Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Giuseppa Robucci

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CommanderLinx (talk | contribs) at 19:01, 14 July 2019 (Maria Giuseppa Robucci: delete/redirect). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Maria Giuseppa Robucci (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article and sources do not assert notability beyond reaching an advanced age: she was born, had children, got very old, chopped wood, broke a hip, and died. This lady's placement in our List of Italian supercentenarians is sufficient (with a redirect on her name). — JFG talk 23:21, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - sustained significant coverage over the course of 15+ years. It doesn't matter why she's notable, just that she is notable. Once she is deemed to be notable, then a basic biography of her life is warranted, and there's more than enough info for a stand-alone biography. schetm (talk) 01:56, 12 July 2019(UTC)
She did NOT have "15 years" of WP:SIGCOV. There was one short feature for her 100th birthday, as is extremely common, and over 10 years later she got some WP:ROUTINE oldster coverage over a few years. There is nothing notable about her that doesn't fit snuggly in a list entry. Newshunter12 (talk) 03:03, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CThomas3 (talk) 04:25, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CThomas3 (talk) 04:25, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CThomas3 (talk) 04:25, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - There's a lot of room for interpretation of WP:NOPAGE and WP:ROUTINE. Even though it is common for subjects like this to receive coverage on their 100th birthday, reaching 100 is extraordinary.[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kvng (talkcontribs)

References