Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simone Torri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 11:14, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Simone Torri

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Self-)promotional article about a ~~thoroughly~~ utterly non-notable artist. The only verifiable "source" in the article, which isn't even close to being a reliable source, is a web site that describes itself as a site that "provides artists and photographers with sales and marketing tools to help simplify and accelerate their careers". A sort of Facebook for artists where they can write their own CV. Thomas.W ^talk 12:36, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The nom has said all that needs to be said Fiddle Faddle 12:43, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Might be notable as a tattoo artist. Xanthomelanoussprog (talk) 13:47, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. References demonstrating notability under either WP:GNG or WP:ARTIST do not seem to exist; the article in the local paper would be one, but we'd still need at least one more. Yngvadottir (talk) 15:31, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable. Kierzek (talk) 18:18, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Object to the word "thoroughly" in the nomination--I think I patented this as a modifier for "non-notable". ("Profoundly" too, though "utterly" is available.) Since I Englished some of the article I can't vote here, as an involved editor. Drmies (talk) 19:15, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Nonsense, of course you can vote, lots of editors work on the article during an AfD and still vote. You can't close the discussion. I think you know all this and you don't want to vote "delete" because you're utterly thoroughly inordinately completely and unequivocally proud of your Englishing.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:03, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, it's not a vote. Gotcha. Drmies (talk) 02:25, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per everyone above me - Promo bs that clearly belongs elsewhere. –Davey2010 • (talk) 23:00, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Hey. Davey2010. Mind your manners, pal: I Englished this shit. Drmies (talk) 02:25, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Drmies - Oh god I'm so sorry!, I take that back!, Had I known you had cleaned/rewrote it I obviously wouldn't of made that comment (That'll teach me for not checking the history!), Not sure why I made that comment since it's not promo, Jeez I feel awful now!, I'm so sorry, –Davey2010 • (talk) 02:38, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    - Much appreciated. I mean, a polished turd is still a turd, but it's, you know, polished. Shiny. Now, if you could squeeze out a "keep", that'd be great--I don't seem to have one in me. :) Drmies (talk) 02:51, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
      - Keep per Drmies's improvements and also passes GNG and ARTIST AND the fact I feel pretty awful right now!. –Davey2010 • (talk) 03:11, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
        Oh, for chrissake, Davey2010, don't you know when you're being joshed? I mean, if Drmies is constipated he can see a different kind of doctor. And if you too are joking, at least go back to delete now.--Bbb23 (talk) 04:51, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
        Dude I've had 3 hours sleep and havent been with it for the entire day!, Somehow I missed the fucking joke entirely! .... Now I do feel like a complete twat! –Davey2010 • (talk) 05:01, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
        There were more word plays per square letter in Drmies's comments than you can shake a log at. Apparently, he thinks this discussion is an extension of his talk page. Unfortunately, I often edit with only 3 hours sleep. I hate it. I'm so tired I'm afraid I'll block the wrong editor. Now go get some rest, and you'll feel better all around.--Bbb23 (talk) 05:20, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:PROMO WP:GNG. I had previously nominated for Speedy Delete but this was rejected. At that time the article was so poorly written that I thought it was nonsense. Now I think this is Speedy Delete A7, but an AfD delete is fine as well. --Jersey92 (talk) 03:03, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails notability. No significant coverage found in independent reliable sources. SmileBlueJay97 talk 03:15, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thoroughly delete... _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 11:40, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.