Wikipedia:Requests for checkusership/Eptalon

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful permissions request. Please do not modify it.

Eptalon (checkuser)

Eptalon (talk · contribs)

Based on the same discussion(link as given at Tygrrrs request, The admin noticeboard), I would also like to nominate myself for a CheckUser. Again, this is done to give people a choice. If they then feel that one of the candidates does not meet their expectations, not supporting that candidate will hopefully leave us with two people to award CheckUsership to.

As this is a self-nomination, there will be no candidate acceptance section. You will also not see me vote in this request.--Eptalon 21:55, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support

--M7 22:04, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Archer7 - talk 06:18, 19 September 2007 (UTC) I believe that Eptalon certainly has the technical ability to use the tool effectively, and of course trust is not an issue.[reply]
-- Creol(talk) 07:40, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Surely - Huji ^reply 12:37, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
sure --vector ^_^ (talk) 13:58, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- He used big words and formulae in his answer to Majorly, that has to mean he has experience :P Gwib^-(talk)- 16:23, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
--Werdan7^{T @} 17:26, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Majorly (talk) 19:39, 19 September 2007 (UTC) But as per M7, I'd like you to volunteer to have your access removed should you become inactive/not use your rights. Regards, and good luck![reply]
Absolutely! Phaedriel - 23:48, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I said this for creole too. I support this user because M7, Majorly, and Phaedriel are users that I trust. I believe this user will work hard to be a good checkuser for the Simple wikipedia. I hope you choose to count my support. ++Lar: t/c 13:43, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Decisions ,Decisions ;) ..--Comet styles 13:55, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
· Tygrrr^·talk· 13:59, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
--Cethegus 19:40, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
FrancoGG ^{( talk )} 20:37, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Maxim 22:52, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Kyoko 00:27, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
...Aurora... 10:06, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
--Yegoyan 21:24, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Alison ^❤ 04:39, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
--Support. Always helpful.Hikitsurisan 10:21, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
-- Let him protect this wiki. aflm (talk) 13:13, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support extremely trustworthy. Jordan - talk 16:35, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
---barliner--talk--contribs- 21:26, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
While I'm not too familiar with Eptalon, users with whom I am familiar and who I trust (and who I supported as checkuserers) support xem, and no one opposes, so I, too, give my support. WODUP 05:08, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oysterguitarist 15:38, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

Comments

Eptalon is now promoted to checkuser status. --§ Snake311 _{(T + C)} ^RFA 18:57, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, he isn't. Majorly (talk) 23:51, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now he is.--Werdan7^{T @} 14:56, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Do you think you have sufficient knowledge of IP addresses, proxies etc to be able to fulfil this role well? Majorly (talk) 00:14, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have a degree in Computer Science (as a major). Computer networks were one of my specialisations. So yes, I think I have the required knowledge regarding Classless Interdomain Routing (CIDR), (IPv4) netmasks, and the like. I might have to read up a little on IPv6, but I do not think Ipv6 is in widespread use (except perhaps Japan, which changed to it). --Eptalon 07:19, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eptalon, I'm pretty certain you have the requirements; you may need to study more about XFF too, in the mean time. - Huji ^reply 17:12, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.