Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Spatium apis (talk | contribs) at 15:30, 5 August 2017 (Achelousaurus). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Guild homeHow to copy editTemplatesBarnstarsParticipantsCoordinators
RequestsDrivesBlitzesMailing listNewsletters
Guild of Copy Editors' requests page

On this page, you can request that the Guild of Copy Editors copy-edit specific articles.

Instructions for requesters

To make a request, remove any existing {{copy edit}} tags from the article, then click this button and follow the instructions:

Please remove any existing {{copy edit}} tags from the article to avoid edit conflicts during the copy edit.

Please note:

  • No request by an unregistered editor will be accepted unless the IP has done significant work on the article. Drive-by IP requests already on the list may be declined by any editor.
  • The average waiting time is two or so months. Please be patient and feel free to improve your requested article while you wait.
  • If you plan to nominate the article for good article, A-class or featured article status, please wait until the copy edit is complete before nominating it.
  • Having your article copy edited by our team does not guarantee that the prose will be considered acceptable during any of the above reviews.
  • You may have up to two open requests at any one time. This is enforced so that every request can have a fair chance of being fulfilled within a reasonable period.

Requests may be declined if the article is:


May 2017

Replace "Articlename" above with the title of the article you are requesting. Replace these instructions with your comments. Leave the tildes in place so that your signature is appended to the request. Gmhardesty (talk) 04:29, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Vansk007 started article but did not complete it.
Let me have a go...  WorkingBroVic (talk) 17:38, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Requesting a copy-edit of this article before submitting for good article status. Thanks in advance. Punyaboy (talk) 14:54, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Working Keira1996 23:59, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You've been at this for a while. Need any help? BroVic (talk) 17:04, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Per my talk page and the coordinators talk page I've been on Wikibreak and had intended to untag this, but am now working on it again. Thanks, however! Keira1996 14:09, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article became GA years ago and it got a lot of new content. Take your time considering its size. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 21:51, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Working Quae legit (talk) 19:58, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A thorough copy-editing would be perfect for my future GA/FA nominations.Krish | Talk 15:46, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Working Miniapolis 14:34, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

B class article with a lot of content. Could use a copyedit. Harizotoh9 (talk) 04:32, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Working Seraphim System (talk) 01:10, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Note: Waiting for response to queries on article's talk page.)

I would like to promote this article to FA, and while I believe it is close to standards, I think it still has a few issues that need to be addressed. Consequently, a copy-edit would really make it shine. (Of note, the article was criticized at a previous FAN for being written in an inappropriate—i.e., overly-academic—register, and if a willing copy-editor could 'take it down a notch', I'd be grateful.)--Gen. Quon (Talk) 18:16, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting a copy-edit of this article before submitting for good article status. Thanks--Anandmoorti (talk) 04:43, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting a thorough copy-edit of this article. Thanks--Anandmoorti (talk) 05:01, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article has just been rewritten not too long ago. Please help to give it a good copyedit. Perhaps, it has potential to be nominated for a GA in the future. Thank you very much. TerryAlex (talk) 04:44, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A thorough copy-editing would be perfect for my future GA/FA nominations. Teodan511 (talk) 06:47, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Teodan511, you have about 40 edits in 7 years, and have never added more than a sentence or two. I strongly suggest you don't waste editors time with a GA/FA nom on this high-profile and highly-viewed article. No-one who does not have perfect English and a wide-ranging subject knowledge should attempt anything more than minor corrections here. I'm saying the same for Christianity just below. Johnbod (talk) 01:26, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Created article, could use a copy-edit to polish and strengthen prose for GA nomination. Thanks – jona 16:33, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will be nominating this article for GA. For references, check out Romance (Luis Miguel album), Segundo Romance, and Romances (Luis Miguel album). Thanks in advance! Erick (talk) 01:11, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting a copy-edit of this article before submitting for good article status.--Rainonthesun (talk) 08:22, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rainonthesun, you have about 14 edits in 3 years, and have never added more than a sentence or two. I strongly suggest you don't waste editors time with a GA nom on this high-profile and highly-viewed article. No-one who does not have perfect English and a wide-ranging subject knowledge should attempt anything more than minor corrections here. I'm saying the same for Islam just above. Johnbod (talk) 01:28, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've recently done a great deal of research and improved and expanded the page. Would appreciate a copyedit to improve it further. Thank you ! Sagecandor (talk) 04:55, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

information Note: Will probably survive this AfD. Miniapolis 23:03, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Newly created article on a subregion of South Asia. Thanks in advance. Fez Cap 12 (talk) 13:23, 19 July 2017 (UTC)  Working  – Corinne (talk) 02:08, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is one of the first GAs I made so I'm not sure its prose is good. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 15:38, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting coy edit on the article of the film Terminator Salvation. Again, thanks. NeoBatfreak (talk) 19:14, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Working Tdts5 (talk) 17:20, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
information Note: Waiting on question posted to talk page about potential copy/paste violations.

I recently expanded the article. Would like a copy-edit before I nominate it at GAN. MWright96 (talk) 12:29, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs a thorough going-over by a copy editor. Thank you.Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 14:24, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article is not very long, any help is greatly appreciated. Thank you. Gryffindor (talk) 17:10, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Planning on taking this article to FAC in the near future. It's a very interesting story, a small-scale nuclear reactor used for experiments and now the center of a court case between the university and city government over the preservation of historic buildings. Even though it's been demolished, there is still more content to be worked in. SounderBruce 23:13, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I created this article some years ago and recently expanded so I think it needs better prose. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 14:44, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I hope to get this to GA soon. 1989 06:04, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to bring this article up to FA or at least A-class. Thanks. Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 06:35, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting a copy edit for this "soon-to-be-nominated-for-Good-article-status" article. Much appreciated! --Another Believer (Talk) 22:35, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @Another Believer: I said that I was going to copy-edit this article, but because it has been proposed that it be merged into another article, I don't think it is stable enough for that. Please see the discussion on the Requests talk page. N Oneemuss (talk to me · see my edits · email me) 13:19, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We're determined to get this article promoted to Good status, much like we did for the Not My Presidents Day article. I'm confident the article will be kept, even if we have to rescue it, (again) like we did for the NMPD article. But if you prefer to wait until the discussion has closed before considering a review, I understand. ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:20, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Esentially a new article. Would like a review; planning to nominate for DYK Thanks. MB 00:55, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I intend to submit this for WP:FAR, so it will need great c/e before that. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:51, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting a copy-edit of this article before submitting for good article status. Brankestein (talk) 20:44, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am planning to nominate it for a GA, and eventually and FA. A lot of work was put into it, and a great ce would really appreciated. Thank you very much in advance. Adityavagarwal (talk) 15:39, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have recently expanded on this list and I would greatly appreciate a c/e. I am considering putting this up for FLC, but I am still on the fence about it. Thank you in advance! Aoba47 (talk) 16:39, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Working to bring this up to GA status. Saqib (talk) 05:10, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Planning to take to GA. Yeepsi (talk) 22:05, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been improved significantly, recently. Aiming a shot at GAN, and then at FAC. I have checked for any errors, but of course if somebody from the Guild of Copy Editors checked the article, it would be at another level! Thank you very much in advance. Adityavagarwal (talk) 03:43, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Working David Thibault (talk) 21:54, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dinosaur, to prepare for GAN and FAC, thanks. FunkMonk (talk) 18:36, 30 July 2017 (UTC)  Working --Spatium apis (talk) 19:01, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Spatium apis, I was expecting at least a month of waiting, so I must admit the article isn't quite ready for copy-edit yet. Would you mind waiting a couple of weeks? FunkMonk (talk) 14:23, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
FunkMonk Sure! I'll check back in a while. In the meantime I'll leave my working marker up. Spatium apis (talk) 15:30, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The History, Politics, Economy and Demographics sections have undergone changes. Thank you. Fez Cap 12 (talk) 23:28, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

A bunch of problems with the article. An entire section regarding the "MICHIGAN INCOME TAX ACT OF 1967" that may need to be removed, and the lead section gives several conflicting definitions for "wage" and "wages". Power~enwiki (talk) 03:21, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am not the best writer but if anyone can help with this that would be great! --TheDomain (talk) 02:46, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This other article works closely with the above subject on the same TV Show. If anyone can take a look that would be perfect! --TheDomain (talk) 02:46, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article is eligible for WP:DYK, but need copy editing because of "broken English". Can you help me, please? Holapaco77 (talk) 06:58, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article is about a decree which prohibited the persecution of people on religious ground. Before its FAC, the article needs a thorough copyedit. Thank you for your work in advance. Borsoka (talk) 09:13, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request a copy edit on this article. I would welcome any input in order to improve it. Seiya (talk) 13:18, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]