Wikidata:Requests for deletions

Requests for deletions

Items that do not meet Wikidata's notability policy can be deleted. Please nominate items for deletions on this page under the "Requests" section below. If it is obvious vandalism, just add the page here (gadget available), or ping an administrator to delete it. Contact can also be made with an administrator in #wikidata^connect.

Please use {{Q+}} the first time you mention an item. Unless you use the gadget, please also ping the item's creator in your request (or ping the bot operator, when appropriate) if the user is still active on Wikidata and the user has contributed the majority of information in that item.

Please use Wikidata:Properties for deletion if you want to nominate a property for deletion.

Duplicate items should be merged, not deleted: see Help:Merge.

Do not blank items in anticipation of deletion. In particular, do not remove sitelinks, even if you have requested the deletion of the page in the sitelink's target wiki or if you think that sitelinks of this type should not have Wikidata items.

This is not the place to request undeletion. Please read Wikidata:Guide to requests for undeletion and either contact the deleting admin or use Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard instead.

More information

Add a new request

Translate this header box!

On this page, old requests are archived, if they are marked with {{Deleted}}. An overview of all archives can be found at this page's archive index. The current archive is located at Wikidata:Requests for deletions/Archive/2025/06/25.

Requests for deletions

medium

_{~91 open requests for deletions.}

Pages tagged with {{Delete}}

User:MarciaValéria2025

if this list is out of date.

Requests

Please add a new request at the bottom of this section, using {{subst:Rfd |1=PAGENAME |2=REASON FOR DELETION }}.

Q66480449

Wikimedia surname disambiguation page (Q66480449): type of Wikimedia disambiguation page: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Old RFD (Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2020/01/21#Wikimedia_disambiguation_page_subclasses) ended due to "withdrawn". For me this surname disambiguation page seems to be existing because of solo project of svwiki sv:Kategori:Efternamnsförgreningssidor. Surnames are different from DAB stuff and shouldn't be messed with each other Estopedist1 (talk) 08:00, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:01, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Also courtesy ping for the creator: user:Moebeus--Estopedist1 (talk) 08:02, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

I appreciate the courtesy and won't be protesting your request:) Moebeus (talk) 12:38, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

I like having separate items that are (in most cases) conceptually distinct but I also see the disadvantages. I'd still slightly vote for keep. And what about Q22808320? As MisterSynergy wrote at the preceding RFD, "Whatever we do to Q22808320 should be done to those ones as well." (i.e. to Q66480449 and Q61996773). Adam78 (talk) 14:57, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Q132830176

Marcel Byttebier (Q132830176): Flemish Contractor: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non-notable person --DovaModaal (talk) 20:14, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:21, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Q2986550

Archives Commission (Q2986550): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I found no authoritative source within French government, historical or otherwise, mentioning a "Commission Des Archives" solely. Thadguidry (talk) 10:28, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

 Delete, there was an article on frwiki (fr:Commission des archives) but it was deleted in June 2020. Samoasambia ✎ 16:26, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

From en:Armand-Gaston Camus: "Camus is considered the founder of the Archives Nationales, as in 1789 he was appointed as archivist of its predecessor, the Commission des archives of the Assembly (Estates-General). He served in this role until his death." Also mentioned in https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/term/BIOG222677 and other sources. Peter James (talk) 18:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:17, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Q19816325

Bob Rosen (Q19816325): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Appears to ne non notable, no sitelinks, no properties nor identifiers other than the instance of and sex qualifiers. ToadetteEdit (talk) 10:47, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 10:51, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

IMDb identifier added. (t) Josve05a (c) 15:16, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Q107092313

pier (Q107092313): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not appear to be notable Quesotiotyo (talk) 22:49, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

I looked at this entry, and I thought "that feels like it's by Roger Nice Eyes", and indeed, it's by one of his socks.

That said, is "a specific pier in Ireland" a "clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references"? DS (talk) 03:51, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Surprisingly, this might actually be notable, if only marginally. This is known as Knockaphort Pier, and is the landing for ferries to Q1625333. It was the subject of a local news story in 2017 when a car rolled off the pier with a baby inside. Omphalographer (talk) 02:35, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Q63035132

Q63035132: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Completely unclear what this is; the statements variously suggest a character, a human, or a nonhuman (“female organism”); the place of birth actually points to a fictional work; the Behind The Voice Actors character ID (P5107) looks completely unrelated; the YouTube video ID (P1651)’s meaning is unclear TweetsFactsAndQueries (talk) 17:06, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:11, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

Apparently it’s linked from Q3790329 as characters (P674), along with the much more bare-bones item Q63035128. TweetsFactsAndQueries (talk) 18:50, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

Q111670040

AC4400CW (Q111670040): fictional diesel-electric locomotive from the 2009 video game Train Simulator: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This is a duplicate of Q1097466, and falsely claims that it is fictional locomotive in a train simulator game (it is a real locomotive). --4300streetcar (talk) 20:30, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:42, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

Q13485189

Euchrysops osoris (Q13485189): species of insect: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Obvious error: Euchrysops osiris (Q5406033) --Christian Pirkl (talk) 18:26, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

Both names have multiple distinct identifiers, so it's not super obvious. From a cursory search, osiris seems to have been the original spelling (as Lycaena osiris, Hopffer 1855; note there is also a junior homonym, Lycaena osiris Otto Bang-Haas, 1927). Basionyms and replacement names are generally kept as separate wikidata items, with linkages, but I'm not certain how typographic errors are best handled. -Animalparty (talk) 16:07, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

@Succu could you please have a look? Vojtěch Dostál (talk) 07:02, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Q60464321

Inception Automotive Detailing (Q60464321): company: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Does not appear to be notable; connected item Q60511355 may not be notable either despite a stub in arzwiki Jamie7687 (talk) 01:36, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 01:41, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Q133803652

Behnam Bagherzadeh-Rahmani (Q133803652): Researcher, lecturer and athlete: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

WD:N Arian (talk) 09:40, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Page was deleted on Farsi Wikipedia due to lack of notability. See fa:بهنام_باقرزاده_رحمانی and fa:بحث:بهنام_باقرزاده_رحمانی. — Chrisahn (talk) 14:18, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Probably meets notability based on authorship of Q129579401. William Graham (talk) 20:09, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Have you checked to see if he's the actual author? Trade (talk) 17:25, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

@Trade You should be able to check he's the same author by comparing articles listed on his website with those stored on PubMed, for example https://hamishefit.com/iron-dependent-programmed-cell-death-ferroptosis-aerobic-exercise-in-the-elderly/ and https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38306027/ Piecesofuk (talk) 17:48, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:11, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Q133256737

Rémi Morin (Q133256737): Search marketer strategist and dj producer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Trade (talk) 17:08, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Rémi Morin (Q133256737) Q133256737

Two Notable releases musics from musicbrainz database (source) added :

- Q133809613

- Q133809590

Will add the rest of musics releases after review. MisterTopical (talk) 19:15, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 05:51, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Q132239758

Oleksandr Tunyk (Q132239758): ukrainian marketer and tourism specialist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Trade (talk) 17:09, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 17:11, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

https://knute.edu.ua/blog/read/?pid=12299&uk Tunyk (talk) 18:48, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Wrong reply

Q89790727

Q89790727: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unsourced purely promotional item. Adamant1 (talk) 04:31, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:41, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

I unlinked it. Things were linked wrong anyway. Can someone delete it now? --Adamant1 (talk) 00:47, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Q133365244

Hirohiko Suzuki (Q133365244): Japanese businessowner (1981-): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, ja:Wikipedia‐ノート:削除依頼/鈴木博彦, for LTA promoting an individual that has been deleted in jawiki for many times. Aqurs1 (talk) 09:02, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:11, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

There's a sitelink to Wikiquote and thus meets WD:N. Needs to be deleted on jawikiquote first. Mbch331 (talk) 09:54, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Currently at rfd process in jawikiquote and I'm disscusing with local admin there, please place this as on hold. Aqurs1 (talk) 10:10, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

I didn't set {{Notdone}} on purpose. So the issue of the existing sitelink could be solved locally. Mbch331 (talk) 10:58, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Q133806489

Suzukoh Corporation (Q133806489): Japanese wholesale business: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, ja:Wikipedia‐ノート:削除依頼/鈴興, for LTA promoting a companmy that has been deleted in jawiki. Aqurs1 (talk) 09:04, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:11, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Has 1 incoming link from an item that currently meets WD:N. Mbch331 (talk) 09:55, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Q111470050

Shiksha (Q111470050): nonprofit organization from India: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Purely promotional item. The only thing it's referenced to is the Indian governments company database ID, which applies to every company in India. Adamant1 (talk) 18:26, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

There is literally no reference from the indian governments company database you mention. All references are from Q5615419. And this is not Wikipedia with promotional items, but Wikidata. So, "It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references." see Wikidata:Notability. Best NGOgo (WikiProject Nonprofits!) 19:22, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

@NGOgo: Fair enough. I thought Goldstar was a government database for some reason. Regardless, I don't think it confers notability anyway since it has no other inclusion criteria then something being a company. As you point out, the item has to be "described using serious and publicly available references" and the link is dead anyway. A single dead reference isn't "serious references." --Adamant1 (talk) 21:43, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

The link was not dead at the time of creation and the data is still valid. It can be used to create an overview of NGOs in India, i.e. here.

Why would you delete information like this? Unlike Wikipedia there's no overhead or maintenance work connected to it. NGOgo (WikiProject Nonprofits!) 10:25, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Contributions by Capsfiz

• Q133831821: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q133831774: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q133831735: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q133831706: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q133831699: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q133831658: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q133831649: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q133831452: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q133831236: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q133831106: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q133831074: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Q133831046: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Serdar Özen Organizasyon (Q133830730): Wedding organization company based in Turkey: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)
• Serdar Özen (Q133830244): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

non-notable, self promotion Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:45, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello,

I am the subject of some of these entries, and the creator of others. My name is Serdar Özen, a professional wedding organizer based in Turkey, with over 25 years of experience. I am the founder of Serdar Özen Organizasyon, which has organized many celebrity weddings covered in national media. Each wedding listed here has verifiable news coverage, and I am gradually adding references and interlinks.

I understand that some items may currently lack descriptions or external references. I am actively working to improve and complete the items with:

Descriptions in multiple languages

Reliable sources (national press, TV coverage, etc.)

Connections to existing Wikidata items

Please do not delete them prematurely — I kindly request time to finish updating them. I’m happy to provide additional verification if needed.

Thank you for your understanding,

Serdar Özen (Capsfiz) Capsfiz (talk) 02:47, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Q66828762

Robyn Ward (Q66828762): Businessperson from the United States: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This person is a paid speaker as a startup coach. The only independent sources I could find were podcasts she did <1k YouTube channels. I made this item years ago but now think it should be deleted. 1Veertje (talk) 10:42, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

@1Veertje I have no problem to delete this item, but it is used by Commons [1]. So she actually fulfil WD:N #3. Fralambert (talk) 21:57, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

Yes, I xreated this and the other items I nominated recently back in 2019 because I'd taken it upon myself to catalogue the photos of the The Next Web conference. The WD:N I had in my head expressly made Commons not one of the significant links that would make it not enough of a reason for the creation of an item here on Wikidata, which would make sense since there isn't much of a filter for who can be included there. I guess this woman is a bit of an edge case. She does try to get publicity, but so far, like I said, the interviews she's had were with small time YouTube channels, and speaking at this conference. I guess we can be favorable to her and keep it, I was going through all the items I made in 2019 that weren't also linked to WP because a fair few are of people that were entirely without any reporting. 1Veertje (talk) 11:33, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

 Delete Ok, it don't seem to be use as structural data, so ok for deletion. Fralambert (talk) 18:09, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

@Fralambert Commons categories confer notability per WD:N #2. This is surprising but generally a settled matter. --Emu (talk) 19:14, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

@Emu I don't agree with this but the use of structural data on Commons do give a structural need to the item. Fralambert (talk) 20:37, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Q64629306

Johan Schaap (Q64629306): Entrepreneur from the Netherlands: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The photo in this item says they won the "Next Web Award" 2007, but there isn't much to find about this person on the internet atm. I made this item ages ago, but now think there's not enough info for an item 1Veertje (talk) 12:10, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Q67202282

Vicenç Martí (Q67202282): Entrepreneur from Spain: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No independent sources, I shouldn't have made this item 1Veertje (talk) 13:25, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 13:31, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Q133802133

Heart Sutra. Narthang version. (Q133802133): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Ameisenigel (talk) 15:04, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 15:11, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

Q133865693

Q133865693: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Existe déjà Chirocca77 (talk) 17:34, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

It is probably different from Q11321186 -- that one is for the taxon, Q133865693 is for Caridina typus used as seafood. However, I do not mind if the items will be merged. --Wolverène (talk) 19:46, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Q62089827

Farhad Garashov (Q62089827): politician: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. All Wikipedia articles got deleted due COM:ADVERT. --Yousiphh (talk) 14:36, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:41, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

 Keep No evidence - nor even any attempt to make a case - that this is an advert. Appears to be a notable politician. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:43, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

He is not a politician. Not even a notable person. Yousiphh (talk) 07:00, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

There does appear to be some Azeri-language coverage via Google News... is it enough, I couldn't say (especially without translating it all). DS (talk) 17:39, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

'Coverage in the news' by Azerbaijani local media? Come on, this can't be the reason for this person's notability. Yousiphh (talk) 20:35, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

@Yousiphh Why would Azerbaijani local media not satisfy the requirements of WD:N #2? --Emu (talk) 13:19, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Q76230916

Mervyn Smith (Q76230916): Peerage person ID=622580: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable person, simple genealogy. --Сидик из ПТУ (talk) 16:18, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:21, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request of items created by User:XsLiDian

May not be "clearly identifiable conceptual or material entities that can be described using serious and publicly available references" (Wikidata:Notability). The misuse of subclass of (P279) makes Q133820253 a Q327333, a Q49848 and a Q1255828 at the same time, which is clearly wrong. dringsim 18:22, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

 Keep They are subclasses to create instances from. For example, for the document :File:湖南省通信管理局不予受理告知书 (2025年1月17日).pdf, I create 湖南省通信管理局不予受理告知书 (2025年1月17日) (document instance) from 湖南省通信管理局不予受理告知书 (subclass), which is subclass of other appropriate subclasses.

All subclasses I used for documents can be verifable with a legit document already uploaded to Commons, which can then be verified in-person with respective authorities (government, court etc). If you suspect I uploaded false documents, you have a chance to put me in jail, because forging them is forbidden by the criminal law of my residence. XsLiDian (talk) 18:41, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

See also the tree of the classes of Q133820253, which is currently messy. dringsim 05:03, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Q106147872

Mauro Rosero (Q106147872): Colombian Artist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unsourced purely promotional item for a non-notable person. Adamant1 (talk) 04:49, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:51, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

 Delete and Q110875025 and Q110998930 probably too. --Hannes Röst (talk) 20:29, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

Q133974956

Mass graves in Pryvitne (Q133974956): Mass graves of Soviet soldiers in Pryvitne (Swiniuchy): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Wikidata item Q133974956 has no claims. Please add some. --.taras-fedora-syn (talk) 19:00, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

@.taras-fedora-syn: Umm, that is an item you created. Currenly it doesn't pass notability. Samoasambia ✎ 19:23, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request regarding Goldsmith family

1. Q111303568 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q98158691 (delete | history | links | logs)
3. Q98157720 (delete | history | links | logs)
4. Q98156846 (delete | history | links | logs)
5. Q56615169 (delete | history | links | logs)
6. Q46975806 (delete | history | links | logs)
7. Q98155518 (delete | history | links | logs)
8. Q113712132 (delete | history | links | logs)
9. Q133974987 (delete | history | links | logs)
10. Q133973833 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 21:20, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

 Keep for example Q98155518 passes WDN3 as she was the wife of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerry_Goldsmith, the mother of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joel_Goldsmith and the sister of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Hennagin Piecesofuk (talk) 06:23, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Are you suggesting to keep all of these items? Because Q111303568 for example is herself not notable, as far as I can tell from the item, and has no parent, sibling, husband or children that is obviously notable. --Dorades (talk) 06:43, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

@Dorades Not necessarily, but I checked a few of the lower numbered items and they seem to pass WDN3 as they are the immediate family of Q235077. Not sure about Q111303568, probably borderline as there is no direct link to Q235077 only via her mother Q56615169 who would pass WDN3. I expect it's only worth considering the two most recently added items which possibly could by deleted. Piecesofuk (talk) 09:04, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

I'd like also to note that most of these items are completely unsourced, some have empty IMDB IDs and some have a Facebook profile which I doubt represent the persons in question (typical for the creator of these items). --Dorades (talk) 09:12, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

 Delete unless a reliable reference can be provided. --Hannes Röst (talk) 20:25, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

Q130546451

Incredibox - Sprunki (Q130546451): 2024 horror music video game developed by NyankoBfLol: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Clearly promotional material Chó Vàng Hài Hước (talk) 08:56, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:01, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

I do not think it is "promotional material" (AKA made for advertising). This item was created 7 months ago when the mod first started getting attention by millions of people online. As such, it was probably not made by the creator of the mod to promote their Scratch game. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 02:44, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Q118646171

Divine Mercy (Faustina Kowalska) (Q118646171): Catholic devotion: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Repeated item --Anjo-sozinho (talk) 07:50, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 5 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:01, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Either the difference with Divine Mercy (Q1095258) should be made clear or both items should be merged, not deleted. Additionally, I think the relation of both items with Mercy of God in Islam (Q126736897) could be improved. Pere prlpz (talk) 11:08, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Q116769117

Ashiq Nabi (Q116769117): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable person. --Yousiphh (talk) 21:57, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Q124007668

Alakbar Alakbarov (Q124007668): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable person. --Yousiphh (talk) 21:57, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request: Gulf of America

1. Q132215363 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q132215708 (delete | history | links | logs)
3. Q132215460 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB) They were specifically created to separate intentional redirects.

--LIrala (talk) 03:44, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Q119731130

Laura Grüb-Geschwindt (Q119731130): Latin American composer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Item for a composer that I’ve found referenced only in a single source, Q119730716. A user claiming to be the composer based on their username (@Lauragrub:) keeps changing the date of birth but has yet to provide a source or respond to messages. The date of birth may very well be wrong in that one source, and given that this composer doesn’t appear to have any other sources or identifiers regarding them, perhaps the best path forward is simply to delete this item. Gamaliel (talk) 13:29, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

It doesn't look like anyone's left any messages on her talk page. If someone is brand new (which this user apparently is), messages in edit summaries are not an optimal way to communicate with them. DS (talk) 15:50, 5 May 2025 (UTC)'

I have done so. This user has not responded to pings and messages from multiple editors, but they are going on Wikidata to alter the birthdate on a daily basis. It seems like they are unable or unwilling to communicate. Gamaliel (talk) 15:48, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

 Keep There are several other sources on Google Books. We certainly can’t delete the item on notability grounds. Although judging from Ancestry, the birth date given in the source seems to be correct, we might want to treat this as a potential WD:LP issue and remove the date of birth (P569). Except there isn’t really any real evidence that this might be a legitimate privacy issue. --Emu (talk) 17:33, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

Could you add those sources to the item please? I did an extensive search and was unable to find anything beyond the one book already cited that established notability. Gamaliel (talk) 19:01, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

Q131839048

Gulf of America (Q131839048): Wikimedia redirect: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, only redirects Ameisenigel (talk) 14:46, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 20:06, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

Q28970130

Elnur Elturk (Q28970130): journalist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. --Yousiphh (talk) 14:45, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

•  Keep, Why do you think it's not notable? There are five images listed under the category of the person on Commons. This one would be lost. זיו「Ziv」 • For love letters and other notes 02:52, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

  Too keep Wikidata for not notable person only because of the photos and the Category page in Wikimedia Commons? Are you serious? Yousiphh (talk) 18:42, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

 Keep Public figure with lots of media mentions. I added some references and profiles. Feel free to perform a Google Image Search and add more mentions: https://www.google.com/search?q=Elnur+Elturk&udm=2 FillTheGaps (talk) 07:39, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Q133934426

Shamim Hossen (Q133934426): Bangladeshi journalist and lyricist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable, cross-wiki spam, all sidelink pending delete. Aqurs1 (talk) 20:31, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

Q19724400

Budhi Achmadi (Q19724400): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I am proposing the deletion of this Wikidata item because I have changed the title to Q16201415 and it is a different person Badak Jawa (talk) 08:54, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello @Ymblanter, I ask for your help to delete the item because I have changed the title of the item to a completely different person because it does not meet the eligibility requirements for military figure articles on the Indonesian Wikipedia Badak Jawa (talk) 16:25, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

Q134530718

Circle Line (Milano) (Q134530718): planned suburban railway line in Milan: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No Circle Line in Milan exists. Sources come from an unrelyable website ★ → Airon 90 16:39, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:41, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

I do find something weird like it use a London underground logo as its logo...? But for me I prefer all sitelinks deleted at first. Stang^★ 06:40, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Please note, some IPs promote this item and he doesn't know how to use wikidata item or the difference between a railway line and a railway service (an example). Moliva (talk) 16:33, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

@Stang, Moliva: Plase see w:en:WP:LTA/ALS and both Milano and broader Lombardy WD items would need a systematic cleanup behind this vandal/hoaxer.--A09 (talk) 19:14, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

@A09: I cleaned up the most imaginative properties and statement of the item. In any case, the item is related to a planned railway service, but nowadays forecast is 2030 and there are few public resources to complete it. IMHO, I suggest to  Delete, but I don't know wikidata practice to keep planned item with little chance to be completed (now). Regards. Moliva (talk) 05:41, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

If it is or it has been actually planed - that is, included in official plans - it is notable. In fact, if it was included in official plants, it's likely it got some coverage from reliable sources. In the other hand, if it's just an idea promoted by some hobbist that has failed to reach coverage from reliable sources, it's not notable. Pere prlpz (talk) 10:48, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request: 10435 items created by User:Kiril Simeonovski

For example:

1. Q104411010 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q104411011 (delete | history | links | logs)
3. Q104411012 (delete | history | links | logs)
4. Q104411013 (delete | history | links | logs)
5. Q104411014 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable. SR5 (talk) 10:50, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

• created by @Kiril Simeonovski:

SELECT DISTINCT ?item WHERE {
  ?item wdt:P31 wd:Q51591359;
    wdt:P768 ?P768.
  ?P768 wdt:P17 wd:Q221.
  ?item rdfs:label ?label.
  FILTER((LANG(?label)) = "en")
  FILTER(CONTAINS(?label, "polling station no"))
}
GROUP BY ?item

Try it!

 Delete This is a silly level of detail for a country with half the population of Berlin. No references. Infrastruktur (talk) 08:17, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

 Keep These items document election results from two parliamentary elections (2014 and 2020) and one presidential election (2014). The ultimate goal is to use the data from the items in the “Politics” section across articles on settlements in the Macedonian Wikipedia so that readers get intormation on how the population voted in past elections (such information is already available in articles on settlements in the US). In the meantime, arrangements have been made with the State Electoral Commission (SEC) to obtain electoral results from the parliamentary elections in 2016 and 2024, the presidential elections in 2019 and 2024, the local elections in 2017 and 2021, and the referendum in 2018. I didn’t have enough time to create the items with the available data, but this is definitely something down the line. The collaboration with SEC will continue until we get data in spreadsheets for all missing elections before 2014, and they will, of course, be added on Wikidata. SR5 You should’ve contacted me with your concerns regarding these items before filing this deletion request. Infrastruktur I find your comment immediately above derogatory and offensive. I don’t care how many people live in Berlin, and it’s completely irrelevant for this discussion. As for the references, SEC is the data source (see here), and this can be easily added in all items.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 20:39, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

I realize there are no guidelines of what is appropriate level of details of data for a subject matter. The community at large is to blame for this shortsightedness, but you could still have asked for their opinion. More important is the claim raised by SR5 about notability, so let's look at it. No sitelinks, currently no references, no identifiers. What about structural need? Structurally these are leaf-nodes, so strictly no. No subscribed wikis, but you now mention plans to use it on the Macedonian wiki.

It's not like we haven't seen people add large datasets to Wikidata before. People have added tons of epidemiological data about Covid-19 for instance. That's one disease in one point of time covered in ridiculous detail. Imagine if we did this to every influenza, every mutation of the common flu. Of course it was well-intentioned, I don't doubt that at all. But that was at least in my opinion not a good fit for Wikidata. I guess the WMDE felt the same way as they made it possible to put tabular data on Commons and link to it from Wikidata.

This election data is per voting cycle and per polling station. If we compare to something that's natural to compare against like 2024 United States presidential election in Wyoming (Q116736257), the item doesn't even have voting results, but if we look at the english Wikipedia page, they have granularity down to the county level, which seems reasonable.

Would you be willing to either 1) make items for votes aggregated on a similar granularity to replace (!) the items for voting results per polling station or 2) if you're adamant about keeping this detail level, either store it as tabular data on Wikimedia Commons or store it as tabular data in module files or JSON files on the Macedonian wiki? Infrastruktur (talk) 21:54, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

The existence of those items is because Wikidata isn't ready to accommodate such level of granularity. I wish if all those data could be stored in the items on the polling stations by using qualifiers of different degrees (instead of creating Macedonian presidential election (2014) at polling station no 1078 (second round) (Q104404849) and Macedonian parliamentary election (2020) at polling station no 1078 (Q101872942), it'd be much more convenient to use a property on election as a qualifier of first agree and votes received (P1111) as a qualifier of second degree in Polling station no 1078 (Macedonia) (Q84838984)), but there are practical problems that the project's current infrastructure cannot solve.

I first encountered this problem when adding demographic data by ethnicities from historical Macedonian censuses in the items on settlements four years ago. Namely, adding population (P1082) and point in time (P585) as qualifiers of the same degree below each ethnicity yielded different number of values so that it was impossible to query the desired results. For instance, it was impossible to query the number of Serbs (Q127885) in Psača (Q3133689) because repetitive values aren't rendered so there were five values for population (P1082) and seven values for point in time (P585) (see here). So, an easy way to solve this was by creating sub-items about ethnicities across settlements (see Q99031103). I've advertised this problem to many people who are highly involved in Wikidata on multiple occasions, and the response has always been that the project would be improved to accommodate such requests. Unfortunately, it seems like no improvement has been made in this regard.

Your suggestion to use Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia to store these data isn't a solution. The fact that the items are redundant doesn't mean that the data they store aren't notable. Wikidata is a project aimed at storing open data from reliable sources, and government agencies that provide those data are certainly reliable. Moreover, one of the primary properties of wikis is that they provide almost unlimited storage space, so the size shouldn't be a problem at all. Wikidata abounds in items about people who aren't notable enough to have standalone Wikipedia articles, and Wikimedia Commons has millions of files that aren't used on any other Wikimedia project. Finally, such solutions of problems that Wikidata cannot solve are aimed at inspiring advancement of the project's current tools and infrastructure. All in all, I don't see how Wikidata would benefit from removing these data from the project.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:29, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

@Kiril Simeonovski: Unfortunately there haven't been any input from others in this thread. The only other issue here seems to be the lack of references for the data. I realize it might be difficult to provide a reference on data from the individual polling stations, but would it at least be possible to add some references that cover the aggregate results so that it can be verified that the numbers do in fact add up. Not sure where the best place to have those references are, but I guess 2014 Macedonian presidential election (Q15873287) is the best option. Assuming a couple of references are added to that item I will close the thread keeping the items. Infrastruktur (talk) 15:28, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Q124784747

Aki (Q124784747): 2017 short film by Taylor Reynolds: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability not demonstrated. Dorades (talk) 07:52, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Really? What's important here is the short film, not the person or organization involved. However, I've noticed something else. There are three (notable) people in the credits of the film: Dee Bradley Baker has appeared in various media, Soji Arai (Sohee Park) has appeared in a few media, and Kazumi Zatkin has appeared in two films. - THV | ♂ | U | T - 12:37, 2 June 2025 (UTC); edited: 15:35, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

WD:N doesn't distinguishs between film, persons or organisations, therefore also this short film must comply with this guideline. If notable people were involved here, it could comply with WD:N #3. --Dorades (talk) 21:46, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

It will happen soon. I added three, but the last one wasn't in the data. - THV | ♂ | U | T - 00:41, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Q134471974

あまくてたのしい♡AiScReamラジオ! (Q134471974): song by AiScReam: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This is not a musical work. Instead it's a radio drama, so it has no musical composition Stylez995 (talk) 16:24, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 16:31, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Q134619124

Small Projects with C (Q134619124): Open-source collection of academic C programming projects (2023): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs | discussion)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 16:35, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Q11977101

Q11977101: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unused, unsourced item for a non-notable record label. Adamant1 (talk) 07:35, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:41, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

I would agree, but there's a record released by the label, Careful Saint (Q11963106), which has a Swedish Wikipedia article. If the articles connected to that item and Wrath Passion (Q10720673) are deleted this would no longer be necessary, but as they do, it is better to have an item for this than create a separate property similar to author name string (P2093) for record labels that would make queries and templates more complex (there are good reasons for P2093, particularly the number of new items about living people that would be necessary, many of them duplicates, with almost no information). Peter James (talk) 15:05, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Q134711430

TUBITTUM – Journal of Scientific and Technology Research (Q134711430): peer-reviewed scientific journal published by Tubittum Academic Publishing: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable (predatory?) journal. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 13:06, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Keep

This journal is a peer-reviewed scientific publication with a valid ISSN (2822-5295), as listed on the official ISSN Portal:

https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/2822-5295

It is published by Tubittum Academic Publishing, which is an independent academic body affiliated with TITU International University (Turkey Branch).

The journal’s official website is: https://tubittumjournal.com

The journal publishes original research across multiple scientific and technological disciplines.

It adheres to academic publishing ethics and transparency standards.

There is no evidence that this journal is predatory. We kindly request to retain this item on Wikidata. Tubittumtr (talk) 09:19, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

@Tubittumtr. Any journal, including predatory ones, can claim to be a lot of things. Are there any references to show this journal's notability? I can't find anything reliable on this Tubittum or the university you mentioned. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 02:31, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

Keep 2

The journal TUBITTUM – Journal of Scientific and Technology Research is a registered, independent, and peer-reviewed academic journal with multiple indicators of reliability and notability:

1. Indexed in Google Scholar and visible with multiple articles:

View on Google Scholar

2. Registered ISSN (2822-5295) in the official ISSN portal:

ISSN Portal Entry

3. Listed in SJIF (Scientific Journal Impact Factor):

Journal Passport on SJIF

4. Featured in an academic interview with the editorial board published by eAkademija Nauka in 2023. (Reference available upon request)

5. Highlighted on BDU International’s official website:

Academic launch announcement by BDU

6. TUBITTUM receives regular coverage and endorsement from numerous national and regional news outlets.

Each issue’s release is covered by a wide range of independent media platforms and newspapers, demonstrating the journal's sustained presence in the academic and public discourse. Some examples include:

- Van Gazetesi – Archive of published issues

- Yerel Van Haber – Final issue release

- Tekturk Haber – Award coverage

- Mudanya Gazetesi – 73rd issue announcement

7. TUBITTUM is listed as a collaborating publication on the official website of TITU University:

TUBITTUM listed under institutional collaboration

These diverse and verifiable references confirm the journal’s legitimacy, academic visibility, and broad public engagement. The journal meets notability standards and its Wikidata item should be retained. Tubittumtr (talk) 08:02, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

Q131542196

stackable concrete block (Q131542196): architectural element, roadblock, wall: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notability not demonstrated. Dorades (talk) 17:12, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:41, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

said to be the same as (P460) claim on Nice stones (Q28058815), which seems similarly non-notable, despite it having an intentional sitelink to redirect (Q70894304) to dewiki. Tæppa (talk) 04:59, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

What about it seems non-notable? They seem like a clearly defined concept which has many mentions in reliable sources, which means they probably pass GNG by Wikidata standards.StarTrekker (talk) 21:09, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

The items presently don't read as being clearly identifiable. The English name "Nice stones" appears to have been coined by Wikimedia Commons. Tæppa (talk) 23:16, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

That's unfortunate but the English being 'original research' doesn't change that the original language version seems to exist as a concept.StarTrekker (talk) 10:54, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

I tend to agree that Nice stones (Q28058815) is notable since it is described in de.wp and also (at least) mentioned in some German news articles. If Nice stones (Q28058815) is a subclass of stackable concrete block (Q131542196), I would withdraw this RfD -- do we know if this assumption is correct? --Dorades (talk) 21:43, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Nice stones (Q28058815) reads as being a german alias / nickname of stackable concrete block (Q131542196) rather than being conceptually different. Tæppa (talk) 11:46, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

According to the Commons category and de.wp, it’s the other way around: stackable concrete block are a subclass of Nice stones since they also include things like commons:File:KFZ_-_Sperren_aus_Beton_-_Nizza_Sperre_-_Dresden.jpg. It’s doubtful however that this is the case off-wiki. --Emu (talk) 12:50, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request regarding Tech SEO Summit (2)

This request follows Ameisenigel's suggestion to "consider nominating them again together with the associated items" after a first RfD on some related items. In this previous RfD I nominated items related to Tech SEO Summit (Q127326900) in July 2024 (cf. Wikidata:Requests_for_deletions/Archive/2025/06/07#Bulk_deletion_request_regarding_Tech_SEO_Summit), most items were recently deleted, for two items I withdrew my request and six were not deleted. Following Ameisenigel's notice, this was partly because the RfD did not include all related items, which was the case because some were created after the RfD. Since I have a strong notion that Tech SEO Summit (Q127326900) was created for promotion, I am opening this second RfD. It includes the main event and its editions, several people associated with these events who don't seem notable and also podcasts and one book (not found in Worldcat) which are associated with the individuals listed in this RfD. This RfD includes only two items from the first RfD. I want to say sorry to the admins beforehand because this could be time-consuming to see through and there will probably be some reactions from involved users, so maybe also a lot of context to read through. Dorades (talk) 19:15, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

I still belive WDN2 and also WDN3 is fullfilled.

Regaring WDN2: The event is listed as a Google Search Central Live event (https://developers.google.com/search/events). Search Central Live is the official Google event series where you can meet members of the Google Search Team. For both Q132143582 and Q132143586, there are event recaps from participants and various social media posts.

Regarding WDN3: Q131400230 is a developer advocate at Google and attended Q132143586. Q127775949, for which you withdrew the deletion request after I pointed out the notability and importance of his talk, clearly participated in Q132143582. Q132143582 and Q132143586 also fullfill a structural need for other speakers not part of this deletion request.

Furthermore, I cannot understand at all why long running podcasts e.g. Q131827902 (1400+ episodes), Q124843502 (200+ episodes) and Q124843724 (150+ episodes) end up in this deletion request just because they are linked to people who have a connection here. The podcast hosts and all other guests are not up for deletion and therefore the podcasts should fullfill at least WDN3 as well. PodcastMage (talk) 16:10, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

https://developers.google.com/search/events contains also events they have "attended as guests". I don't think this confers notability to all these events. "event recaps from participants and various social media posts" also don't confer notability per se.

I withdrew my former RfD for Michael King (Q127775949) because there are some serious sources (borderline in my opinion) which make him notable. Not because he was speaker at the said event. We don't have to list all events he ever visited when these events are not notable by themselves.

Podcasts are, as any other items, not notable because they exist. It does not matter how long they run. They have to fulfill one of the criteria of WD:N. --Dorades (talk) 22:39, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Q134837715

official translation and native name divergence (Q134837715): term of the qualifier P1480: the official translation does not align with or diverges from the official native name: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

What purpose does this serve? Trade (talk) 20:43, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 23:51, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Q111262042

Abhishek Agarwal Arts (Q111262042): Indian film production company: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unsourced purely promotional item. Adamant1 (talk) 14:23, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:31, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Q54864396

Alistore European Research Institute (Q54864396): battery technology research institute based in Amiens, France: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unsourced purely promotional item for a non-notable organization. Adamant1 (talk) 15:25, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

2 External id's are provided, why are you claiming it is "unsourced"? ArthurPSmith (talk) 14:43, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

@ArthurPSmith: Per the notability guidelines an item is notable if it "refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity "that can be described using serious and publicly available references." What exactly makes am external ID "serious" and how they are being used as "references" for anything in the item? Literally all the ROR ID does is provide a link to their website, GRID ID, and Wikidata item. All of which is already in the item itself. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:02, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

ROR is the standard identifier for research organizations and is becoming widely adopted in research publications to identify affiliations. GRID was a predecessor with similar intentions, but it is a proprietary system owned by Digital Science and has been generally replaced by ROR. I'm pretty sure they both count as "serious"! ArthurPSmith (talk) 21:09, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Q64632915

Marie-Paule Dondelinger (Q64632915): Luxembourgish politician: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable Ameisenigel (talk) 19:39, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:41, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

@Ameisenigel seems to be WD:N #2 notable per [2], [3] and other media coverage and also #3 for Pirate Party Luxembourg (Q3079953)? --Emu (talk) 23:39, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Currently the item does not have any sources. The same applies to the statement in Q3079953. I am fine with keeping the item if sources are added. --Ameisenigel (talk) 15:06, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Q134448890

ALI D (Q134448890): Algerian rapper: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Selfpromotional Dr.üsenfieber (talk) 14:34, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:41, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Q134958540

V'ALI D (Q134958540): Album by ALI D: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Selfpromotion Dr.üsenfieber (talk) 14:35, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:41, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Q105617153

Soumitra Kumar Mallick (Q105617153): Indian econophysicist: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non notable --Zukku (talk) 02:10, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Q134710932

GusoPapi (Q134710932): American athlete and internet personality: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self-promotion. Also see en:User:Gusopapi. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 02:51, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Q134497122

GusoPapi (Q134497122): American athlete and internet personality (born 2007): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self-promotion. Also see en:User:Gusopapi. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 02:51, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request regarding Mayra Silva

1. Q134961923 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q134962420 (delete | history | links | logs)
3. Q134962245 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Mayra Silva (Q134961923) is a recreation of Q134725782; BlackBlockSheep (Q134962420) is a recreation of Q134885116; AI Citation SEO (Q134962245) is a recreation of Q134725734. Dorades (talk) 06:00, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Q109376016

Q109376016: Iranian singer، actor، martial arts champion and television host: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Clearly not meet WD:N. No link to any Wikimedia sister projects (English Wikipedia deleted). --1.47.153.165 09:03, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 4 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:11, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Q134884515

Benga Music (Brazil) (Q134884515): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

The article was deleted as it was entirely original research. Solidest (talk) 14:17, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 2 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 14:21, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

The article was deleted without having followed the entire Elimination flowchart and it is not true that it is based on original research. The expression "Benga Music" to refer to a genre of Brazilian music has been documented in several sources and references.Ricardosdag (talk) 03:01, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request: Items for deleted Wikispecies taxon pages

1. Q21229812 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q21229807 (delete | history | links | logs)
3. Q21224765 (delete | history | links | logs)
4. Q108068517 (delete | history | links | logs)
5. Q21217606 (delete | history | links | logs)
6. Q21228942 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

All items for deleted Wikispecies taxon pages I found when updating taxon pages under Eurypterida (sea scorpions); the first three items were for families or superfamilies of sea scorpions that as far as I can tell actually don't exist in the scientific literature, yet somehow had pages on Wikispecies since 2007 (possibly they may have been invented for Wikispecies, but this is a wild guess on my part and not provable), the latter three are misspellings of sea scorpion genera. (Also yes I'm aware that the first item is linked to by two other items; but these items are also in this list to be deleted so it doesn't really matter.) Monster Iestyn (talk) 18:39, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Q18473565

Discarica d'Inerti (Q18473565): human settlement in Italy: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This item seems to be based on an erroneous entry in GeoNames. Discarica d'Inerti is the generic Italian term for "dump for inert waste" (such as construction rubble), which would be a surprising name for a settlement. In fact, OpenStreetMap knows no such settlement, and no other source does. The bus stop just nearby is called Mesules/Mesoles/Mesole[4] (this is a tri-lingual area, hence it has three names), and the next house is an inn called Mesoles[5]. There are four Wikipedia articles connected to that item, they have similarly sparse content and references that lead to nowhere except GeoNames or sources based on GeoNames. The referenced Italian National Statistics Institute[6] knows no such settlement. Unless - surprisingly - anyone finds a solid reference for the existence of that place, this item should be deleted, and the 4 Wikipedia articles should be deleted as well. And, no, there is no waste dump around, I've been to that place 2 weeks ago. --Dealerofsalvation (talk) 19:09, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

The GeoNames entry was created by a user with the name "istat" - possibly representing the Italian National Statistics Institute as that is part of their URL. I couldn't find the statistics for anything smaller than a municipality but there are sitelinks so it is currently notable - the editors who created the articles may know the source. I could find https://ugeo.urbistat.com/AdminStat/it/it/demografia/eta/corvara-in-badia-corvara/21026/4 - I don't know if that is official or reliable but there seems to be no "Discarica d'Inerti" now although there is a "Zona Industriale" somewhere in the area (of course its status may be different from those included there, or things could have changed between 2011 and 2023). Q3257686 or possibly Q1134686 or Q15042037 would be more accurate than Q486972 for the P31. There are other items that are claimed to be settlements but are probably not, such as Q18473283. Peter James (talk) 00:57, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

So, is it Wikidata policy to keep items as long as Wikipedia articles refer to it, disregarding whether it's completely erroneous or nonexistent? And only after possibly the Wikipedia articles are deleted, the Wikidata item may be deleted? Just asking - I agree there is some sense in that. Dealerofsalvation (talk) 07:04, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

It is in the first criterion of Wikidata:Notability (and if this is deleted, it's likely that one or more new items will be created). In this case the subject is something that was used for statistical purposes (the "istat" account is in a list of national data providers: https://www.geonames.org/countries/IT/italy.html) so even if the articles are deleted there is a possible reason to keep this. The P31 can be changed to one of those I suggested (or to Q15893266 or Q67202850 if it no longer exists) There are also Q64728693 and Q28092864, but I don't think they are applicable here as a population has been reported from an apparently official source. Peter James (talk) 08:36, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

I won't "improve" anything about this item until someone provides a valid source that this item ever existed, be it just as a former temporary erroneous entry in an official database. In istat's current online database you don't find it, and I see no proof that the istat account really belongs to istat – and even if it does, does this absolve them from the obligation to provide a reference? Dealerofsalvation (talk) 12:37, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

It's an official account according to GeoNames. I couldn't find another source for the population, but there is https://www.istat.it/notizia/basi-territoriali-e-variabili-censuarie/ where it is included in "Sezioni di censimento" for 2011 with the code 2102630002 (Zona Industriale is also included, with the code 2102630001). From the 2021 data, the "3" means it's a "località produttiva". Zona Industriale is in the 2021 data, but not Discarica d'Inerti. Peter James (talk) 17:33, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

I browsed around on the page you linked, section "Sezioni di censimento ..." and in the linked pages therein, I could find neither "discarica" nor "2102630002". Could you be more specific where to find it? Dealerofsalvation (talk) 05:53, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Q115363766

The Impact of Digital Marketing Communication on Consumer Purchase Decision Among Youths in Cameroon (Q115363766): scientific article published in 2021: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Inaccessible article published in a predatory journal. Dorades (talk) 22:16, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Possibly predatory journal. Inaccessible just means the site is currently down. There is https://web.archive.org/web/20250000000000*/https://www.ijser.org/onlineResearchPaperViewer.aspx?The-Impact-Of-Digital-Marketing-Communication-On-Consumer-Purchase-Decision-Among-Youths-In-Cameroon.pdf but there are no links from other items, or identifiers other than DOI, and I don't think that everything that is published in a journal and has a DOI is notable. Peter James (talk) 00:00, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the comment; I've waited a few days with this RfD after I noticed that the URL doesn't work -- I don't expect this website to come available soon again. I think more important is that this journal is not to be considered serious as there doesn't seem to be a peer-reviewing process or other ways of editorial selection involved. --Dorades (talk) 21:26, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Q130984657

Brasilera (Q130984657): Brazilian celebrity content agency: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 08:28, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 08:31, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Q123537442

Kritischer Test-Journalismus (Q123537442): Satirical gloss on how journalists, influencers and co. work when they write articles, reviews and test reports, 1992: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 09:03, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 09:11, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Q134963417

Minecraft subject (Q134963417): something about Minecraft: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This item is way too broad and vague to be useful Trade (talk) 22:36, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:41, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Seems like a fair assessment, @BartoszKonkol care to weigh in? --Emu (talk) 23:14, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

 Oppose @Trade, Emu: 'Minecraft subject' is not vague, but is the highest item (in principle mainly as 'subclass of', but can also be as 'instance of') for items related to the Minecraft game, which allows them to be easily treated collectively (which can then be used, for example, in form of class to constraint properties by subject, i.e. 'property constraint' - 'subject type constraint' - 'class'), there are more similar categories of a higher item ('Minecraft game', 'Minecraft item', 'Minecraft mod', etc., which lacked appropriate the highest item, so 'Minecraft subject' became this), while its correctly broad is result of its useful, so its deletion is unjustified - at the same time, user Trade removed elements from at least one of properties using the 'Minecraft subject' item, without any justification, which together with this request for deletion, leaves me slightly consternation - regards! BartoszKonkol (talk) 23:52, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

That’s … not really how Wikidata modeling works, at least as far as I know. --Emu (talk) 00:06, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

I may be missing something in this matter because I am less experienced in WikiData (I have a little over ‰ of your total edits), but such modeling of item order that I presented seems quite logical to me, and in addition, it is not rare (being (Q24229398) for individual (Q795052), or never changes (Q23611288) for unique identifier (Q6545185) through persistent identifier (Q420330), etc.) ~ BartoszKonkol (talk) 00:54, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

I removed them because you kept adding nonsensical statements that were never supposed to be used on identifiers in the first place. Take P180 for example. An identifier is neither an "image, literarily described in a work, or otherwise incorporated into an audiovisual or other medium"--Trade (talk) 04:55, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

That issue regarding P13597 is a digression, but since you replied to it only, I will respond thoroughly, even though it does not really apply to this request for deletion. After more thorough analysis of P180, I have to agree in this respect. This statement was used by me by mistake because I misunderstood it. I have therefore already removed the use of P180 from P13597. I have also corrected the description in Polish for P180, because its previous wording could have implied a completely different interpretation. After edit 845730429, the description was "place, person, or other element presented in content of entity" (translating it). I understood this as corresponding to an indication of an entity in which an element appears. In other words, that individual articles from P13597 are within collective Polish Minecraft Wiki (Q133943531), i.e., as if they were depicted therein. If any other statement was accidentally entered by me incorrectly, please also indicate it to me specifically. I will remember in the future that such nuances and old translations can result in mistakes. Regardless, I do not understand other actions you take, such as today's transfer of video game mod (Q111369260) to video game mod (Q865493). The problem I see is not only that you are adapting these items to each other in a rather chaotic way. You are removing some aliases and leaving others, which creates a rather inconsistent and jagged result. You are stripping the item of its valuable statements in order to regress it to video game mod (Q865493). In this way, you are even breaking Wiki link and creating chaos without considering the consequences of these changes for other elements. Not to mention various statements about Minecraft currently contained in the overly broad area of video game mod (Q865493) and therefore now wrongly including modifications for other games. In addition, you are acting against consensus, as you have previously submitted a request for deletion about video game mod (Q111369260), requesting use of video game mod (Q865493) directly. This was rejected (not deleted) due to an established concept of separating Minecraft modifications from all other modifications, using video game mod (Q111369260) for this purpose. This request is available in these archives. Thus, you are acting in this matter arbitrarily and against the consensus of the community. Please explain what the purpose of this is and indicate different updated positions of the community. Otherwise, it seems to me appropriate for you to restore video game mod (Q111369260) and video game mod (Q865493), as well as other similar items that you have generalized in such a way, potentially damaging them, which no one seems to have noticed before, i.e., modder (Q117461124). I believe that such drastic changes should be preceded by discussion, although, as I have already specified above, in the case of video game mod (Q111369260), the matter is probably clear. Best regards! BartoszKonkol (talk) 08:06, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Many of the items linking to the game were already covered by our current modeling just fine. We don't need an endless amount of arbitrary P31 items whose only difference between the item they are based on is to have the name "Minecraft" in the label at the front and somewhere in the description. This is just excessive granularity for the sake of granularity. This is no different than removing the Q5 from Q266224 and replacing it with a new item called "human associated with Minecraft" Trade (talk) 08:29, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Issues raised in your response do not, unfortunately, solve problems I have signaled. And the comparison cited is not very accurate, if only because children from human (Q5) should not be determined by any one superior item alone, so human (Q5) is already the item of the highest order. But just as human (Q5) is part of group or class of living things (Q21871294), video game mod (Q111369260) (i.e., modifications to the Minecraft game) can be considered the completely separate part of video game mod (Q865493) (i.e., all modifications for various games). However, above all in my opinion, level of insight should not be determined by subjective preferences, whether one prefers granularity or conciseness, but by issues dictated by emerging needs and previous use. In other words, Minecraft subject (Q134963417) is necessary for example because of property constraints and video game mod (Q111369260) is justified because its use is well established and standardized. At the same time, the fact that you will cover items with some new current modeling will not serve anyone if you strip these items of their valuable statements. Same thing if you do not thoroughly and completely repair potential damage in other related elements. I see such current destruction of items as making a mess and showing a lack of respect for the work of other users. It is easy and quick to remove seemingly random elements (items, statements, qualifiers, labels, etc.), but it takes much longer to prepare these elements and introduce changes in a way that does not destabilize other elements. So I would ask you again to repair damage and connections, including recreating removed statements and also not to ignore alerts about violated property constraints, as well as to resolve defects in related elements that have arisen as the consequence of your changes introduced. Regards, BartoszKonkol (talk) 10:27, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

This conversation is bit difficult to parse to be honest, I read through and I’m really not sure what your points are BartoszKonkol. Some thoughts:

• Regarding Q111369260 (delreq): regardless of whether it should have been kept (because it’s notable in itself, which I am unconvinced of, that Minecraft modding (Q22906953) is a thing [which I don’t doubt] does not necessarily justify a “Minecraft mod” item) − it does not follow that it should be used as P31 (we have woman (Q467), and we do not use it as P31)
• Constraints are a means to an end, they cannot be used to justify modeling (it’s the other way around: constraints enforce good modeling ; we do not make bad modeling in order to make convenient constraints).
• I do not see the point of Minecraft item (Q134932436) − I don’t see what is lacking with ender pearl (Q106563700)instance of (P31)fictional object (Q15706911) + present in work (P1441) / from narrative universe (P1080). There is, unfortunately, some precedent for the kind of modeling you are trying to introduce with things like entity from The Legend of Zelda (Q29585394) or creature in Harry Potter (Q110660), but that will be dealt with one day.

Overall, on Wikidata, we do not subclass a lot − and definitely not for creative works (domain which I know the most) − we do not create classes like “Painting by Picasso”, “Song by The Beatles”, “Movie by Spielberg” etc etc. We use a narrow set of fairly high-level P31s and we use other properties to establish the relationship to Picasso, The Beatles etc. Jean-Fred (talk) 16:36, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Q12414950

Adi Badri temples (Q12414950): group of 16 Hindu temples from 6th to 12th century in Uttarakhand, India: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q116006738 चाहर धर्मेंद्र (talk) 13:30, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Q12414950 is about temples, so I merged it with Q123945880. Q116006738 is a tehsil; I merged that item with Q123259999. Peter James (talk) 17:47, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Bulk deletion request regarding HUB Catalyst Inc.

1. Q134978506 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q134979017 (delete | history | links | logs)
3. Q134978850 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 18:43, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Q123693647

In the Glovebox (Q123693647): French audio podcast on automotive stories (2020–): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 22:10, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:10, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Q79393271

C'est compliqué (Q79393271): French podcast: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 22:10, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 07:31, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Q105424591

21 Millions - Capital (Q105424591): podcast: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 22:10, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 11:40, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Q123555554

Endlich? Freie Bahn für Fraktursatz (Q123555554): Practical article on optical character recognition (OCR), 1996: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 22:21, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Q135006561

Puffin Parcel Post (Q135006561): An indie roguelike cozy strategy video game.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Regards Kirilloparma (talk) 01:09, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Q134963467

Minecraft game (Q134963467): a video game from the Minecraft series: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

This is completely redundant and bad modeling. Use Q7889 instead Trade (talk) 04:14, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 10+ others. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:20, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

 Oppose Similarly to Q134963417. Regards, BartoszKonkol (talk) 19:36, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

• Your thoughts? @Jean-Frédéric:--Trade (talk) 14:26, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

  I agree with @Trade:. This is not how we model video games on Wikidata. We do not subclass Q7889 for potentially thousands of series/franchises/etc. − for example we do not have P31=Mario game, Final Fantasy game, etc etc. Please use -instance of (P31)Toulouse (Q7880), together with any or all of -media franchise (P8345)Minecraft (Q25445348), -takes place in fictional universe (P1434)Minecraft universe (Q26945014), -part of the series (P179)Minecraft (Q112863331) (depending on the case), but we do not subclass Q7889, ever. (there might be some some borderline stuff like Star Trek video game (Q78444225) or the Pokemon games, but it’s just that we have not gotten around eradicating them just yet). Jean-Fred (talk) 16:07, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Q6540799

Q6540799: Wikimedia disambiguation page: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unnecessary duplication, see: Q9068543 --Alrael (talk) 08:56, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Duplicates don't need to be deleted, they can be merged by anyone, including you! See Help:Merge. -wd-Ryan (Talk/Edits) 01:41, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Ah, I did not know that. Thank you for that information! Alrael (talk) 06:10, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

@Alrael: go to Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets and add the first gadget "Merge". after this you will have a merge possibility in tools. - yona b (talk) 07:16, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Q1247071

Q1247071: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Unnecessary duplication, see: Q9068543 --Alrael (talk) 08:57, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Duplicates don't need to be deleted, they can be merged by anyone, including you! See Help:Merge. -wd-Ryan (Talk/Edits) 01:41, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Q58439001

Brammer (Q58439001): business in the United Kingdom: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 19:40, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:40, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Q58065090

Minetti (Q58065090): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 19:41, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:50, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

not sure. maybe it pass the structure criteria as child organization/unit (P355) of Rubix (Q56706731) - yona b (talk) 07:01, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Q113564281

Rana Tariq Mehmood Harnah (Q113564281): Pakistani Politician: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. The reference for member of political party (P102) is apparently for his father. Dorades (talk) 22:30, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 22:40, 23 June 2025 (UTC)

Q134992655, Q134993694, Q134993484, Q134993295

Monty (Q134992655): Music Producer & Graphics Designer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Manjot Kaur Sachdeva (Q134993694): Indian working woman and sister of musician Monty (Manpreet Singh Sachdeva): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Taranjeet Kaur Sachdeva (Q134993484): Housewife and mother of musician Monty (Manpreet Singh Sachdeva): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Tajendra Singh Sachdeva (Q134993295): Indian businessman and father of musician Monty (Manpreet Singh Sachdeva): (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Harleen Singh Sachdeva (Q134993969): Indian working professional and husband of Manjot Kaur Sachdeva: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Trade (talk) 04:25, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 3 others. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:32, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

i merged 4 requests. they are all relate. for my point of view, it seen as not notable. - yona b (talk) 06:51, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

•  Delete all. I added one more to the list above. This appears to be a w:en:WP:Walled garden of self-promotional items, all representing non-notable individuals, all created by the same editor. Marbletan (talk) 14:45, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Q134993969

Harleen Singh Sachdeva (Q134993969): Indian working professional and husband of Manjot Kaur Sachdeva: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Non notable Trade (talk) 04:25, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 04:32, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Q10535708

Q10535708: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Same as Q309250. See summary [7] and [8]

Q135060172

Q135060172: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Advertisement or spam. Posted by bot on the request of Well very well. --Железный капут (talk) 12:04, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Q132349011

DJ SEV3N (Q132349011): Polish producer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Out of scope, promo, unrelevant male man, unlinked, unused GiovanniPen (talk) 13:12, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Q123982575

Q123982575: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Notable? Herzi Pinki (talk) 14:11, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Q135033883

Q135033883: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item. Marbletan (talk) 14:34, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Q135033888

Q135033888: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Empty item. Marbletan (talk) 14:34, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Q135025124

Mr Treasure (Q135025124): my name is treasure olayinka I leave in ikirun native of Ilorin I'm 21years old i was born on 26 of January: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self-promotion of non-notable individual. Marbletan (talk) 14:35, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Q135025056

Mr Treasure bash (Q135025056): im me and i wll nevr be you: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Self-promotion of non-notable individual. Marbletan (talk) 14:35, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

[[9]]

HTTPS://WWW.WIKIDATA.ORG/WIKI/Q135067362: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Duplicate Tami GF (talk) 15:04, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Q134986451

Tek Emanuel (Q134986451): American rapper: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 19:06, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Q134511588

Brownstone Law (Q134511588): US law firm: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 19:10, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Q134481718

Robert L. Sirianni, Jr. (Q134481718): US lawyer: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 19:16, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 19:20, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Q123725395

Q123725395: no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Nonsense Wutsje 19:18, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Q110262503

Graphic Design (Q110262503): Stack Exchange site for Graphic Design professionals, students, and enthusiasts: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Dorades (talk) 19:21, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Q134562025

Wikipedia:WikiFox (Q134562025): Wikimedia project page: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

I don’t think this is a valid item. The enwiki sitelink is a humorous soft redirect to User:TheresNoTime; the idwiki sitelink is a humorous essay about a kind of editor, whose userbox is seemingly only used by one user (who also created this item). Neither would be individually notable for a Wikidata item (I think); the only connection between them is that both are called “fox” in the local language, but Wikidata items should be about concepts, not words. Lucas Werkmeister (talk) 19:36, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Q135042937

Medhansh Seth (Q135042937): Indian teenage entrepreneur, author, and Rubik’s Cube champion: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

No strong indication of notability; also AceCubing (Q135043886) Bovlb (talk) 20:54, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

On hold This item is linked from 1 other. --DeltaBot (talk) 21:01, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Q135064055

Ingrīda Grass (Q135064055): no description: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Created by mistake Sabelöga (talk) 21:07, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Q135067669

FLO Business Solutions (Q135067669): FLO Business Solutions is a local business that provides POS services for a range of retail businesses, as well as other B2B services such as marketing and creative services.: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Advertisement or spam. Posted by bot on the request of Well very well. --Железный капут (talk) 21:35, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Haddag Holdings, etc

1. Q135012506 (delete | history | links | logs)
2. Q135011585 (delete | history | links | logs) (all on TAB)

Holdings company and a company it holds. No sitelinks or references for either - I can't even find a company web site, just a recently created Facebook page. Omphalographer (talk) 23:48, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Q135070360

Brookhaven RP (Q135070360): Video game from 2020: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Regards Kirilloparma (talk) 02:22, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

Q135069286

The Garfield and Dr. Seuss, Sonic Generations, The ZhuZhus’ Cindy-Lou Who and Frankie Show (Q135069286): French animated television series and 1966 American animated television special based on the book by Dr. Seuss, 2011, animated children's television series: (delete | history | links | entity usage | logs)

Not notable. Regards Kirilloparma (talk) 02:22, 25 June 2025 (UTC)