Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All Syllabus
Appearance
- All Syllabus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a website that seems to fail WP:WEBCRIT. The sources cited in the article are questionable and other independent source are not available. - MrX 13:09, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:37, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:37, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:37, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:38, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- Written like an ad, no reliable sources that I can find for this, as a proper noun. I might have even tried speedily deleting it as unambiguous advertising but the nominator is right to bring it here, I'm sure. Delete. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:39, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete as copyvio of a site on the blacklist which dates to May while this is only recently here. SO tagged StarM 23:53, 23 June 2017 (UTC)