Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates
📽️ Media
|
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Adding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
| |||||||||||||||||||
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2025 at 07:41:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Tunisia
Info created by Skander zarrad – uploaded by Skander zarrad – nominated by Hommi2020 -- Hommi2020 (talk) 07:41, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Hommi2020 (talk) 07:41, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2025 at 06:32:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures_outdoors
Info Horas de Chumbo is a hidden gem in Lisbon. It's a great mix of art, acoustics and urban flair. The tunnel is an interesting photo opportunity and the echo experience is amazing. Created by Julesvernex2 – uploaded by Julesvernex2 – nominated by Syntaxys -- Syntaxys (talk) 06:32, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support I particularly like the abstraction in this image composition; you don't immediately realise what you're looking at here. -- Syntaxys (talk) 06:32, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2025 at 23:51:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Baden-Württemberg
Info I think the muted colours are part of the charm here. Very elegant and painterly photograph for me. created by Aristeas – uploaded by Aristeas – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 23:51, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 23:51, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Nothing special to me, sorry. Perfectly fine as a QI, but no great composition and not painterly to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:59, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- No worries, I fully understand this. Not trying to change your vote, but I'll explain in some more detail why this picture is special to me, for the benefit of other voters. I like the gentle curve of the path from the bottom left that subtly leads the eye towards the horizon. I like the shapes of some of the trees, including the one slightly to the right of middle that looks a bit like a trident. But most of all I like the colours. The contrast between the winter mood of the bare trees and grey frost, and the green grass and rich clods of earth poking their way out from the frost. It feels to me like, even though it's still winter, the world is promising to start coming back to life. I really like that. Cmao20 (talk) 05:51, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:57, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support A very beautiful portrait of a typical landscape scene in Kraichgau. It invites you to leave the warm living room and take a walk in the fresh air. --Syntaxys (talk) 06:03, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2025 at 23:51:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Switzerland
Info Nice cold mood in a Swiss town square at blue hour. created by Roy Egloff – uploaded by Roy Egloff – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 23:51, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 23:51, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 04:57, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2025 at 21:18:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info created and uploaded by Royal Society uploader, nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 21:18, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:46, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Good portrait. I was thinking "Dyson vacuum cleaners" and I was like "No, couldn't be." But in fact, this is Sir Dyson Vacuum Cleaners! He literally invented bagless vacuum cleaning! Among other things he's done. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:02, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2025 at 15:29:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Ships
Info created and uploaded by Julian Herzog, nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 15:29, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:20, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support The subtle quality of light elevates the image beyond mere documentation. -- Radomianin (talk) 23:12, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:46, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Radomianin, you so often cut to the heart of what makes a photo great. I agree 100%. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:04, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you very much, Ikan. I just try to express honestly what I feel in the images. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:03, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 05:05, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2025 at 15:11:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Windows
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:09, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:09, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:46, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support This is an operating school? Seeing the thumbnail on FPC, I didn't think I'd like this photo, but it is a very good composition and also has pathos. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:06, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 05:06, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Despite modest light, I like the colour palette and the broken plaster revealing the masonry - it gives the facade a raw, honest character. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:15, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2025 at 14:54:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Tyrol
Info The Grawa-Waterfall in the Stubai Valley, Tyrol, Austria. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 14:54, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 14:54, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:43, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:44, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Impressive view - convincingly captured. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:08, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:46, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 05:06, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful angle of view, and along the lines of Radomianin, I'd say you really captured the dynamism of the water. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:20, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2025 at 14:07:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Family : Oxyopidae (Lynx Spider)
Info created by Cvmontuy – uploaded by Cvmontuy – nominated by Cvmontuy -- Cvmontuy (talk) 14:07, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cvmontuy (talk) 14:07, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:46, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 03:13, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 05:06, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Question Are you sure about the species? w:Peucetia viridana says it's "a species of spider found in India, Myanmar and Sri Lanka," and the picture in the article looks different from this one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:23, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- I asked Google AI with a screenshot and was told that this is indeed the species ''Peucetia viridans'', along with the information that it also exists in Mexico. Syntaxys (talk) 06:49, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support OK for me, I confirm that it is indeed Peucetia viridana.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:54, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Although the depth of field is not perfect, I think the image is very well done, as it shows the species in its natural environment and the important details are clearly visible. I would find information about the size of the spider interesting. --Syntaxys (talk) 06:56, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2025 at 11:57:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Genus : Vultur
Info The world's largest bird of prey is a beautiful vulture. The wingspan of some albatross species can be about 10% greater. All by Charlesjsdharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:57, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:57, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:46, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 03:15, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 05:06, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Yes, a striking bird. Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:27, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2025 at 10:33:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Morocco
Info Sunset in the Daya Chiker valley in Taza province, Morocco. Autumn foliage of Black poplar (Populus nigra) glows as light of the setting sun floods the valley. Sheep are following their shepherd home. Daya Chiker is a polje caused by leaching of the limestone strata. Created by Tagooty – uploaded by Tagooty – nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 10:33, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 10:33, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Wonderful light, high resolution and very idyllic with those sheeps and the shepherd. --Milseburg (talk) 14:58, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per Milseburg.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:39, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:47, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:47, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 05:06, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2025 at 02:52:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
Info created by Cacio Murilo via MTur Destinos – uploaded by Sintegrity – nominated by Heylenny -- heylenny (talk/edits) 02:52, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- heylenny (talk/edits) 02:52, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Sintegrity (talk) 15:00, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment Very interesting, but random-looking crop on the right side. File:Pedra do Ingá - Paraíba - Brasil - panoramio.jpg, although showing less of the rock face and in a different color, has a better composition to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:37, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2025 at 02:42:20 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Brazil
Info created by Renato Soares via MTur Destinos – first uploaded by Sintegrity, edited and nominated by me -- heylenny (talk/edits) 02:42, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- heylenny (talk/edits) 02:42, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support —brainandforce [yap] 22:43, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:47, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment I feel like I'd like to see the top of the nearest crane. Nice light, clouds, etc. I'm undecided for now. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:39, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:42, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2025 at 22:48:13 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Space_exploration#Telescopes
Info An amateur 8 inch (20 cm) Ritchey–Chrétien telescope imaging under dark skies at Kickapoo Valley Reserve, WI, USA. Created, uploaded, and nominated by brainandforce -- Brainandforce (talk) 22:48, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support We don't have any featured pictures of amateur telescopes in this category. -- Brainandforce (talk) 22:48, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. heylenny (talk/edits) 00:17, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Difficult to take and fine in the preview. Bit in full resolution the technical quality is not good enough for FP, I think. --Milseburg (talk) 15:01, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- Fair, I hadn't seen too many examples of nighttime photography here so I wasn't sure if this would meet FP standards. I'll leave it up for more opinions, and if anyone else wants to have a go at processing the RAW I'm happy to share it. —brainandforce [yap] 22:37, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Very nice idea, however, simply too grainy for what it is, in my opinion Cmao20 (talk) 23:48, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2025 at 22:11:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Italy
Info Designed in 1884 by architect Enrico Azzati, this luxurious hotel was conceived for Leghorn's seaside tourism and hosted illustrious figures such as King Umberto I, Queen Margherita of Savoy and Guglielmo Marconi. The roof of the building, subject to countless modifications over the decades, was substantially redone during the last restoration; this made it possible to enhance the small towers that characterise the top of the hotel, where tradition has it that Guglielmo Marconi carried out some experiments on Telegraphy. All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:11, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:11, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. heylenny (talk/edits) 00:07, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support In some ways, being able to see a reflection of the entire hotel might be more satisfying, but this is quite good and a solid FP to me, especially with the documentation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:32, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Brainandforce (talk) 02:06, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 14:48, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:01, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Milseburg (talk) 15:02, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:04, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 16:44, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:38, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:46, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2025 at 21:59:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Austria
Info created, uploaded and nominated by FlocciNivis -- FlocciNivis (talk) 21:59, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- FlocciNivis (talk) 21:59, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose That's a really nice fanciful castle of a building, but I don't like it being in shadow while the rest of the picture is so bright. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:35, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose As Ikan Kekek said, the rest of the image is too bright. It's probably fixable though. TheBritinator (talk) 10:37, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support FP to me already but would definitely do with being processed a bit better so that the colours didn't seem so washed-out Cmao20 (talk) 23:45, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2025 at 11:00:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Cervidae (Deer)
Info This is the second smallest deer in the world; about 40cm/16in at the shoulder. IUCN Red List Near Threatened; it is nocturnal. I couldn't get a decent shot of the whole deer, not least because they are hidden by the grass! This is a high ISO focus-stack under torch light. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 11.00, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:10, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. There are some artifacts of the bracketing and high NR, but good job! I've tagged a couple of things. JayCubby (talk) 00:42, 9 November 2025 (UTC)- You figure File:Southern pudu (Pudu puda) male Chiloe.jpg is not good? Is it missing a tail? What's problematic about both pictures is the need to use so much flash (and might that have endangered the animals?). I'll
Support this one, but I think the other one is also worth considering. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:40, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose The use of flash is too obvious, sorry. TheBritinator (talk) 10:38, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination But please TheBritinator and Ikan Kekek don't suggest I used flash. These images were taken, as I stated, under torch light. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:39, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, you mentioned that above, but I forgot because it looked like flash to me. Note that I support the nomination. Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:52, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks. I hadn't noticed your suppport. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:52, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2025 at 10:52:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Asparagaceae
Info created, uploaded and nominated by FlocciNivis -- FlocciNivis (talk) 10:52, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- FlocciNivis (talk) 10:52, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice pattern. --Harlock81 (talk) 15:31, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 19:10, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Impressive – in German I would call this ein grafisches Bild. There are a few dust spots in the sky, I would suggest to remove them (see image notes). – Aristeas (talk) 19:22, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- Dankeschön! I removed the dust spots now -- FlocciNivis (talk) 21:56, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:08, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per Aristeas. -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:42, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Good idea. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:41, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Very satisfying, and I like the gray sky. Brainandforce (talk) 02:12, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 10:40, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:03, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:44, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:34, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2025 at 09:21:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Uzbekistan
Info Islam Hoja Minaret outside Itchan-Kala wall, Khiva, Uzbekistan (Минарет Ислам Ходжа, Хива, Islomxoʻja minorasi). My shot. -- Mile (talk) 09:21, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 09:21, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Можда би боје биле природније без поларизатора, али није лоше ни овако како јесте. Сећам се да је пењање на врх тог минарета било прилично скупо (100.000 сома). --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:13, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment Толку само ако купиш карта за сите музеји внатре, а ги има за 3 дена гледање, внатре во зидини. Јас горе и не бев. Со скап ЦПЛ, овај од Marumi MC-CPL, стотка беше, има веома добри резултати. Некни имав ефтин Heliopan, ама не беше ок. А иначе влез во зидини е беспалетн. Значи купвај скапо, да не купваш двапати. И поголем радјиус земиш, да можи и НД филтер да приклајш горе и да не објектив не покрива слика. --Mile (talk) 16:52, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment A very beautiful minaret and an effective composition, but IMHO too dark, especially the sky. That a CPL is a “natural” = non-digital filter does not mean that we must take its effect as natural if it is exaggerated; this photo would look much more natural if you lift the exposure on the sky during the post-processing/raw image development. – Aristeas (talk) 15:19, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment @Aristeas i will use copy-paste, for more check Polarizing filter (photography): “...This allows the natural color and detail of what is beneath to come through. Reflections from a window into a dark interior can be much reduced, allowing it to be seen through. (The same effects are available for vision by using polarizing sunglasses.)”... DeepSeek say: “In conclusion, a C-PL filter gives you direct optical control over light and reflections, allowing you to capture scenes in a way that often more closely matches how your eye perceives them, or to creatively enhance them beyond reality. It's a must-have for landscape, architecture, and travel photographers.”Reddit say:“Is a CPL filter worth it? Circular Polarizer (CPL) filters are a must-have tool for photographers looking to reduce glare, enhance colors, and improve overall image quality. Whether you're shooting landscapes, reflections on water, or through glass, a CPL filter can make a significant difference.” I say: yes, i need it, otherwise i would left it at home. Otherwsie compare colors on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Minaret_of_Islam_Khodja_Madrasa And its still about Minaret and not sky. I increase there than i increase Minaret too. I would not change anything. --Mile (talk) 16:39, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for the explanations, although this was not necessary – I know well about the use of polarizing filters, there are always CPLs for my most-used lenses in my bag and I use them from time to time. And I did not say that you should leave the CPL at home. My point was that while the minarets look clearer thanks to the reduced reflections, the sky gets too dark. There are two ways to cope with this. (1) CPL filters have the advantage that you can vary the strength of the polarization by just turning the filter a little but. Personally I often use CPL filters at a medium setting, so I get clearer colours and a darker sky, but not a too dark one. But if you need to use the CPL at its maximum setting because this is necessary for the proper rendering of the minaret, you can still (2) use a simple mask on the sky to increase its exposure during the post processing/raw image development. This allows you to lift the exposure of the sky until it looks natural without changing the look of the minaret, and this is what I wanted to suggest here. – Aristeas (talk) 18:57, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:46, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose -- There is no such DARK SKY at this time of day. Je-str (talk) 21:19, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose. No 'wow' here. heylenny (talk/edits) 00:05, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment The sky is really dark, but the minaret is really beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:44, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Request To me, the focus here seems to be more on the clay wall than on the minaret - therefore I personally would not support this version. However, you have variants from the same series in your upload list. This one appears considerably more suitable (sharper, better exposure). I would very gladly support this alternative if you would like to add it here. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 10:44, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose The sky is way too dark, sorry. TheBritinator (talk) 12:42, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment Comment of Je-str "There is no such DARK SKY at this time of day.". Well yes it is, you can see it. And some anmials can see this kind too. Just human sight is a bit "rock bottom". But if i would use this filter on water or window, to see thru and skip one part of reflextion, than would be all fine. Well in this you can also say "there is no such view". @Ikan Kekek, Radomianin, i will left as it is. --Mile (talk) 18:21, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support I am not really keen on the darkness of the sky either but I still think it deserves a star Cmao20 (talk) 23:52, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:41, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2025 at 08:43:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus_:_Ardea
Info A grey heron (Ardea cinerea) near some heron statues, c/u/n by Alexis Lours -- Alexis Lours (talk) 08:43, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Alexis Lours (talk) 08:43, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support 1st option was better, more clear colors-contrast. --Mile (talk) 09:44, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks, reverted it. Alexis Lours (talk) 23:47, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support That's hilarious, a real heron among the sculptures. I feel like a really small crop on the left to eliminate the little bit of the lotus flower would be neater, but that's up to you. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:46, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- Done! Thanks, didn't notice it. Alexis Lours (talk) 15:24, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support I would consider Ikan's cropping suggestion but it's a call. In favor of this one, the lily serves as a white counterpoint drawing the live heron and the viewer to that side of the frame. --GRDN711 (talk) 04:50, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- To be clear: I like the whole lily flower and suggest cropping out only the little bit of another lily flower to its left. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:05, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. heylenny (talk/edits) 05:30, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 14:47, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:01, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Funny and creative composition :) -- Radomianin (talk) 17:05, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support I enjoyed this one. —brainandforce [yap] 22:40, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:44, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2025 at 08:47:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Species_:_Vulpes_vulpes_(Red_Foxes)
Info A red fox (Vulpes vulpes) drinking from a lake. c/n by Alexis Lours -- Alexis Lours (talk) 08:47, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Alexis Lours (talk) 08:47, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:35, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 16:06, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 16:16, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:47, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Very nice. – It would be useful to rename the file (but only as soon as this nomination has been closed!) to make the filename a bit more descriptive – “Flickr” can go, but “drinking” should be added. – Aristeas (talk) 19:16, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- Yeah, sadly got uploaded by the Flickr bot before I got the time to do it myself. Will make a rename request once the period is over. Alexis Lours (talk) 23:45, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:44, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. heylenny (talk/edits) 00:05, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Awesome shot! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:48, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 04:56, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:47, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Great picture. TheBritinator (talk) 12:43, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:00, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:35, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:44, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Great picture, probably taken just before the escape? :) --Syntaxys (talk) 07:15, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2025 at 06:29:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family_:_Crocodylidae_(Crocodiles)
Info All by Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:29, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:29, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose. Dramatic and rare moment, but low quality photo. Backfocus, lost detail, posterized crocodile and horns :(. -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:43, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support That's enough focus, considering the moment it captures. As stated at the top of the page: "A bad picture of a very difficult subject is better than a good picture of an ordinary subject." And this is absolutely not a bad picture: the crocodile is just a bit grainy. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:51, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. heylenny (talk/edits) 05:38, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:59, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per Ikan. --Yann (talk) 15:09, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support I don't think the quality is really low. It's just a bit noisy, but I always prefer noise to too much noise reduction Cmao20 (talk) 23:44, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2025 at 01:49:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Galaxies
Info created, uploaded, and nominated by Tk833 -- Tk833 (talk) 01:49, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tk833 (talk) 01:49, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment Fantastic details! But why is it cropped on 4 sides? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:09, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- The image is cropped to a field of view of 212°. This is the maximum that can be reached from my observation position in Germany. Tk833 (talk) 09:05, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- You're not able to view a whole circle? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:12, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- In the center of the sides (assuming you have this in mind, and not the black areas), a few square degrees of data that lie outside the region of interest are not shown. This region of interest (from the astronomical survey from which the data is derived) covers the northern sky down to a declination of -16°. Thus, the image is cropped to exactly 212° in both horizontal and vertical directions through the north celestial pole. There is an additional border of approximately 1.5° for which data has been calculated as well (though the quality is significantly reduced). This data is also shown in the images. If the view had been cropped strictly to the region of interest, the shown region would appear as a perfect circle without crops at the sides. Tk833 (talk) 12:38, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- A perfect circle would look much better. That's exactly what I'm getting at. Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:48, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- In the center of the sides (assuming you have this in mind, and not the black areas), a few square degrees of data that lie outside the region of interest are not shown. This region of interest (from the astronomical survey from which the data is derived) covers the northern sky down to a declination of -16°. Thus, the image is cropped to exactly 212° in both horizontal and vertical directions through the north celestial pole. There is an additional border of approximately 1.5° for which data has been calculated as well (though the quality is significantly reduced). This data is also shown in the images. If the view had been cropped strictly to the region of interest, the shown region would appear as a perfect circle without crops at the sides. Tk833 (talk) 12:38, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- You're not able to view a whole circle? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:12, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- The image is cropped to a field of view of 212°. This is the maximum that can be reached from my observation position in Germany. Tk833 (talk) 09:05, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 08:55, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment Maybe it is a well known effect and my question is trivial, but there are two bright circles that intersect perpendicularly the Milky Way. What are they? --Harlock81 (talk) 15:43, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- Description says: The circular double band is the ecliptic.
- It would be great to have some annotations: main stars and objects (Andromeda Galaxy?), and some information about the equipment. Thanks, Yann (talk) 16:24, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- I'll be working on an astronomical image template (Template:Astrophoto information?) so that this can be provided succinctly in the future. Brainandforce (talk) 21:06, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks!
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:35, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks!
Support -- Brainandforce (talk) 21:06, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support This is a unique image. Defnitely favor more annotation and image description for future use. --GRDN711 (talk) 05:10, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 12:03, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Info @Yann, @GRDN711: I tried to put a few of the most interesting pieces of information into the description. For extensive documentation of the technical details (such as the custom-made instruments), you have to follow the reference in the description. The same applies to the visualization of the entire data set (including annotations from many catalogs), because even the 81 MP version here is just a thumbnail. Commons is not made for the presentation of such projects. Nevertheless, I extended the description with references to other color composites of the same view on Commons and annotated a few large structures. (Annotations only work in the preview image. Objects like M31 or the Pleiades are tiny in that view.) -- Tk833
Support --Llez (talk) 14:45, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:53, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2025 at 22:10:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Scorpaenidae_(Scorpionfish)
Info Spotfin lionfish (Pterois antennata), Ad Dimaniyat Islands, Oman. Pterois antennata has a wide Indo-West Pacific distribution, from the Gulf of Aden south to South Africa east to French Polynesia, north as far as southern Japan, and south to Australia and the Kermadec Islands of New Zealand. The species, which attains a maximum total length of 20 centimetres (7.9 in), has the specific name antennata, which means "with antennae", as allusion to the supraorbital tentacles. It's a nocturnal hunter, most active just after nightfall, and spends the day hiding in crevices and caves facing inwards with its venomous spines pointing backwards. It preys mainly on crustaceans and small fishes, including juveniles of its own species, which are approached slowly using undulating fins. They are normally solitary and protect a home range from other broad-barred lionfishes and other lionfish species. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 22:10, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 22:10, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support TheBritinator (talk) 23:58, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment It seems like there are a lot of blue halos present.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:41, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- I removed them as far as possible Famberhorst, Poco a poco (talk) 09:47, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 08:24, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment @Poco a poco Its same problem like previous. But now i am more afraid i would see "brush tool" all around and leave as it is. Otherwise if you really want a FP for picture, you should spent some more time with edit. --Mile (talk) 09:56, 8 November 2025 (UTC) p.S. I use 20 s to remove much more CA than here.
- Mile: Famberhost's feedback was fine and fair. There was room for improvement, and I uploaded an improved version. It isn't still perfect but affirming that it's an issue now for FP falls in my opinion in the category pixelpeeping. I'd like to hear more opinions. That precisely you come with this kind of comments when some of your FP noms at full resolution (like tis one) are just of poor detail is kind of weird (your last noms have been likely downsampled to "improve" them, something I don't do). --Poco a poco (talk) 12:58, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support FP to me, interesting and quality is good enough considering challenges of underwater photography Cmao20 (talk) 23:42, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2025 at 07:38:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Tunisia
Info The three temples of Sbeitla, Tunisia, are the Capitoline temples dedicated to Jupiter, Juno, and Minerva. Here they appear through the triumphal arch of Antoninus and Marcus Aurelius.
all by me -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 07:38, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Question Do you have any pictures in which the top part of the temple on the left is fully visible and not at all cut off, with this same kind of view through the arch? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:38, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- Hello ok I will see what I can do. I have to search in my files IssamBarhoumi (talk) 05:45, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks. It's a very good compositional idea. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:21, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- Hello again
- I did not find another photo like this but i asked my self how it come that the inside is stright and the gate seems a bit tilted
- So i took a look to the site from above
- 35.240031,9.119523
- Those are the coordinate from maps and you can verify that the main entrance of the gate face the in between the tow right temples and do not face the central one.
- You can verify also in this article there is a plan of the forum the gate and the three temple:
- https://www.photosetbalades.fr/galerie-d-hier/afrique-du-nord/proconsulaire-sbeitla/ IssamBarhoumi (talk) 12:44, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- I don't mind the gate being tilted; I just want none of the 3 temples to be cropped. Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:59, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- Really I do not have other photos ... You have to advance more and we lose the framing. IssamBarhoumi (talk) 21:14, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- I don't mind the gate being tilted; I just want none of the 3 temples to be cropped. Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:59, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- Hello ok I will see what I can do. I have to search in my files IssamBarhoumi (talk) 05:45, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment I still see FP option with some crop+edit. Try Alternative. --Mile (talk) 10:20, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- hello Mile
- I tried to crop an edit but things become a bit weired I have to sacrify lot from the
- gate
- ... but i asked my self how it comes that the inside is stright and the gate seems a bit tilted
- So i took a look to the site from above
- 35.240031,9.119523
- Those are the coordinate from maps and you can verify that the main entrance of the gate face the in between the tow right temples and do not face the central one.
- You can verify also in this article there is a plan of the forum the gate and the three temple:
- https://www.photosetbalades.fr/galerie-d-hier/afrique-du-nord/proconsulaire-sbeitla/ IssamBarhoumi (talk) 12:50, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. heylenny (talk/edits) 00:04, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:51, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment Just to check, the sky is natural here? The transition between the arches and the sky seems a bit abrupt (strong contrast/sharp edges). If the sky hasn't been replaced, then yeah I'll support Cmao20 (talk) 23:42, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- Replaced No but just sharpening and saturation. IssamBarhoumi (talk) 06:32, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2025 at 23:08:33 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications/Germany#Thuringia
Info Heldburg Castle in the district of Hildburghausen, aerial view. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 23:08, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ermell (talk) 23:08, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Info Why is it in Bavaria? And not Thuringia? -- -donald- (talk) 06:24, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- My mistake. Thanks for the hint. Ermell (talk) 08:41, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Really high-quality drone photo, irrespective of questions of categorization. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:32, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- -donald- (talk) 13:18, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:39, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Representative, strong visual impact, good composition and solid technical quality. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:58, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice, a shot in autumn would have looked even better. Poco a poco (talk) 22:18, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support TheBritinator (talk) 23:57, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 02:43, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:09, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Milseburg (talk) 12:51, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 16:07, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:47, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:09, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:46, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. heylenny (talk/edits) 00:03, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 14:44, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:34, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:40, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2025 at 22:48:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Genus : Puma (Puma and cougar)
Info No puma/cougar FPs. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:48, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:48, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 22:58, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Well camouflaged, but we can still see her fine. Kudos to you for spotting and taking such a clear photo of her! How far away were you? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:34, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- We tracked the pumas on foot after our spotter had found a female (they don't track the males). This one came to less than 10m before starting her unsucessful hunt. On a previous evening (that's when pumas are active) we approached this different female. She walked away, but the guide and I ran around the back of a small hill. She reappeared few minutes later, turned and approached us (the guides don't carry guns) and walked past within 2m without looking up. Exciting. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:58, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- Also potentially very dangerous! Be careful! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:35, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- We tracked the pumas on foot after our spotter had found a female (they don't track the males). This one came to less than 10m before starting her unsucessful hunt. On a previous evening (that's when pumas are active) we approached this different female. She walked away, but the guide and I ran around the back of a small hill. She reappeared few minutes later, turned and approached us (the guides don't carry guns) and walked past within 2m without looking up. Exciting. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:58, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:30, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support JayCubby (talk) 13:41, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:37, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support A hidden marvel of nature, revealed like the Cheshire Cat - first a nose, then the eyes, finally the full figure :) -- Radomianin (talk) 19:20, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 22:19, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 23:19, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support TheBritinator (talk) 23:58, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 05:08, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:38, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support My first reaction was that there isn't enough separation between the subject and the background, but then I thought for a few more seconds and realized that is the whole point. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:24, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Per KoH, the lack of separation between subject and background is a central point of the picture, these animals are supposed to be hard to spot. Acroterion (talk) 13:12, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:44, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:48, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin and KoH. – Aristeas (talk) 19:08, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:47, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support The shallow depth of field and sharp focus almost made me think the puma was edited in. Brainandforce (talk) 22:51, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. heylenny (talk/edits) 00:02, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 10:38, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 12:43, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 14:43, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Huge wow factor here Cmao20 (talk) 23:40, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2025 at 17:18:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#North Macedonia
Info More information about the building can be found here. All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:18, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:18, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support I like the seemingly uniform facade that, on closer inspection, reveals a surprising visual richness. It becomes a very graphic play of small deviations. It faintly evokes a distant echo of Rear Window - not narratively, but in the abstract idea of a grid of workspaces and surfaces activated by human presence. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:17, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin's cogent statement. It's fun to move my eyes around. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:36, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:36, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support This image kind of reminds me of LedZep Physical Graffiti album cover :) -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 02:49, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 05:08, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:45, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:48, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin. And it seems to be really real, unlike a certain infamous similar ex-FP ;–). – Aristeas (talk) 19:06, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --XRay 💬 19:11, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin. -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:48, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support heylenny (talk/edits) 23:07, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support —brainandforce [yap] 08:59, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 14:42, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Красный wanna talk? 17:51, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:39, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2025 at 17:03:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Passeridae (Old world sparrows)
Info Note, please: there are a lot of male sparrows in this category, but I decided to load this one because of its abundant and fluffy plumage, which offered a tactile contrast, easy to adjust and focus thanks to the crisp and wonderful spring sunlight near Lake Geneva. All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 17:03, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 17:03, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support The detail is superb, the focus is precise, and the image remains natural - no trace of over-sharpening. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:21, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin. That's quite a closeup! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:38, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:34, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 23:19, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 02:50, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 05:09, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:46, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per Radomianin. Perfect photo. --LexKurochkin (talk) 16:09, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:49, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:03, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. heylenny (talk/edits) 00:02, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 14:42, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:33, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:39, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2025 at 17:01:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Religion#Others; 'Others' can be replaced with 'Sikhism' if featured
Info created by an unknown painter for Sodhi Bhan Singh – uploaded by The Most Comfortable Chair – nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 17:01, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 17:01, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment Very detailed, but are the crops arbitrary? Also, if you want a different featured pictures category, you need to fix it now. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:41, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- I think you mean "featured pictures gallery", and UnpetitproleX is not doing anything wrong here. The 'Sikhism' section doesn't exist yet, but will be created if this is featured. He's very kindly letting us know what religion this image belongs to, making the job easier for us gallery maintainers. ;-) --Cart (talk) 11:44, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, the Sikhism gallery doesn’t yet exist, but would if this is featured. Also, as an aside, @W.carter: I do not prefer gendered pronouns on wikiprojects—it is not a big deal, but if you may use gender neutral ones that would be preferred. I do have a disclaimer on my enwiki talk page regarding this, I will add it here as well. Regardless of that, I do think it is my job to let people know of this preference and not something I expect them to just know, of course. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:28, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, I didn't know about your pronouns. I use "he" for any user I don't know the gender of here on the Wiki-projects. Statistically for users here, it most often true, so nothing personal. I'm called "he" so often, I usually don't react to it. I only get feisty when someone calls me derogatory names because they know I'm a woman. --Cart (talk) 12:35, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, the Sikhism gallery doesn’t yet exist, but would if this is featured. Also, as an aside, @W.carter: I do not prefer gendered pronouns on wikiprojects—it is not a big deal, but if you may use gender neutral ones that would be preferred. I do have a disclaimer on my enwiki talk page regarding this, I will add it here as well. Regardless of that, I do think it is my job to let people know of this preference and not something I expect them to just know, of course. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:28, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: The painting is not perfectly square and the borders are not perfectly straight, so some of the margins of the border have been cropped out, unfortunately. This is the crop that exists at the source. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:34, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- I know it's the same at the source. I don't like the crops and don't think we should feature an incomplete image of this work, so I'm tempted to oppose although it's very impressive. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:32, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- I think you mean "featured pictures gallery", and UnpetitproleX is not doing anything wrong here. The 'Sikhism' section doesn't exist yet, but will be created if this is featured. He's very kindly letting us know what religion this image belongs to, making the job easier for us gallery maintainers. ;-) --Cart (talk) 11:44, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice artwork, good reproduction. --Yann (talk) 23:22, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Excellent reproduction. Agree with Ikan that the cropped borders are a bit unfortunate, hence the “weak”. – Aristeas (talk) 19:03, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support MZaplotnik(talk) 08:28, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 14:42, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Wow, huge file + fascinating details to explore Cmao20 (talk) 23:39, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2025 at 15:14:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Tunisia
Info created by Majbri wael – uploaded by Majbri wael – nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 15:14, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 15:14, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support @Mounir TOUZRI Light is perfect here. But i think some minor rotation to counterclockwise.--Mile (talk) 17:19, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 23:23, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. heylenny (talk/edits) 00:01, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment This photo is very good, but I don't like the crop of the top of the building that was not in the first version. @Mounir TOUZRI, is there any way to keep it in the picture while maintaining the requested minor rotation? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:57, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Majbri wael I talked with the photographer and he will answer this request, thank you for your comment Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 11:02, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:38, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:40, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2025 at 15:10:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Thailand
Info created by Don – uploaded by Don| – nominated by WPPilot -- Don (talk) 15:10, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Don (talk) 15:10, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment Gallery fixed, a temple is a religious building. The categories and description also needs to be improved, you know enough to place it in the right WP article, so that shouldn't be any problem for you. --Cart (talk) 11:51, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- Info and categories added per request by the photo's author. Please have a look at what I did and use it as a "cheat sheet" the next time you make a nomination. --Cart (talk) 16:49, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. heylenny (talk/edits) 00:01, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support MZaplotnik(talk) 08:27, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry but although this is a nice dramatic view, the colour noise and artefacts at full size mean I can't support for FP Cmao20 (talk) 23:38, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2025 at 14:25:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phasianidae_(Grouse,_Partridges,_Peafowl,_Pheasants,_Quail,_Turkeys)
Info created by, uploaded by, and nominated by Polinova -- Polinova (talk) 14:25, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Polinova (talk) 14:25, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Request Unfortunately, the image seems slightly out of focus, or a bit blurred, which is quite a pity. Do you have another photo from the series that you could offer as an alternative? -- Radomianin (talk) 21:43, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
- Unfortunately the rest in the series are either similar or the tail is partially behind a branch. There are not very many good photos of Gambel's Quail available on Wikimedia Category:Callipepla gambelii. I believe this may be the only full unobscured profile in good light and decent focus and resolution. I hope this gives it a fairly good "wow factor" that mitigates the slight lack of focus. Polinova (talk) 02:22, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your explanation and for putting things into context - I appreciate your openness and the conversation. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 06:08, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Pretty bird, insufficient image quality for FP, as per Radomianin's remarks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:41, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. heylenny (talk/edits) 00:01, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Great composition, but image quality is borderline at this size Cmao20 (talk) 23:37, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2025 at 13:17:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/United_States#New_Jersey
Info created by Szeremeta – uploaded by Szeremeta – nominated by Szeremeta -- Szeremeta (talk) 13:17, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Szeremeta (talk) 13:17, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Big, detailed picture of Sandy Hook. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:45, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Ikan. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:25, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 23:24, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:54, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:36, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2025 at 13:03:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#United_States
Info created by Szeremeta – uploaded by Szeremeta – nominated by Szeremeta -- Szeremeta (talk) 13:03, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Szeremeta (talk) 13:03, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:41, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Very detailed and valuable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:47, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:31, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:37, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Nice but the ccw tilt needs to be fixed. Will support when done Poco a poco (talk) 22:15, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support TheBritinator (talk) 23:56, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:31, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:50, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. heylenny (talk/edits) 00:02, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:25, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:36, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2025 at 12:54:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Greece
Info For the first time since decades, the Parthenon of the Acropolis of Athens was free of scaffoldings during only a short period of time. Click here to see what people have been seeing for 20 years. Luckily I was there at the right time and captured this photo at nightfall. Created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:54, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:54, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support – Excellent lighting and composition. – Szeremeta (talk) 13:06, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 13:57, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 17:04, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:11, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment Good shot, any option to crop as noted ? Trees, bottom are not sharp and uniteresting, also some sky. --Mile (talk) 17:16, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:43, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful. IMHO cropping the image would damage the composition. – Aristeas (talk) 20:16, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Per Aristeas.--Ermell (talk) 20:38, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support The composition works as it is - I agree with Aristeas that cropping would weaken its spatial impact. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:25, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:21, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 07:28, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support I think I favor keeping the photo as is, too, although I agree that the blurred trees are not very interesting in themselves (I think the sky is, though, and they balance it). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:51, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support This is definitely the best spot to observe the Acropolis, and the choice to go there at blue hour was great.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:49, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:29, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Nice but there is something wrong with the rightmost frame, Poco a poco (talk) 22:10, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support A shame about the right per Poco a poco, but I'll still support given the rarity of this scene. I think you should get your lens checked out for decentering, since it obviously isn't a focusing issue when the left side (at the same distance) is perfectly fine. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:22, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. heylenny (talk/edits) 00:00, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 05:01, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:58, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:36, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2025 at 12:10:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1860-1869
Info created by John Burke – restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:10, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:10, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 17:04, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:44, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:21, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Great photo, very well restored. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:53, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:27, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Llez (talk) 16:02, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:13, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per Ikan. – Aristeas (talk) 11:12, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per Ikan --LexKurochkin (talk) 16:16, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. heylenny (talk/edits) 23:42, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 10:30, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2025 at 07:01:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Tunisia
Info created by Skander zarrad – uploaded by Skander zarrad – nominated by Ovva olfa -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 07:01, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 07:01, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment I would crop some above. --Mile (talk) 09:25, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
- I don't disagree with you, but it's so minor and in a way I think adds to the composition, so i'll
Support – Szeremeta (talk) 13:08, 6 November 2025 (UTC) - I agree, and I'm also a bit disappointed that most of the top portion is in shadow. Great motif, but maybe should be photographed at a different time for optimal results? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:55, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per Mile and my remarks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:59, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support But agree with crop. Also, there are lots of dust spots at the top. heylenny (talk/edits) 23:30, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- I don't disagree with you, but it's so minor and in a way I think adds to the composition, so i'll
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:55, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:31, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2025 at 05:47:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Hydnangiaceae
Info Cap with curled gills of a Laccaria laccata (deceiver, lackluster laccaria) Focus stack of 13 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:47, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:47, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Woah! -- Szeremeta (talk) 13:13, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 13:56, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 17:06, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:10, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support What are the rows of red spots? Ermell (talk) 20:41, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Done, False pixels removed. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:55, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, I still see 4 red hot pixels bottom center after clearing my cache twice. Amazing photo! I will support after you remove those. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:58, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Done, Hopefully they've all been removed now. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 09:24, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Yes indeed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:26, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Impressive - it reminds me of a microscopic image of a biological structure. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:49, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:08, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Llez (talk) 16:01, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Weak support The highest point of the fungus has a halo around it which shouldn't be there, otherwise great detail Poco a poco (talk) 22:07, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Per Poco a poco, I would keep the highlight but remove the halo around it. Nevertheless it's a great work! --Syntaxys (talk) 07:59, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:53, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 16:17, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. heylenny (talk/edits) 23:28, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice picture! I like it's all orange and brown... and the fungi looks like a flower or some kind of art. The background shapes works well with the pictured objekt (the fungi). :-) Zquid (talk) 10:28, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2025 at 01:31:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Optical devices
Info created by Cvmontuy – uploaded by Cvmontuy – nominated by Cvmontuy -- Cvmontuy (talk) 01:31, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Cvmontuy (talk) 01:31, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent lighting and composition. -- Szeremeta (talk) 13:13, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 13:55, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I recognize a good attempt but for an FP nom of a small product image but you need to go further. The background needs to be a uniform white (preferred) that separates the black lenses from the background. Also, each of the lenses or tubes should be clearly identified by the manufacturer’s official name for best use in the Wikis going forward. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:51, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
- The item identification has been done --Cvmontuy (talk) 20:32, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:45, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. A beautiful composition. The enclosed space adds visual depth. It looks more artistic than a boring white background. -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:50, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:30, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Fully agree with George. – Aristeas (talk) 21:14, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:53, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:56, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support heylenny (talk/edits) 23:09, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2025 at 17:03:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phasianidae_(Grouse,_Partridges,_Peafowl,_Pheasants,_Quail,_Turkeys)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 17:03, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 17:03, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment Would be great if you could use it on another wiki (so much better than infobox image on enwiki). Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:45, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- I don't know how to do that, I hope someone experienced will help with it. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:35, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Done If it is obvious yours has more EV, then just change image name in infobox and change image caption if necessary. You can also use a crop template to make it display better - see my current FPC for American kestrel.Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:43, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you so much. I have seen it, the crop template excellent for image thumbnails. I will surely try to use it in future. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 17:02, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
- I don't know how to do that, I hope someone experienced will help with it. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 08:35, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support – Very cool. – Szeremeta (talk) 13:11, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 13:54, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 17:07, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:45, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support –- George Chernilevsky talk 21:44, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:59, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Pretty bird, fine capture and nice composition. Per https://theworldsrarestbirds.com/painted-francolin/: "Painted Francolins typically measure 25 to 30 centimeters in length." If that's accurate, it could be added to w:Painted francolin. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:02, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- Measurements seems close to me but I cannot confirm that it is exactly between 25 to 30 centimeters and my previous edit was also reverted. Please check this Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 10:53, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- Not sure why the bird is on a website called theworldsrarestbirds. The painted francolin is IUCN Least Concern. Over 14,000 observations on ebird.. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:12, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- I have no idea on that. I get what happened in the revert, Tisha. Wikipedia demands references for trivial things like sizes of birds and reverts primary-source information. I sometimes forget about these things. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:23, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- Not sure why the bird is on a website called theworldsrarestbirds. The painted francolin is IUCN Least Concern. Over 14,000 observations on ebird.. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:12, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- Measurements seems close to me but I cannot confirm that it is exactly between 25 to 30 centimeters and my previous edit was also reverted. Please check this Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 10:53, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:26, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Llez (talk) 16:01, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 21:10, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 22:05, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Great work with fine details! --Syntaxys (talk) 08:03, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Syntaxys. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:34, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support One of your best Cmao20 (talk) 14:52, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:56, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2025 at 14:38:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Coraciiformes#Genus_:_Chloroceryle
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:38, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:38, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:38, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support - the bar is high for kingfisher FPs these days, but in addition to being tiny, these guys are skittish and less common. Only one I found was by chance, curled up in a sleepyball, at night while I was out looking for frogs. :) Total aside: for the bird nerds watching, I recently discovered birdstat.com, which will process your ebird data in all sorts of interesting ways. Among them is ranking your sightings by rarity. American pygmy kingfisher is, apparently, the 14th rarest of the list I've seen (top being keel-billed motmot). Folks like Giles and Charles have traveled much more extensively than me, so it might be especially fun to compile all of yours. FYI. — Rhododendrites talk | 16:50, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- I don't upload to eBird and I've never understood why eBird/Merlin doesn't do subspecies. The Merlin app. is brilliant though. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:04, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- ebird does do subspecies. — Rhododendrites talk | 19:06, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- OK. But the search doesn't work for subspecies. I searched for Principe kingfisher to see how rare it was. It is listed as Malachite Kingfisher (Principe) (29 photos) but you can't seach for it. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:19, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- ebird does do subspecies. — Rhododendrites talk | 19:06, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for your message Rhododendrites. There are 5 different species of Kingfisher in the Pantanal: the Green kingfisher, the Amazon kingfisher, the Ringed kingfisher, the American pygmy kingfisher and the Green-and-rufous Kingfisher. I've managed to see the first four but not the last one. The three first are quite common to find but the American pygmy kingfisher is indeed harder to spot because it is more rare and smaller in size. I've only managed to see one after specifically asking to the boat driver if he knew where to find one and searching multiple times in a spot where one had been seen in the past. As for birdstats I've never tried it but I might give it a shot one day :) -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:28, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
- I don't upload to eBird and I've never understood why eBird/Merlin doesn't do subspecies. The Merlin app. is brilliant though. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:04, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Noice!!! Wolverine X-eye 16:54, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Excellent. -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 17:08, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:59, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:36, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 07:03, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:50, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:08, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support – I love the colors on this one. – Szeremeta (talk) 13:11, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 13:53, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:35, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:09, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 20:47, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 06:43, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:24, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 21:10, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Looks a bit overprocessed to me but overall FP Poco a poco (talk) 22:04, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Milseburg (talk) 12:55, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:51, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
File:Ruby-crowned kinglet (14077).jpg, featured
Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2025 at 03:32:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Regulidae_(Kinglets)
Info Ruby-crowned kinglet (Corthylio calendula) adult, one of the smallest birds (other than hummingbirds) in North America. The only one smaller is its cousin the golden-crowned kinglet. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 03:32, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support — Rhododendrites talk | 03:32, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 04:50, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 06:48, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Very pretty, nice bokeh. —Bruce1eetalk 07:46, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 07:56, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 08:05, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Bruce1ee. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:29, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:49, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per Bruce1ee... --Terragio67 (talk) 14:31, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful. -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 17:14, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 18:00, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support These guys are so difficult to capture. Great work! --Polinova (talk) 18:21, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks. Any photo of a kinglet that isn't blurry is almost misleading -- as though they stay in any one place for more than a half-second. :) — Rhododendrites talk | 18:33, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- Never seen one but are they as difficult to photograph as a skulking tapacolo? Sightings = ~5. Photos = 0. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:09, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- The two kinglets are far from rare. Plentiful during migration around these parts. They're just tiny and hyperactive. I've probably seen them a hundred times over the years, but maybe 4-5 halfway-decent photos. — Rhododendrites talk | 19:17, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- Never seen one but are they as difficult to photograph as a skulking tapacolo? Sightings = ~5. Photos = 0. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:09, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks. Any photo of a kinglet that isn't blurry is almost misleading -- as though they stay in any one place for more than a half-second. :) — Rhododendrites talk | 18:33, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support That's really impressive! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:41, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:08, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:01, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support – Excellent! – Szeremeta (talk) 13:10, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per Polinova. – Aristeas (talk) 21:10, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 22:05, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:50, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2025 at 18:01:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Uzbekistan
Info Chor Minor mosque, Buhara (Чор-Минор, Бухара). Chor Minor means "Four Minaretes" -- Mile (talk) 18:01, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 18:01, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:38, 5 November 2025 (UTC)Good to me, and the stork couple is a nice bonus. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:42, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support
- The complaints about the darkness in the sky are valid, so I've crossed out my vote, though my comments stand. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:02, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:07, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:09, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:30, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Why didn’t you take the photo from the front? I think it would look nicer. --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 18:26, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
- I feel like the depth with the four pillars wouldn't be as clear that way. TheBritinator (talk) 23:55, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment TheBritinator explained. That case you see just more-or-less 2 minarets...of mosque named "Four minarets". But have that too. Here is more representful. --Mile (talk) 09:31, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:19, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment Sky looks unnaturally dark for a daytime image. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:19, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment CPL filter. --Mile (talk) 09:34, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment Was the CPL useful to get a clearer image of the mosque? If yes, well done. However nothing stops you from reducing the extreme effect on the sky in post-processing. Right now the sky looks indeed unnaturally dark. – Aristeas (talk) 15:17, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment @Aristeas reply is on my 1st photo above. --Mile (talk) 16:41, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 10:12, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose -- There is no such DARK SKY at this time of day. Je-str (talk) 21:26, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose. Bad angle of the building. heylenny (talk/edits) 23:25, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2025 at 17:59:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Religion#Islam
Info created and uploaded by Panpanchik – nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 17:59, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Красный wanna talk? 17:59, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Very nice, although it could possibly do with a couple more categories Cmao20 (talk) 14:47, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Poor quality. Not sharp enough for me. heylenny (talk/edits) 23:23, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose I'm a bit on the fence about this one. I'm not convinced this is sharp enough for FP, and the resolution is quite low too. TheBritinator (talk) 12:46, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2025 at 13:16:21 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family_:_Strophariaceae
Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:16, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:16, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose The usage of the flash is too obvious, the result is not the best. Sorry, George Poco a poco (talk) 17:37, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support heylenny (talk/edits) 18:20, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Very good details. The flash doesn't bother me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:42, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support A great photo of a mushroom trying to kill a gnarled, weathered birch tree and nearly falling into ruin itself.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:58, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 11:03, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 14:17, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:11, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:59, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I agree with Poco a poco. I find the use of flash too obvious, sorry. TheBritinator (talk) 23:51, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment I am undecided, so I would prefer not to submit a rating. On the one hand, the image has high educational value due to the richness of detail in the habitus, but on the other hand, the flash also bothers me in this composition. Since I photograph such subjects myself, I know that it is almost impossible to take a sharp picture in a dark forest without a flash or tripod. At this distance, you need at least an aperture of 8 for sufficient depth of field, and even at ISO 400, the shutter speeds are longer than 1/30 s, which can only be achieved with image stabilisation to get a reasonably sharp image. This shot is surely a good QI, but I would not have nominated it for FP. --Syntaxys (talk) 08:52, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comment.
- My forest photography trips aren't like strolling through a city park. My boots allow me to traverse marshy areas. I wear clothes that allow me to take photos on my knees and lying on the ground. This is necessary when photographing small animals (snails, lizards, hedgehogs, etc.) and also when photographing mushrooms. I take my camera, an external flash with several filters, and softboxes. I also take at least three lenses, extension tubes, and two tripods (full-size and macro). I also have spare batteries and lens cleaning supplies. With all my gear, I walk 15-20 kilometers through the forest and then return to the road to civilization.
- If I'm taking photos, I try several aperture settings and softbox options. For shots like this, I try to reduce the flash enough to avoid harsh lighting. In a very dark forest, getting a good shot without a flash is simply impossible. And this nominated shot is truly the best of several variants in the serie. -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:00, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
- You weigh more than I do, hats off to you. I have my much smaller equipment on my bike and it takes me less than five minutes to get to the heart of the forest. :-)
- I took a closer look at the category; quite a few of the pictures are flashed too and most of the rest are at least partially out of focus. However, there is one nice picture of yours that I would have preferred, even though you can't see the gills in it. They are important too for a correct determination, of course, but the habitus is clearly recognisable and it's beautifully composed. Syntaxys (talk) 17:13, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Flash makes the light a bit harsh, but outstanding composition and quality Cmao20 (talk) 14:43, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:50, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2025 at 10:36:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues outdoors
Info created by TheBritinator – uploaded by TheBritinator – nominated by TheBritinator -- TheBritinator (talk) 10:36, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- TheBritinator (talk) 10:36, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cool sculpture. I don't know what others will think of the lighting, but I find it fine and like the angle and how it captures the gesture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:44, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:50, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:29, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose The shot is fine but it lacks something for FP. I'd have probably chosed the other side and the face lacks detail Poco a poco (talk) 21:57, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, what do you mean by the other side? There is a downhill drop to the left and there is a tree behind it. TheBritinator (talk) 00:01, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Beautiful and imposing, nice light Cmao20 (talk) 14:43, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose. Good quality, but a bit dull in daylight. Perhaps this monument looks much better in the morning or in the evening. It lacks the "wow" factor. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:59, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Unappealing light in my view. It would have been better if the enlighten side was in front of us, rather than behind -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:16, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2025 at 08:05:08 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Tunisia
Info created by Skander Zarrad – uploaded by Skander Zarrad – nominated by Ovva olfa -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 08:05, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 08:05, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:47, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Maybe it needs a little rotation. heylenny (talk/edits) 18:24, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:39, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:59, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support technically very solid - the lateral light works remarkably well here, with convincing depth even without direct illumination on the arch. A slight perspective correction on the right side only could be beneficial. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:13, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:43, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Beautifully monumental. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:49, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:49, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Cannot support this with the subject in shadow. I don't really get all these supporting votes. I would have enjoyed a nice light showing the texture of the arch. Poco a poco (talk) 21:54, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
- I can't answer for others, but the details on the arch are all highly visible, and its being darker actually accentuates it in this context. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:47, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Lighting is not ideal but composition and quality are FP Cmao20 (talk) 14:42, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per Ikan. – Aristeas (talk) 19:25, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2025 at 20:54:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family : Amaryllidaceae
Info Flower of a garlic plant in a garden in Bavaria. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 20:54, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ermell (talk) 20:54, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Pretty. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:42, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:33, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 08:02, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. TheBritinator (talk) 10:52, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:39, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 15:46, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 16:15, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 21:45, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:38, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:40, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 14:36, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:02, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:52, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 21:07, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I'm sorry, but those wet areas look overprocessed, too much sharpness, I'm afraid. Poco a poco (talk) 21:41, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose I'll be honest, I do see Poco's point. Composition is great but I think this does seem to be oversharpened, unlike your usual focus stacks. Cmao20 (talk) 14:40, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Support heylenny (talk/edits) 23:20, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2025 at 18:55:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Order : Tetraodontiformes
Info Halfmoon triggerfish (Sufflamen chrysopterum), Anilao, Philippines. It lives around seaward reefs and shallow lagoons in the tropical Indo-West Pacific area. It is solitary and is often found around coral looking for small invertebrates, like crustaceans and worms, on which it feeds. Note: there are no FPs on Commons of the genus Sufflamen. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 18:55, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 18:55, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment At the moment this is your third active nommination, isn't it? --Milseburg (talk) 21:00, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
- No, it isn't. I've only another one active that was nominated by me. Poco a poco (talk) 21:27, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
- Yesterday Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Playa de Levante, Benidorm, España, 2014-07-02, DD 86.JPG was also still active. Milseburg (talk) 06:27, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- The rules here say that a nom is over after 5 days if it has got at least 10 supporting votes and no opposes. It's not essential when the bot tags it. Poco a poco (talk) 06:48, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Indeed, hence the text Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2025 at 18:55:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule). The statement about the fifth-day rule is a recent addition designed to make it clear that Poco's understanding in this case is correct. Cmao20 (talk) 11:01, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, but it have to be closed first, I think. Milseburg (talk) 19:56, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
- Indeed, hence the text Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2025 at 18:55:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule). The statement about the fifth-day rule is a recent addition designed to make it clear that Poco's understanding in this case is correct. Cmao20 (talk) 11:01, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
- No, it isn't. I've only another one active that was nominated by me. Poco a poco (talk) 21:27, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Good to me. I assume that is part of a green background and not green CA on the upper tip of the uppermost fin. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:52, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks, will improve that tonight CET Poco a poco (talk) 06:50, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 04:20, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:45, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Great Cmao20 (talk) 11:01, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 16:55, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2025 at 21:20:20 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Brazil
Info created and uploaded by Prburley – nominated by Falcão Alado -- Falcão Alado (talk) 21:20, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Falcão Alado (talk) 21:20, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Neutral A beautiful shot, but I think the depth of field could be better. The foreground is also a little too bright. --XRay 💬 07:40, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- I agree. heylenny (talk/edits) 22:03, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Honestly prefer this version (wider framing is more satisfying) but both are FP. Cmao20 (talk) 10:58, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I agree that this is a more interesting view, but the bar is very high for church interiors, and I agree with XRay that the depth of field could be better, and I would go further and say it should be for a feature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:03, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Good photo but the lighting is quite bland. Not FP quality, in my opinion. TheBritinator (talk) 00:05, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Alternative
Info @XRay: I found another author's photo but with better framing and lighting IMO. heylenny (talk/edits) 22:03, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Also a good version if consensus forms around it Cmao20 (talk) 10:58, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per my comments above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:04, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2025 at 20:48:30 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others
Info created by MTur Destinos – initially uploaded by Sintegrity – cropped by Heylenny – nominated by Falcão Alado -- Falcão Alado (talk) 20:48, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Colorful and beautiful handmade artwork, representing the native people of the region. -- Falcão Alado (talk) 20:48, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment Interesting artworks, but they are partially hidden. Yann (talk) 20:54, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. I thought this was interesting too. But agree with Yann that they're a bit hidden. I tried to center them by cropping this image. Anyway, it's rare to see photos of the Amazonian art in its homeland (it was taken in Boa Vista, a city in the Amazon forest), even on Commons; I think it deserves some recognition, IMHO. heylenny (talk/edits) 21:58, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose The subject looks a little too soft for my taste --Cvmontuy (talk) 13:09, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per Yann, and I would need more information to come to the conclusio that this is FP-worthy Poco a poco (talk) 17:30, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Interesting but agree with Poco that I'm unsure whether it is outstanding, and the image quality is not the best Cmao20 (talk) 10:57, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2025 at 13:54:18 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Italy
Info created by Matteo Pappadopoli – uploaded by Matteo Pappadopoli – nominated by EUPBR -- EUPBR (talk) 13:54, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- EUPBR (talk) 13:54, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. heylenny (talk/edits) 22:19, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Comment @Matteo Pappadopoli What camera, EXIF ? --Mile (talk) 16:53, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Also, is it dawn or dusk? I feel like I can't support a feature of this romantic and otherwise featurable photo unless at least that question is answered. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:06, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:32, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:56, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 16:11, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support A bit soft (too bad that we don't have EXIF data), but in any case a stunning, extraordinary picture. --Plozessor (talk) 17:44, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:37, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Any technical issues more than mitigated by excellent composition and light Cmao20 (talk) 10:55, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:29, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 17:17, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Wonderful composition, light and mood. I wanted to nominated this myself, but hesitated because of the somewhat slushy details – probably too much noise reduction?! –; but certainly I must support it. – Aristeas (talk) 20:53, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2025 at 10:37:01 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#India
Info created and uploaded by Rainer Halama – nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:37, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:37, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. heylenny (talk/edits) 22:20, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Pretty and of decent quality but not outstanding to become one of our finest, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 17:28, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Special to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:12, 4 November 2025 (UTC)- Weak
Support Good composition, but some minor issues. The waterfall at the top is very bright. The highlights should be reduced. --XRay 💬 07:39, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:56, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 16:07, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--But per XRay, the water is a bit washed out white in my opinion.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:17, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:37, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Pleasant composition and good quality Cmao20 (talk) 10:54, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:28, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Composition is not remarkable IMO. The picture is divided by a horizontal line without anything to connect the foreground to the waterfall in the back. Lighting is also a bit flat. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:16, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2025 at 05:27:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Pinaceae
Info Aekingerzand Drents-Friese Wold National Park. Pinus sylvestris on the sand drift.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:27, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:27, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Pristine! Wolverine X-eye 15:46, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. heylenny (talk/edits) 22:21, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:00, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:16, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Not an outstanding compo/subject IMHO, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 17:42, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I agree with you again. And no outstanding composition to make up for it, sorry. I understand why you like the photo, though, as 2 of the trees, particularly the one on the left, are individually interesting to look at. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:27, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Interesting contrast in colors between the evergreen trees, the yellow of the dry grass, and the purple flowers of the other shrubs. Good reproduction of the habitat of the sand dunes, imho. --Harlock81 (talk) 15:43, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:36, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 04:17, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support as per Harlock81. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:57, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support per Harlock81. – Aristeas (talk) 20:50, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Very nice portrait of a heath landscape, but the noise bothers me a little. --Syntaxys (talk) 05:49, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Done. Small correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:45, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2025 at 21:34:18 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Entertainment#Film
Info created by Gaumont Co. Ltd. – uploaded by Fæ – nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 21:34, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Ezarateesteban 21:34, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
- I'd be inclined to take the distortion from true 90° angles as just camera distortion and fix it, and neaten up the edges for width and ideally brightness. Otherwise, an excellent image with fairly minor damage. Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:51, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
- Adam Cuerden fixed, and scratches too, thanks! --Ezarateesteban 16:53, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Info The movie poster is based on this original photo. Regards, Christoph Braun (talk) 08:10, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Support The picture is in my TODO list, but there is a lot of work. --Yann (talk) 20:55, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. heylenny (talk/edits) 22:21, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:25, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:16, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Support I really like it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:12, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:36, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 04:17, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 10:03, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 23:21, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
- What's wrong with the gallery? I see Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Entertainment#Film, but when I put that in "gallery" in the FPC-results-reviewed template, it redlinks. What gives? And why did I have to insert that manually in the first place? Please help. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:52, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
- Based on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ruby-crowned kinglet (14077).jpg , I needed to subtract Commons:Featured pictures/ from the gallery. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:54, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2025 at 11:55:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural_phenomena#Crepuscular_rays
Comment A moody morning in Drenthe near Aalden. Visible are crepuscular rays. A diffraction effect can also be seen on the leaves on the left side, causing them to appear slightly bluish. Although this photo was created on the same morning as my previous FPC I think this photo shows a completely different side of the same morning.
Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 11:55, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 11:55, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:22, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. heylenny (talk/edits) 22:22, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 07:57, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:20, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Really interesting documentation, but it lacks the really good composition of the other FP. However, if others feel that the documentation element is sufficient for a feature or disagree with me about the composition, they should support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:05, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Neutral In my opinion the first photo was much better.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:08, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Nice composition, I love the bokeh and the light. The other FP is good but more conventional; this is bolder and more daring Cmao20 (talk) 04:14, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2025 at 08:25:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Tunisia
Info all by me -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 08:25, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Blurred nearest foreground at full size, but that's not the point. What makes this photo is light, atmosphere, foreground architecture and the hills. w:Impression, Sunrise is of course less realist than this photo, but the background in this photo reminds me a lot of that, in that the details of the landscape are less important than the light shining on them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:41, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 11:44, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 13:34, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:01, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:19, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Very unsharp, and the light spot on the right side is too disturbing. Sorry. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:02, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Categorization could be better. --XRay 💬 07:42, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
- Hi
- I added a category "Ksour" to the photo it is a global category and it is the plural of the word "Ksar" in arbic. IssamBarhoumi (talk) 14:32, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:35, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Definitely not 'very unsharp.' Quality is not perfect, but overall this is good enough for me Cmao20 (talk) 04:13, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Agree with Cmao20’s defence of the image. Beautiful light and nice mood. – Aristeas (talk) 20:47, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
Support heylenny (talk/edits) 23:19, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2025 at 17:31:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Doors
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:31, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:31, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
Support I really like this composition. It's not entirely sharp at full size on my external monitor, but it doesn't have to be and is sharp at a big enough size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:41, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:17, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:35, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:56, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
Support. heylenny (talk/edits) 22:24, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, I don't see anything special here. —kallerna (talk)
Support --B. Jankuloski (talk) 20:15, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry but although this is a good QI I really do agree with Kallerna, I don't see an outstanding composition. Too much of the door is obscured so that the most interesting part of the image - the shapes and textures around the door - is not shown in full Cmao20 (talk) 03:49, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I concur, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 18:42, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Nice but wow factor missing, sorry --Cvmontuy (talk) 11:30, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 23:22, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Quality image but unspectacular content, in my view. I don't find the greenery really exceptional in this situation -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:20, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Good technical quality but nothing remarkable for FP. TheBritinator (talk) 12:51, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:01, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Wed 05 Nov → Mon 10 Nov Thu 06 Nov → Tue 11 Nov Fri 07 Nov → Wed 12 Nov Sat 08 Nov → Thu 13 Nov Sun 09 Nov → Fri 14 Nov Mon 10 Nov → Sat 15 Nov
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Sat 01 Nov → Mon 10 Nov Sun 02 Nov → Tue 11 Nov Mon 03 Nov → Wed 12 Nov Tue 04 Nov → Thu 13 Nov Wed 05 Nov → Fri 14 Nov Thu 06 Nov → Sat 15 Nov Fri 07 Nov → Sun 16 Nov Sat 08 Nov → Mon 17 Nov Sun 09 Nov → Tue 18 Nov Mon 10 Nov → Wed 19 Nov
Closing a featured picture promotion request
The bot
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag featured or not featured – for example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the com-nom parameter. For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another Wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the nominator. For set nominations, use:
== Set Promoted to FP ==
<gallery>
File:XXXXXX.jpg
File:XXXXXX.jpg
</gallery>
{{FPpromotionSet2|YYYYY}}, using the names of the set files instead of the XXXXXX and the title of the set instead of YYYYY. - Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedUploader|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the user who has uploaded the image, if that user is not the same as the nominator. - Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedCreator|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the talk page of the creator, if the author is a different Commons user than nominator and uploader.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/November 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
{{FPC-delist-results-reviewed|delist=x|keep=x|neutral=x|delisted=yes/no|sig=~~~~}}
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Ensifera ensifera (22271195865).jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/November 2025.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes). If the image description page uses the old {{Featured picture}} template, replace it with {{Assessments|featured=2}}.
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture must not be removed from the chronological list.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/November 2025), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
