Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SOMOS Films
Appearance
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- SOMOS Films (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Blatant advert. Not even as "good" as WP:ADMASQ. Suffers from appalling WP:CITEKILL, which is broadly irrelevant since it is an advert anyway and should be deleted as such. Fails WP:NCORP I kmow I accepted this at AFC. I had hoped the community might improve it. The acceptance was borderline. It is unsual for me to AfD my own acceptasnces. Normally I remain neutral at AfD when I have acceopted a draft. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 16:58, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 16:58, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 16:58, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 16:58, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 16:58, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 16:58, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 16:58, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 16:58, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Advert is a content argument, not a notability one. If notable, then that just means the article needs to be rewritten to meet neutrality standards, not deleted. The deletion argument you're choosing seems to be WP:NCORP, but haven't really addressed the sourcing itself in regards to how it doesn't meet that. And there does seem to be sources available discussing the subject studio, such as this, this, this, and this within Spanish language sources. I'm not voting just yet, but I would like a proper deletion argument to be made first before I decide. SilverserenC 20:53, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- Stubify - Remove all after the lede paragraph. Wikipedia doesn't really have good procedures for dealing with advertising that gets into article space, and this AFD illustrates that problem, but further discussion of that problem belongs in a policy forum, and this is a content forum. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:40, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
- comment SOMOS Films is clearly an influential entity and one of the leading streaming platforms for Latin America. If things need to be rewritten to not seem like an advert, we can fix that. Does not call for deletion.