Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Disability

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Shortcuts
Deletion Sorting
Project

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Disability. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
  1. Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
  2. You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Disability|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.
Removing a closed AfD discussion
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Disability. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
Further information
For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to People.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
Purge page cache watch

See also: Medicine-related deletions and Health and fitness-related deletions


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Star Mississippi 23:01, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Minimum Standards for Child Protection in Humanitarian Action

Minimum Standards for Child Protection in Humanitarian Action (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article appears to be original research that builds upon a non-notable, non-binding framework by an NGO working group. Many of the sources cited do not mention the Minimum Standards (for example, refs 11 and 16). voorts (talk/contributions) 00:51, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, this is not an NGO working group, rather this working group is composed of different international organisations, including UNICEF, UNHCR, IOM, IFRC, IRC and Save the Children. During humanitarian response, (e.g. Rohingya crisis), all the humanitarian crisis responding agencies, including national, international, and intergovernmental, follow these principles to ensure child protection and child safeguarding indeed. In terms of the references, the sources do not explicitly mention the standards at all, rather the sources are mentioned to explore the concepts, mentioned in the standards (e.g. reference 11 talks about justice for children and elaborates the necissity of Standard 14; reference 16 discusses about the protection of excluded childre ike children with disabilities and explains the gravity of Standard 18).
Wikipedia deletion policy WP:DEL-REASON (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Reasons_for_deletion) mentions 14 criteria and I believe this article does not meet the criteria for deletion. Janilin.bappi (talk) 04:53, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Point to a page number in sources 11 and 16 that mention the Minimum Standards. voorts (talk/contributions) 12:19, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
So, User:Janilin.bappi, you are arguing to Keep? Liz Read! Talk! 22:02, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. It's a brief of the minimum standard of CPHA, which is globally practised. I believe it deserves to stay. Janilin.bappi (talk) 09:56, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Janilin.bappi: what do you mean by "it's a brief"? Wikipedia articles are meant to summarize what secondary sources have to say about a particular topic (see WP:NOR and WP:SS. I couldn't find mention of the CPHA in most of the sources you cited. voorts (talk/contributions) 12:39, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In brief means a summary for your clarification. The references mentioned at the beginning of the relevant principles are provided for a deeper exploration of those issues. In the case of Standard 14 – Justice for Children, for example, related readings are not available on wiki yet. So, if readers want to explore the topic further, they can refer to the listed sources. Janilin.bappi (talk) 12:19, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:22, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. We have one unbolded Keep here in the discussion. A source analysis would be helpful to a future closer.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:12, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:31, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Neli Sabeva

Neli Sabeva (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:31, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/Disability&oldid=1290132030"