Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/In closing

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


see Template:Bolivian Primera División ... this one seems redundant Vlz.matthew (talk) 22:04, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

there is a section with all the seasons in the template; in this template:

there is no section for seasons. So I guess the right move would be to remove the seasons from the first template i mentioned, and then move them to this template:

Also want to note that the template above needs updating, stops at 2015-16.

There should be separate templates, as per the Ligue 1 example. GiantSnowman 18:21, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
clarify what you mean please?? Vlz.matthew (talk) 22:15, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
clarify what you think should be done Vlz.matthew (talk) 22:15, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:49, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No documentation. This template was created in 2018 and does not appear to have been adopted. I tried to make it work, but it did not propose adding any text to my common.js file (which is currently blank). This looks like an abandoned experiment. Delete from pages where it is transcluded, since it does not work. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:34, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:43, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or categories. Created in 2017. It pulls almost nothing from Wikidata. This looks like an abandoned test. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:31, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:42, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This is a proposed template that was rejected by consensus. See the template's talk page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:29, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:42, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox containing no links. Linked articles have been deleted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:27, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:41, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, categories, or incoming links to explain why it was created. The template appears to make a legal claim, which is probably not advisable. I read the explanation given by the template five times but emerged no clearer on what it is supposed to mean or how it is supposed to be used. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:27, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Judging by their contributions, I think the precision of the creator's English-language writing is a little bit lower than would be ideal, and so their intent is unclear. That's unfortunately substandard for a template describing a potentially complex situation, and it's better to delete it and let them flesh out the issue in discussion at WT:CSD. I speculate that the creator is concerned with people or stock photo agencies claiming copyright over free media (see their creation {{False copyright}}), thus forcing English Wikipedia down the road of tagging it as fair use instead of free. I think their ultimate goal is to get those files deleted from here, and uploaded to Commons instead. If I understand what they're going for, this template seems a little redundant to CSD F7c or F8 (depending on whether the free replacement is similar or identical). TheFeds 19:01, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Vestrian24Bio 09:22, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom --Lenticel (talk) 01:25, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete because F7 is likely not applicable in this way, and it is misleading to say so. Techie3 (talk) 01:05, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:37, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:39, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. No incoming links that explain why it was created. Created in 2021. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:23, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:38, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:TFD#REASONS 2. I made this module to be used on the {{R from domain name}} template, but I've since created a better module: {{#invoke:Domain handler}}. It does the same job and more, such as detecting top-level domains. This old module isn't used anywhere now, so it's no longer needed. If someone finds a good reason to keep it or a place where it can be used, I'll be happy to withdraw this nomination. Xoontor (talk) 10:07, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Dpleibovitz (talk) 03:00, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.