Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Miller (software developer)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AllyD (talk | contribs) at 05:39, 3 May 2014 (Dave Miller (software developer): del). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Dave Miller (software developer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual. References are to an automated statistics site, non-independent sites (Mozilla, Bugzilla), and a blog. No significant coverage of this individual from independent secondary sources. "We require 'significant coverage' in reliable sources so that we can actually write a whole article, rather than half a paragraph or a definition of that topic. If only a few sentences could be written and supported by sources about the subject, that subject does not qualify for a separate page, but should instead be merged into an article about a larger topic or relevant list." This article has existed for almost a decade, has had a notability warning for 2 years, and has still failed to get beyond the few sentences stage. Mozilla and Bugzilla are the notable topics here, not the individual. Chris Bainbridge (talk) 17:34, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:52, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]