Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Archive2

Add links
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Inherendo & Kent State vandal

This user's changes are very similar to edits made by our "Kent State vandal" (IP range 131.123.0.0/16). Distinguishing features are quotes from Scrubs, South Park, Adam Sandler movies as well as making edits regarding general dissatisfaction with the United States economy and president. · Tygrrr... 20:37, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I checked and replied to the AN converstion before seeing this request. Inherendo is the registered user on that range. -- Creol(talk) 03:10, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

JoshuaEdit

All sockpuppets focused on vandalizing, I'd like to know if there are anymore account and what range there coming from, and to have them blocked. Oysterguitarist 20:35, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done All three connect through Ameritech (DSL); the first two are related, the third is not. --Eptalon (talk) 20:44, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

JoshuaEdit4

Is this vandal part of the group? --Gwib -(talk)- 12:49, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done No, they aren't. --Eptalon (talk) 13:03, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LB22 and Benniguy

Questions to usertalk page have the same style "Why" etc , not sectionhead. Design style in creating wikipedia:adoption. (Now User:LB22/adoption). --Bärliner 18:27, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I am sorry I have to decieve you, but these two users are not the same; they do not even operate from the same network range. --Eptalon (talk) 20:10, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Poopmaster and Colonel

All three have been vandalizing a lot recently. They all seemed to have started at the same time. I would like to request a checkuser on them. Razorflame 19:39, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do not believe one is needed. They refer to each other in edits so are obviously linked. Colonel blocked 24 hours, vandalism. The other two indef. as unnacceptable usenames. --Bärliner 19:42, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
All right. I thought that this was serious enough to warrant a CU, so I posted it.

Please disregard this notice. Thanks. Razorflame 19:43, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Benniguy and Inkpen2

Me being paranoid, but this user asks far to many questions of which he already knows the answer to. He can revert vandalism yet he thinks a welcome message is "a pretty picture"? --Gwib -(talk)- 22:33, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would have to agree here. He even knew where the requests for checkuser, and the AN were. Suspicious. Razorflame 23:01, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What exactly is this? Inkpen2 (talk) 23:07, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Confirmed and blocked. Account was set up from an IP outside his range and then used to edit through the soft block. The IP range used to create the account has now been soft blocked as well. -- Creol(talk) 23:59, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Freddy

194.95.143.150 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) Freddy (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

I would like to request a checkuser for this, as this IP address has been displaying the type of stalking that would be like the type of stalking that Freddy would've done in the past. This IP has been focussed on the same user for over 4 months now, and I believe that it justifies a checkuser in this instance. Razorflame 20:53, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think a CU is really needed here. If anything, it looks like Kay Korner removing stuff from his/her own pages. Doesn't seem anything like Freddy to me. · Tygrrr... 21:46, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It is Kay Körner at the Dresden Universities--Bärliner 21:50, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not Freddy, please check into things more before requesting checkuser. Oysterguitarist 22:50, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alright. I didn't know that at the time, and his actions were suspicious.

Please disregard this request.

Thank you Razorflame 23:02, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Runningblader

I think that this newbie account is possibly Benninguy. He stole Razorflame's sig and copied Gwib's user page; one admin and one user Benninguy has talked a lot with before his ban. Otherwise it could be purely concidencial. --§ Snake311 (T + C) 23:37, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Nope, this is not benniguy; IP is completely different. --Eptalon (talk) 01:56, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Benniguy

I believe that these two IP addresses are possible IP's that Benniguy could be using. It was very subtle, but I believe that I was able to correctly pick up on it. Razorflame 16:31, 25 January 2008 (UTC) added IP. --Bärliner 18:05, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This needs to be done now. Sorry for sounding impatient, but this has begun to get serious. Razorflame 18:26, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note A quick IP WHOIS shows the top one to be from Poland and the second to be Sweden! Whitstable 18:29, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's possible I'm afraid. Not sure whether this CU is strictly necessary though. Archer7 - talk 18:32, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
WHOIS is more than clear enough on these IPs that a CU is not needed to identify anything here. two random IPs and three in Benniguys range (though he apparently never got that low on .242 and .13 or the range blocks would have been set for those as well. 243 is part of the same range, but he had only had 1 IP in that range out of a hundred so the range was not shut down with the rest.) -- Creol(talk) 18:41, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done A second checkuser: none of the IPs match the ones Benniguy used while logged in. --Eptalon (talk) 19:12, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Urmom201

Abusing multiple accounts. The first thing this user did when it logs on was start creating lots of accounts. Twathead was already indef blocked for unacceptable username. Needs confirmation. Razorflame 19:51, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pantomime102 was added because of similarities to the first user's username. Razorflame 19:53, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Update: All accounts but Pantomime102 have been blocked by various administrators. Razorflame 20:01, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Pantomime102 is not the same IP as Urmum201; I do not find the other users for a CU. --Eptalon (talk) 20
15, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Eptalon, can you block the IP address for Urmom201 please? Razorflame 20:16, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I cannot block the IP atm; there is one account connecting from there that shows no sign of abuse. --Eptalon (talk) 20:19, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

King Meatpuppet

Not only similar name but a similar edit. --Bärliner 15:40, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Abusive Mpuppet is not part of the group, but the other three are the same.-- Creol(talk) 15:50, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:ChristianMan16 and User:Freddy

I would like to request a checkuser for these two users. Razorflame 23:57, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you need one on me?--✞ChistianMan16✞ 23:59, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I would support this. ChristianMan16, your account does look fairly similar to User:Freddy if you look at the style of writing and the articles edited. I also received several emails from Freddy today, threatening to expose me for the lowlife scum I am :) Archer7 - talk 00:17, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I added Monnitewars (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) to the list. en:User:Monnitewars is blocked as a sock of this user, so the Monnitewars here is probably a sock too. Lights (talk) § 00:25, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes it's a sock i was gonna switch to that username but changed my mind..Go ahead and block that one.--✞ChistianMan16✞ 00:28, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This log shows that ChristianMan16 went through some attempted name changes. However, I'm not seeing that the MonniteWars account has been used abusively here, given that both were not active at the same time, nor were they involved in votestacking, etc. Yes, ChristianMan16/HornetMan16, etc has been involved in some pretty dreadful behaviour on enwiki, however his record seems to be reasonably clean here - Alison ❤ 01:57, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Users ChristianMan16 and Monnitewars are indeed the same, but no signs of abuse. Freddy has no connection (unless he moved cross country several months ago) -- Creol(talk) 03:06, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I told ya'll this a;ready.--✞ChistianMan16✞ 03:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Monnitewars is not being used abusively, so I see not reason to block that account. Oysterguitarist 04:59, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Monnitewars blocked, as reequested by creator---Bärliner 12:40, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Simpleashley

Ashley was a name used a lot by the Kimberly Ashton series of sockpuppets, and I seem to remember that some of the KA socks liked Audrey Hepburn as well (might be wrong on that one). Although the EN account it links to is well established, I think it might be an idea just to check after the horrible mess that we had before, the username and page really seem to match to me. The network KA always used was Comcast in the Everett, Washington area. Archer7 - talk 22:00, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Probably not Kimberley Ashton, IPs are totally different. --Eptalon (talk) 22:38, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kimmy (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))

I think that this is also a possible KA sockpuppet. Confirmation please? Razorflame 18:05, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shadelade and 75.63.192.37

I just blocked 75.63.192.37 for one week (see its contribs to know why). They included an edit on the talk page of a newly created account User talk:Shadelade. I want this account to be checked against the IP to see if belongs to the same vandal; also all other such accounts should be identified and blocked. - Huji reply 12:24, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - Nothing in common. Also, no accounts associated with the IP. -- Creol(talk) 12:44, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jackjack and 74.86.0.130

Posted same kind of stuff as Jackjack would. I need confirmation on this. Razorflame 20:00, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - not related-- Creol(talk) 01:19, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Drama queen

This newbie account looks similar to an Ashton Kimberly sockpuppet. --§ Snake311 (T + C) 08:11, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Checkuser data is available for like 3-4 months; I don't have any KA IPs, and therefore cannot tell you whether this is or is ont KA. A checkUser showed nothing we did not already know. And please put new requests at the top of the list. --Eptalon (talk) 09:55, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bobneilbruce and 88.251.54.218

Both seem to be the same person who keeps on vandalising Bono. I need confirmation of this first. Razorflame 20:44, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done They are indeed. --Eptalon (talk) 20:54, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Meatpuppet

IP vandalism from static ? IP immediately followed by account creation and same vandalism phrase from the named accounts --Bärliner 16:07, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done These latter two are indeed from the address given; Please note that the address also features one more user account (Which has not vandalised so far). --Eptalon (talk) 16:20, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
IP blocked 24 hours, vandalism. Names are unacceptable and are blocked indef.--Bärliner 16:22, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

please run checkuser again, this seems to be the same users as the others. Oysterguitarist 23:07, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Same network; but not same user. --Eptalon (talk) 23:10, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Juan "Encyclopedist" Bracey

Multiple vandalism from user account including same page and same day (Google) as ip which often vandalises--Bärliner 15:23, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - The IP is from a school with a history of vandalism. The IP wasn't on the list, so the page never got tagged as such. No connection to the vandal (although it is very similar to the Italian vandal)-- Creol(talk) 15:35, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Juan "Encyclopedist" Bracey (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log)) is 100% Angry Italian Dude (talk · contribs)..The so-called Johnny the Vandal..you don't need a CU to figure that out...--Cometstyles 15:39, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Their editing patterns may show similarities; their IP addresses do not, however. AFAICT these two are different. --Eptalon (talk) 16:30, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Iamandrewrice

Ban evasion — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barliner (talk • contribs)

I have blocked IP address 89.241.182.161 for 48 hours because he identified to being Ben. --Gwib -(talk)- 23:10, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Still needs confirmation. Razorflame 23:11, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done: All the IPs are definantly IamARs. "Ben is back" is not his although it does have distinct similarity to another vandalism issue (can't say more at this time). -- Creol(talk) 03:05, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New request. I think that this is another of his ban evasion IP's. Please confirm. Razorflame 21:30, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No need, obvious socks, blocked. Oysterguitarist 21:40, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Same provider, but no edit history yet; never used by him. --Eptalon (talk) 21:43, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Angry Italian Dude

These user have been harassing current admins and I would like to know if they are the same user and if there are anymore accounts. Oysterguitarist 15:25, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Angry Italian Dude was banned on the test wiki for being a JtV sock. Razorflame 15:47, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Could be a cross-wiki vandal, Cometstyles might know more about that. Oysterguitarist 15:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
He is a cross-wiki vandal. He's a John the Vandal sock. Razorflame 15:54, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I blocked The It4lian V4ndal on the test wiki. He is a JtV sock. Razorflame 15:55, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done The obvious three are related, but seem to be using a large dynamic ISP. The two IPs have no visible connection. -- Creol(talk) 16:08, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ionas or Ashton Kimberly?

Iamandrewrice (talk · contribs)

The newbie user has been acting quite odd lately, and I think that he may be a sock from Ionas, Ashton Kimberly, or someone else. I know he's already banned from en wiki, but just to be sure that s/he's not a sock. --§ Snake311 (T + C) 20:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Iamandrewrice, if you are reading this, please' do not respond to this. Razorflame 20:26, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done No sign of either/any problems of that nature. -- Creol(talk) 20:41, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Iamandrewrice and IuseRosary

Iamandrewrice (talk · contribs) IuseRosary (talk · contribs)

Just a precaution. As per Jeffpw's concerns, I think this warrants a checkuser. Razorflame 21:19, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Iamandrewrice was already given a checkuser. --§ Snake311 (T + C) 21:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I want to know if these two accounts are related to each other. Razorflame 21:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done The accounts are on seperate IPs. IuseRosary matches one of the IP ranges listed under the en: CU as part of the problems. A full check of the IP range showed multiple acts of vandalism (8 vandalisms over 3 pages on 4 seperate days) and no non-vandalizing contributions (with the exception of those today by Rosary). -- Creol(talk) 21:28, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to add another username to this. This username is acting suspiciously like Ben. Could you please check?

Alan Liefting (talk · contribs)

Razorflame 22:56, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Done They are definitely not the same. There are several IP ranges involved, which do not overlap. --Eptalon (talk) 23:13, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
WHAT?!!!!!!!!! NOT ONLY DO YOU ACCUSE ME OF SOCKPUPPETING IUSEROSARY... BUT NOW, YOU TELL ME IM PROBABLY SOCKPUPPETING THAT GUY AS WELL?????? OMG YOU ACTUALLY HAVE NO TRUST. I FEEL COMPLETELY HURT BY YOUR LACK OF IT, AND NOW UNDERSTAND THAT YOU DON'T TAKE ME SERIOUSLY AS A PERSON OR A USER! OH... AND BY THE WAY, NOT THAT I AM SOCKPUPPETING, BUT IF I WAS, YOUR CHECKUSER WON'T BE ANY HELP ANYWAY, AS THE ORIGINAL CHECKUSER ON ENWIKIPEDIA IDENTIFIED DOZENS OF ACCOUNTS WHICH HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH ME AS ME... AND MY IP ADDRESS CHANGES ALL THE TIME, SO THE ACCOUNTS WHICH ARE ME WOULD NOT BE ASSOCIATED... JUST... WHATEVER, I CAN'T BELIEVE YOU DON'T EVEN GIVE ME AN OUNCE OF TRUST Ben(Talk).(Changes) 09:58, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AND WHAT?????? I JUST CHECKED THE GUY'S CONTRIBUTIONS... HOW ON EARTH DO HIS CONTRIBUTIONS RESEMBLE ANYTHING LIKE ME????? Ben(Talk).(Changes) 10:13, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As a computer science and psychology junkie, I've noted you're presenting the stereotypes of someone worried presumably about being found out. I've encountered things like this before, and your reaction is way to strong. There is a way to prove some things to us, but we're not just going to tell you how to act like you're innocent (to a degree). Cypher (talk) 00:54, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Archive2&oldid=9914771"