Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Designing Digitally

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:55, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Designing Digitally (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company. I can't find any substantial coverage in reliable sources. There was previously an ad on upwork where the company was looking for someone to create a page, so this was presumably created for pay. SmartSE (talk) 19:17, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 03:04, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 03:04, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 03:04, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, I opened half of the refs and they follow a pattern of trivial mentions attempting to synthesise notability, it is tagged with paid and looks paid/coi. It's just a small company failing gng and looking to advertise its wares here, no prejudice against recreation with RS. Szzuk (talk) 18:44, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as seriously failing WP:NCORP. I spot-checked a few of the references that looked the most promising from their titles, and in all cases found just some name-drops. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:29, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.