Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Nepal

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Nepal. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Nepal|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Nepal. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to Asia.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Nepal/archive

Purge page cache

watch

Nepal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 12:51, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Traditional songs of Kathmandu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Probably not an appropriate article for that. Some of the page's content is described at Music of Nepal but I do not think that redirection or merge would suffice. Article was moved to draftspace despite one decline, and I could not find any sources describing this topic and not the music of the country in general. ToadetteEdit (7M articles) 06:59, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Nepal. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:57, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Poorly written article. The title of the article doesn't match the article. Maybe Newar music? But there doesn't seem to be enough differences between Newar music and Nepalese one. I don't see any way to salvage this article. — Itzcuauhtli11 (talk) 14:21, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Definitely original research and looks like a student term paper. No Wikipedia article has the author's name at the top, and this is most of that user's work on WP. Everyone starts somewhere, so I encourage this person to make constructive contributions to existing articles on Nepalese music and the like. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 16:09, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom Laura240406 (talk) 17:40, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I have multiple concerns regarding this article. Firstly, there is disconnect between the title and the content and this makes it difficult to understand the article’s actual aim and scope. Secondly, it reads more like a personal blog post and parts of it appear to be copied from elsewhere.More importantly, the article seems to misrepresent Newa (Newar) culture as the sole or defining traditional music of Kathmandu. which is not true in real sense. Kathmandu has historically been home to a diverse castes, ethnic groups, and religious communities. And each of them have been contributing to its culture. Presenting Newar traditions as representative of all traditional music in Kathmandu oversimplifies it. A quick search reveals multiple reliable sources that describe a more complex musical heritage, not limited to a single ethnic group. In its current form, the article lacks notability, and fails to meet Wikipedia’s standards for verifiability and neutrality. While the topic might be notable if approached from a broader and more balanced angle. this particular version does not add encyclopaedic value in my opinion. Rahmatula786 (talk) 15:51, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: unreferenced and rambling essay. Fails WP:GNG 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 22:05, 31 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sunilkapali 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 12:14, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Shree Holy Family Higher Secondary School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Single primary Source. No other significant online coverage available in independent sources. Rahmatula786 (talk) 15:46, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Nepal. Rahmatula786 (talk) 15:46, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:47, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not finding Significant coverage for the subject on a brief web search so far, alternatively can be draftified if new sources can be found.Lorraine Crane (talk) 18:21, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – robertsky (talk) 18:07, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Bhimdatta#Education as an ATD. मल्ल (talk) 15:35, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. – robertsky (talk) 12:39, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

प्रधान मंत्री

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

From what I can ascertain, I'm guessing this translates to "Prime Minister". It certainly isn't plausible that it means "of Nepal" and "of India" with the exact same spelling, which would make this an invalid dab page. Also, are article titles in different alphabets even allowed? I suspect not, but MOS:FOREIGNTITLE and WP:TSC don't explicitly cover this. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:15, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics, Disambiguations, Nepal, and India. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:37, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't speak Hindi, but google translate says this means 'Prime Minister'. Either way, it's frankly implausible for the term to be searched realistically. Translations of words in other languages are rarely even redirects, let alone DABs. jolielover♥talk 05:42, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: On English Wikipedia, there is no need to create a disambiguation page in Hindi language. B-Factor 16:10, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – The English Wikipedia should not have non-disambiguatatory, non-English index pages for English-language articles. Yue🌙 18:38, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - we routinely delete similar pages either in main space or draft articles. This is almost a speedy delete: non-controversial. Bearian (talk) 01:54, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The text just means prime minister and it doesn't really disambiguate them because they are under two different titles. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 15:39, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: in agreement with points above. As normally an english wikipedia user would not literally search for a non-english characters.Lorraine Crane (talk) 03:28, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with all above. Non-English pages are not allowed on English Wikipedia, and this article is absolutely not required here. An English version already exists under Prime Minister (disambiguation).Jitendra indulkar (talk) 08:14, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Nepal Proposed deletions

Pardeshi (via WP:PROD on 11 April 2025)
Zindagi Rocks (via WP:PROD on 11 April 2025)

Deletion review