Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DataRobot
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:53, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- DataRobot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Straight up WP:ARTSPAM with little coverage, mostly WP:MILL and press releases. Praxidicae (talk) 23:21, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 00:16, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 00:16, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Not notable. No significant coverage from reliable sources. Doesn't meet WP:CORP, particularly WP:CORPDEPTH. Cited Forbes.com articles are from contributors. — Newslinger talk 04:03, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.