Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Controlisable
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 23:55, 28 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 23:55, 28 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete g3, blatant hoax ("Old Norse"), author blocked for vandalism. NawlinWiki (talk) 01:38, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Controlisable (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and it is not a web directory. Access Denied – talk to me 00:57, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. WP is also not for incorrect BS etymologies. Drmies (talk) 00:58, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per WP:DICDEF. Guoguo12--Talk-- 00:59, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per not a dictionary. (word has no ghits, does it even really exist?) OSbornarfcontributionatoration 01:01, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete DICTDEF, etc. Please prod next time or find a sympathetic admin to IAR delete in the spirit of WP:NOT. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 01:30, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 01:31, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- No, it doesn't exist, it's not from Old Norse, it's total BS--snow? speedy delete? any admins in the area? Drmies (talk) 01:32, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.