to FPC! --Laitche (talk) 01:26, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support-- Ahad.F (talk) 02:18, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:00, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:11, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support as per Laitche. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:39, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:52, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:08, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:43, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Excellent panorama. Some of the buildings are, ahem, a matter of taste, but as part of this panorama with snow and sun they look beautiful. Detail resolution could be higher; seems that ƒ/10 already introduced noticeable diffraction on the APS-C/DX sensor, or the lens is not the sharpest one. – Aristeas (talk) 17:23, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:37, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:44, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 20:23, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 23:26, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Jan 2026 at 06:41:57 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Nectariniidae (Sunbirds_and_Spiderhunters)
Info No FP of Cinnyris hellmayri. created by Saudi Press Agency – uploaded by Ahad.F – nominated by Ahad.F -- Ahad.F (talk) 06:41, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ahad.F (talk) 06:41, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment Had you noticed this photo? Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:31, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, I did. Ahad.F (talk) 15:06, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Charlesjsharp and Ahad.F: This one should be nominated too, IMO. heylenny (talk/edits) 16:15, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
- I agree, another beautiful image of this bird. Ahad.F (talk) 16:23, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 15:12, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Needs much tighter crop. —kallerna (talk) 09:07, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Kallerna A new version with a tighter crop has been uploaded. Thank you Ahad.F (talk) 15:39, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks! It is better, but the bird still forms only maybe 5% of the image area. —kallerna (talk) 19:24, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- I see. I avoided cropping further to prevent loss of image quality, but I can upload a more tightly cropped version if needed. Ahad.F (talk) 01:47, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks! It is better, but the bird still forms only maybe 5% of the image area. —kallerna (talk) 19:24, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:11, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:17, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Agree with kallerna Poco a poco (talk) 18:05, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for your feedback, @Poco a poco and Kallerna: I uploaded a more tightly cropped version! Ahad.F (talk) 22:48, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 09:06, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 9 Jan 2026 at 01:17:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Coraciiformes#Genus : Alcedo
Info Common kingfisher of Ōizumi Ryokuchi Park, Osaka. c/u/n by Laitche (talk) 01:17, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Laitche (talk) 01:17, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:12, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:04, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 11:51, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 14:35, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment We have 15 FPs of this species. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:45, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Charlesjsharp: I’m aware of that too. For me, the key criterion for nomination is whether the photo’s approach or idea stands out from many others. I don’t see the number of subjects as an issue. If we start treating numbers as a problem, the same issue would arise with many subjects, not just kingfishers. Most importantly, however, the decision should be made by the voters, not by the nominator. --Laitche (talk) 21:07, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
- I absolutely agree it is important that 'the photo’s approach or idea stands out from many others' (as your current FP does). "Value – our main goal is to feature most valuable pictures from all others". Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:59, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Charlesjsharp: I’m aware of that too. For me, the key criterion for nomination is whether the photo’s approach or idea stands out from many others. I don’t see the number of subjects as an issue. If we start treating numbers as a problem, the same issue would arise with many subjects, not just kingfishers. Most importantly, however, the decision should be made by the voters, not by the nominator. --Laitche (talk) 21:07, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 15:16, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support though, as per Charles, we have lots of FPs of this species. JayCubby (talk) 21:14, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Not among our best Common kingfisher images —kallerna (talk) 09:08, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Weak support Юрий Д.К. 10:58, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:47, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:17, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 16:50, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Love the composition with the long curved branch starting in the top-left corner. – Aristeas (talk) 17:18, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 18:55, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 23:19, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Jan 2026 at 21:14:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Uzbekistan
Info Ark of Bukhara (Цитадель Арк, Buxoro arki), Uzbekistan. My shot.-- Mile (talk) 21:14, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 21:14, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:11, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:23, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 14:34, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 15:07, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support JayCubby (talk) 21:14, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:10, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 12:29, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:46, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 16:50, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:45, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 23:20, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Jan 2026 at 09:51:33 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes/Hirundinidae#Genus : Progne
Info No FPs of this species. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:51, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:51, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:00, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:38, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 13:53, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Bwag (talk) 16:11, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 17:01, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful! Wolverine X-eye 19:34, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Pretty bird and amazing sharpness and detail! Look at the reflection in its eye! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:41, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 06:05, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support-- Ahad.F (talk) 06:14, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Clean and nice shot with proper catch light on eye. -- Kingshuk Mondal (talk) 12:53, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 14:34, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 15:19, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:50, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 05:00, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:10, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:45, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 17:16, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support ! -- Terragio67 (talk) 20:03, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:24, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 15:23, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 22:56, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Jan 2026 at 09:02:19 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Cemeteries#Estonia
Info created & uploaded by MairiKaseorg – nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 09:02, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 09:02, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Great documentary work, well-composed and sharp. I feel like some kind of category of archaeologists at work should be added. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:43, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: Are you sure it's sharp? I can barely see what the person is holding (and it's big). I assume it's a tape measure or something like that. heylenny (talk/edits) 15:28, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Nice documentary photo, but it is too grainy when you zoom in on it. --heylenny (talk/edits) 15:21, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent documentation. Detail level is OK for a drone shot. MHO it’s sharp enough. The missing details in the measuring tape or surveyor's staff (correctly mentioned by heylenny) can probably be explained by the fact that the instrument is almost, but not completely horizontal – therefore the details on the instrument come into conflict with the pixel pattern of the camera sensor and get lost. I have seen similar phenomena in other photos. – Aristeas (talk) 17:16, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:26, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Jan 2026 at 09:02:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Comets
Info created & uploaded by FoxBill – nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 09:02, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 09:02, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Great scene and really well captured; no-brainer to support in my opinion. Its filename should be edited for spelling after the voting period is over. I'd like to know what the streak toward the upper right is. If you know, FoxBill, please add it. (Also, a small quibble: I'm pretty sure the information "6 10 sek 35 mm image" in the Description - which I thank you for providing to us - is "6 10-second 35-mm images", or at least that's how I'd write it [or optionally sec for second], though standard photographic abbreviations might be different.) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:51, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 22:59, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Wobbanight (talk) 23:35, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 14:32, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:01, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 12:29, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:44, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:54, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:38, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 22:53, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Jan 2026 at 06:18:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Domestic cats
Info Tabby cats (Red Tabby and Brown Tabby) in Osaka, Japan. c/u/n by Laitche (talk) 06:18, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Laitche (talk) 06:18, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:30, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:36, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice. Do you remember what they were looking at? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:40, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
- Pretty woman walking down the street. Petro Stelte (talk) 08:51, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Petro Stelte: It distracted me, and I struggled to focus on the viewfinder. --Laitche (talk) 20:33, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: I don’t know their relationship, but the two were very close and walked in sync. The red tabby was particularly friendly and came up to rub against me after I took this. --Laitche (talk) 13:21, 30 December 2025 (UTC) <P.S. I think they were just instinctively wary of their surroundings. --Laitche (talk) 19:26, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 08:48, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:52, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 13:12, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 06:10, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 14:32, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 15:19, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 17:17, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Cute, and the slightly different postures together with the views into the same direction are great. – Aristeas (talk) 18:15, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:03, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:43, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:42, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 20:02, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 15:30, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 22:51, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 8 Jan 2026 at 04:25:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes/United States#California
Info created by Don – uploaded & nominated by Don -- (talk) 04:25, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Don (talk)
Support This 10-year-old photo is not huge, but it's good to me. I enjoy moving my eyes around it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:42, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 15:08, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support per Ikan JayCubby (talk) 19:29, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 12:28, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 22:50, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Jan 2026 at 22:03:05 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#People.
Info created by Lmbuga – uploaded by Lmbuga – nominated by Lmbuga -- Lmbuga (talk) 22:03, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Info Taken in 2005 (It's a dare to nominate a photo from 2005!). Title: "Aren't you going to ignore me?": Needing the attention of a father who is playing with a camera.--Lmbuga (talk) 22:03, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Lmbuga (talk) 22:03, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support. It's an upscale (could you please upload the original image and revert it, for archival purposes?), buta high-quality one. I didn't have high expectations for a 2005 P&S, but this is good enough for my
{{Support}}. JayCubby (talk) 22:28, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
:*
|
Support Good portrait. So he's like 24 years old now. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:35, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
- Yes. Exactly. But I wish that at least on Sundays he could be four years old again.--Lmbuga (talk) 09:05, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 08:49, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:49, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 15:02, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:08, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Strong support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 17:19, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Moving. – Aristeas (talk) 18:13, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:04, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:53, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 20:02, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 7 Jan 2026 at 14:50:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
Info created and uploaded by Roy Egloff – nominated by Mahan -- Mahan (talk) 14:50, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Mahan (talk) 14:50, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 15:53, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 16:05, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice detail of a nifty device. I did some Googling, and the Smartflowers are around 3 times more expensive than conventional PV panels, though produce maybe 40% more power (due to sun tracking) per watt. More moving parts though. I wouldn't expect it to last decades like other panels JayCubby (talk) 18:41, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:39, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 22:54, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:49, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:51, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent and interesting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:36, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:47, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 12:33, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Bwag (talk) 16:12, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 14:31, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 15:02, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 18:13, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:08, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:41, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 20:01, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 22:46, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 03:11, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jan 2026 at 22:48:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Brazil
Info created and uploaded by MartinKlippel – nominated by Heylenny -- heylenny (talk/edits) 22:48, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- heylenny (talk/edits) 22:48, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:44, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 05:06, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:07, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Too dark, bit weird choice with 1:1 aspect ratio —kallerna (talk) 08:32, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- Woke up like this uh? heylenny (talk/edits) 04:07, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose per Kallerna. It feels a little bit claustrophobic to me with the square crop. The blacks seem a little too dark, and I think there is something off about the colors. Maybe the white balance skews too cold? – Julian Lupyan (talk) 16:57, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jan 2026 at 19:45:49 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige
Info View from the Schneespitze in the Stubai Alps to Agglsspitze, Feuerstein and the Feuerstein Glacier. All y me. -- Milseburg (talk) 19:45, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 19:45, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:26, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 22:56, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:07, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:44, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 08:48, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:01, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 21:24, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment Is the snow overall reddish for real or a WB issue? Poco a poco (talk) 22:52, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Good quality, just not that striking composition. Is it tilted? —kallerna (talk) 08:35, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jan 2026 at 13:51:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Pomacentridae_(Clownfish_and_Damselfish)
Info Tomato clownfish (Amphiprion frenatus) in a magnificent sea anemone (Heteractis magnifica), Anilao, Philippines. Note: there are yet no FPs of this species on Commons. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 13:51, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 13:51, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:54, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 16:21, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:04, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Finding nemo :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:39, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:28, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 23:01, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 23:54, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 04:20, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:08, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:54, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 04:52, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Not the best POV, compare etc. to this —kallerna (talk) 08:37, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:18, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support {{Weak s}}I love the composition because it's original and different from other pictures. I like the luminosity of the fish.But I dislike the blue line surrounding the edges of the white stripe.--Lmbuga (talk) 15:34, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Removed Poco a poco (talk) 19:36, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- Thankyou very much--Lmbuga (talk) 20:41, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:40, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jan 2026 at 11:04:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#China
Info all by me.
Kawagarbo, is the highest peak of Meili Snow Mountain (standard name Taizi (Prince) Snow Mountains), which rises to 6,740 metres, and holds the highest point of Yunnan Province, China. It is located at the border between Deqin County, Diqing Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Yunnan Province, and Zayu County, Nyingchi City, Tibet Autonomous Region, China, and constitutes an important component of the UNESCO World Heritage site Three Parallel Rivers of Yunnan Protected Areas. Kawagarbo has not been successfully summited. In 1991, a joint Chinese–Japanese mountaineering expedition suffered a fatal accident on Kawagarbo, resulting in the deaths of all 17 team members. This picture shows the eastern face of Kawagarbo, photographed at sunrise on 10 May 2025 from the Feilai Temple Viewing Platform in Deqin County. -- 瑞丽江的河水 (talk) 11:04, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Abstain as author. -- 瑞丽江的河水 (talk) 11:04, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 11:58, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:55, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 16:23, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment Minor crop above ? Some 100-150px. --Mile (talk) 16:35, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:05, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment In my eyes there is too much empty sky at the top. --Milseburg (talk) 19:48, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
- Hi, I have cropped some top sky.--瑞丽江的河水 (talk) 22:15, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 22:50, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:45, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:53, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Mile (talk) 15:05, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support MZaplotnik(talk) 17:25, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Underexposed, not the most striking light for sunrise shot - see the category —kallerna (talk) 08:40, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- The golden light is not frequently to see unfortunately. Consider the cloud, a clear snow mountain itself is valuable I believe. 瑞丽江的河水 (talk) 20:21, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jan 2026 at 09:48:40 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Hamburg
Info created & uploaded by GZagatta – nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 09:48, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 09:48, 28 December 2025 (UTC)- Weak
Support Wonderful composition. I wish it would be sharper. --XRay 💬 10:14, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Weak support per XRay. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:02, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Support I think the sharpness is OK for a night photo. The compo is great. --heylenny (talk/edits) 22:53, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Atmospheric pre-dawn light, strong composition and lines. Slightly soft focus suits the mood while architecture and textures remain clear. -- Radomianin (talk) 23:42, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 04:21, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:09, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:45, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:49, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:37, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 14:31, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:38, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Neutral Per XRay + lack of perspective correction Poco a poco (talk) 22:43, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per Poco a poco: perspective correction. It is easily correctable--Lmbuga (talk) 02:32, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support per heylenny and Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 18:09, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:35, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Per Radomianin. Beautiful scene. – Julian Lupyan (talk) 16:51, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 11:28, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 22:38, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jan 2026 at 09:43:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Germany
Info created & uploaded by GZagatta – nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 09:43, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 09:43, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Support I love those interior buildings pictures. Very important for Wiki projects, we don't have enough of this pictures. We do not have enough of these photos of the interior of "civil" buildings (obvious private property problem), but they are rare, but allow us to show the interior layout of residential buildings and the decorations from different periods. The photo is a bit grainy, but I've seen worse on FPC. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:03, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I don't see a 'wow' here, sorry. Also, not sharp enough. heylenny (talk/edits) 22:55, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 04:21, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per Heylenny. This photo is indeed valuable, but I believe it's valuable as a VI/QI. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:44, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support MZaplotnik(talk) 17:23, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Very interesting architecture. Dynamic composition/perspective which IMHO fits the style of the building; especially impressive thanks to the views into the upper and lower floors, etc. – Aristeas (talk) 18:07, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per heylenny, dull light. —kallerna (talk) 08:41, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:19, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support I really like the picture and the composition. --Lmbuga (talk) 22:40, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jan 2026 at 01:12:51 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena/Weather#Fog
Info created and uploaded by LucioStabile – nominated by Heylenny -- heylenny (talk/edits) 01:12, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- heylenny (talk/edits) 01:12, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment That's poetic and reminds me somewhat of classic Japanese and Chinese art. However, there is a dust spot a bit below the upper left corner that needs to be eliminated. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:11, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek:
Dust spot removed. Thanks for the review. heylenny (talk/edits) 22:18, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Heylenny, you introduced some JPEG compression. Would you mind if I reworked it? JayCubby (talk) 23:21, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
- @JayCubby: Not at all! Feel free to do so! heylenny (talk/edits) 23:25, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Support I was waiting to see that edit, but I feel like this is good enough for me to support now. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:50, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
- @JayCubby: Not at all! Feel free to do so! heylenny (talk/edits) 23:25, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Heylenny, you introduced some JPEG compression. Would you mind if I reworked it? JayCubby (talk) 23:21, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek:
Comment Noisy. Would support if the noise will be removed Юрий Д.К. 04:23, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:47, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support MZaplotnik(talk) 17:21, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support per Ikan. – Aristeas (talk) 18:01, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 16:35, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Jan 2026 at 11:34:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#North Macedonia
Info The excavations on the archaeological site conducted in 2001 discovered artefacts from the Neolithic, and the fortress with the settlement around it was identified with the late antique Roman town of Armonia. All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:34, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:34, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Weak support --heylenny (talk/edits) 01:21, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 16:27, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice light and very good quality Юрий Д.К. 04:25, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support MZaplotnik(talk) 22:34, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sharpness and overall quality so-so, November is not the most aesthetic month of the year, lacking wow. —kallerna (talk) 08:47, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
- I disagree. The autumn colours of the vegetation blend very well with the colours of the fortress under the given light conditions, which produces a harmonious and very pleasant composition. I don’t think the composition would improve if the picture was taken during spring. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:52, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Jan 2026 at 08:29:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes/Muscicapidae#Genus_:_Luscinia
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:29, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:29, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:26, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:26, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Ideally, could be sharper, but a small bird, sharp enough for me, and with excellent separation from the background. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:19, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose due to low resolution. The image is heavily cropped as is (from 24 to about 6.6 MP), but due to the high amount of noise I'd say the useful resolution is only about 2 MP. It's a fine picture otherwise. You should definitely nominate File:Bluethroat in Baruipur February 2025 by Tisha Mukherjee 01.jpg, it has more detail and better background separation. AVDLCZ (talk) 21:11, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks, I will nominate that later. I choose this for the plumage over that one. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:34, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:48, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Should be cropped even further. Nice, but not among the best of our bird photos. —kallerna (talk) 08:49, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 15:31, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Jan 2026 at 16:42:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus : Chloephaga
Info I didn't spot the green speculum feathers until my guide told me where to stand. No FPs of this genus. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:42, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:42, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Neutral Technically great and sharp capture of the bird, but the background is quite busy so I'm not sure if it stands up to the really high bar for FP of birds. dllu (talk) 20:28, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
- It is different from usual: a bird on a ridge in a city nature reserve. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:24, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 00:45, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support There is plenty of separation between the bird and the background. FP to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:34, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I am distracted by background. --Mile (talk) 09:28, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:34, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 20:32, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Background is not too distracting. JayCubby (talk) 21:34, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment I find it refreshing because it suggests the invasion of human beings into animal life. --Lmbuga (talk) 23:49, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 16:30, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:50, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 14:34, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Per Lmbuga and very well done. --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 07:30, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Support I like the background. It shows that the bird is near urban parts, though in nature (open field?) Zquid (talk) 17:47, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
- In a small nature reserve. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:37, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Charlesjsharp Interesting! :-) But I see now there is a small problem - this photo, a photo of Upland goose male & female, swan photo and some other seems to have a mixup East / West on camera location. Can you have a look into it? Thank you! And Happy New Year! // Zquid (talk) 10:35, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, A minus sign missing; I'll check all my Laguna Nimez images. Many thanks. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:34, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 11:56, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support per Lmbuga and Zquid. – Aristeas (talk) 17:48, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Jan 2026 at 10:03:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Cisticolidae_(Cisticolas)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 10:03, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 10:03, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:32, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Comment Normally it would be hard to pass with such central shot (as picture above on voting). But for that you need good subject (sharp, pose, colors etc). But than still a crop... --Mile (talk) 09:35, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your suggestion, I intentionally choose not to crop further as I am liking the frame this way as it has a beautiful background and feather details are still good to me. Some people might agree with me. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:08, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Support The composition is restful to me, and while the bird isn't tack sharp, it's still sharp enough, I think, and it's not a very big bird. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:16, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 14:35, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 15:04, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 17:10, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Support per Ikan. – Aristeas (talk) 17:46, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Much tighter crop needed. —kallerna (talk) 08:51, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:21, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 15:32, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Jan 2026 at 22:43:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Germany
Info created, uploaded and nominated by FlocciNivis -- FlocciNivis (talk) 22:43, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- FlocciNivis (talk) 22:43, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:25, 26 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but I miss something extraordinary here for the FP star Poco a poco (talk) 06:42, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support MZaplotnik(talk) 22:31, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Decent image but not special enough for FP in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:02, 30 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per above. --heylenny (talk/edits) 15:04, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per above – Julian Lupyan (talk) 16:58, 1 January 2026 (UTC)
File:Minato City, Tokyo, Japan.jpg, featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jan 2026 at 20:49:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Japan
Info created and uploaded by Davekern – nominated by Davekern -- Davekern (talk) 20:49, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support -- As Photographer Davekern (talk) 20:49, 25 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice light. --Yann (talk) 07:15, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 01:25, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 04:40, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 14:35, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support MZaplotnik(talk) 22:31, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Support--Paracel63 (talk) 20:22, 2 January 2026 (UTC)
Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Mon 29 Dec → Sat 03 Jan Tue 30 Dec → Sun 04 Jan Wed 31 Dec → Mon 05 Jan Thu 01 Jan → Tue 06 Jan Fri 02 Jan → Wed 07 Jan Sat 03 Jan → Thu 08 Jan
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Thu 25 Dec → Sat 03 Jan Fri 26 Dec → Sun 04 Jan Sat 27 Dec → Mon 05 Jan Sun 28 Dec → Tue 06 Jan Mon 29 Dec → Wed 07 Jan Tue 30 Dec → Thu 08 Jan Wed 31 Dec → Fri 09 Jan Thu 01 Jan → Sat 10 Jan Fri 02 Jan → Sun 11 Jan Sat 03 Jan → Mon 12 Jan
Closing nominations manually
The following description explains how to close nominations manually. Normally this is not necessary, as FPCBot takes care of counting the votes, closing and archiving the nominations. When the Bot has counted the votes, a user needs to check and approve the result; everything else is done by the Bot. Therefore, the following instructions are normally only needed for delist-and-replace nominations that the Bot cannot (yet) process, and in case the Bot malfunctions. The closing can be done by any experienced user. If you need help, just ask on the FPC talk page.
Closing a featured picture nomination
- On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the nomination, then [edit].
- Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=(“yes” or “no”)|gallery=xxx|sig=~~~~}}
(You can leave thegalleryparameter blank if the image was not featured. If the nomination contains alternatives, you must add thealternative=xxxparameter with the name of the selected image between thegalleryand thesigparameter. See {{FPC-results-reviewed}} for examples and more explanations.) - Edit the title of the nomination and add
featuredornot featuredafter the link – for example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Add the picture to the appropriate featured picture gallery page and section. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images on Commons:Featured pictures, list to find the gallery page, and search for the correct section. (An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.)
- Add the template
{{Assessments|featured=1}}to the image description page.- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the
com-nomparameter. For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted in the nominationCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use{{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}You also need thecom-nomparameter if the image gets renamed. - If the image is already featured on another Wikipedia, just add
featured=1to the {{Assessments}} template. For instance,{{Assessments|enwiki=1}}becomes{{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the
- Head over to the structured data for the image and add the “Commons quality assessment” claim (P6731) “Wikimedia Commons featured picture” (Q63348049).
- Add the picture to the chronological archives of featured pictures. Place it at the end of the gallery using this format:
File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Title'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|xxx}}, {{o|xxx}}, {{n|xxx}}- The
#should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other entries on that page for examples. (If you want to do everything perfectly, link that number to the nomination subpage, just like FPCBot does this. It allows users to jump directly to the nomination.) - The
Titleshould be replaced by the bare name of the featured picture, without the ‘File:’ or the file extension (such as .jpg .tif .svg). - The
xin{{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}should be replaced by the count of support, oppose, and neutral votes respectively. - If the nomination was a set nomination, use this format:
File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Set: Title (Z files)'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}
Replace theZin(Z files)by the count of images in the set, and use the name of the first image from the set instead ofFile:xxxxx.jpgand for the title.
- The
- Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the nominator. For set nominations, use:== Set Promoted to FP ==, using the names of the set files instead of the XXXXXX and the title of the set instead of YYYYY.
<gallery>
File:XXXXXX.jpg
File:XXXXXX.jpg
</gallery>
{{FPpromotionSet2|YYYYY}} - Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedUploader|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the user who has uploaded the image, if that user is not the same as the nominator. - Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedCreator|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the creator, if the author is a different Commons user than nominator and uploader.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}-d, {{FPD}}-d and {{Withdraw}}-n nominations), you have to move the transclusion (the {{ }} and the text within those) of the nomination to the current log page.
- To find the current log page, visit the first page of the log for this month. If the header of that page contains a link with the text “Next part of this month”, the log for this month has been split into several parts because it contains too many entries. Click on the “Next part …” link and repeat this until you reach a page where the header does not offer a “Next part …” link; that’s the last and current log page.
- Now open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you are closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}or:{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/XXXXX}}. - Copy that line to the bottom of the current log page and save that page. Then remove the same line from the candidate list and save that page.
Closing a delisting nomination
- On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):{{FPC-delist-results-reviewed|delist=x|keep=x|neutral=x|delisted=yes/no|sig=~~~~}}
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Ensifera ensifera (22271195865).jpg) - Edit the title of the delisting nomination and add
delistedornot delistedafter the image title; for example:=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change
featured=1tofeatured=2(do not remove the {{Assessments}} template; do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes). If the image description page uses the old {{Featured picture}} template, replace it with{{Assessments|featured=2}}. - Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris); but not from categories about featured pictures on specific Wikipedia editions, like Category:Featured pictures on Wikipedia, English.
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" (Q63348049) from the picture's Structured data.
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in the chronological archive of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1–6) with (1–6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture must not be removed from the chronological archives.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the section above. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Archiving a withdrawn nomination
If a nomination has been withdrawn by the nominator by using {{Withdraw}} or is cancelled with {{FPX}} or {{FPD}}, wait 24 hours after the nomination was last edited. If there has been no objection to the cancellation within this time, the nomination can simply be archived. Just move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
