Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser
CheckUser is the process of checking information about two or more users (including named users and IP addresses). Some administrators are able to check if two or more accounts have been used from the same computer. These users also see User agents. This can help them decide if two accounts are related in the way described above. It is also possible to see if a user is editing from an open proxy.
On this page, users can request some users or IPs to be checked. Good reasons should be given for why a checkuser is needed; you should provide links which show the questionable edits, etc. Questions should usually be created so that they can be answered by yes or no. Responses will be short in order to comply with Wikipedia privacy policy. Sensitive information (like the IP addresses used by an account) are usually not reported. The results are not always clear, and a decision should not be made only on the basis of checkuser results.
Use of the tool
This tool is to be used to fight vandalism, to check for sockpuppet abuse, and to limit disruption of the project. It must be used only to prevent damage to the project.
The tool should not be used for political control; to apply pressure on editors; or as a threat against another editor in a content dispute. There must be a valid reason to check a user. Note that alternative accounts are not forbidden, so long as they are not used in violation of the policies (for example, to vote more than once or to make it look like more people support an idea). Checkusers will refuse a request, if the reason for checking is not good enough to warrant the use of the tool.
Please see the CheckUser policy for all the rules related to CheckUser.
The list of users with CheckUser access can be seen at: Special:ListUsers/checkuser.
![]() |
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 3 days and sections whose most recent comment is older than 90 days. For the archive overview, see Archive.
|
Current requests
[change source]Start a new request |
New request
[change source]- Sarcastic kshatriya (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
- HistorianAlferedo (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
HistorianAlferedo is a sock or I have doubt.? Account was created after Sarcastic was blocked. These are some proofs that will help in CU.
1. Thakur he restored same content was added by Sarcastic kshatriya and his sock.[1][2][3]
2. Kshatriya he edited main lead and similar to previous socks.[4][5][6]
3. Blanking article that was vandalised by Sarcastic.[7][8]
4. Editing Porus that was created by Sarcastic kshatriya.[9] Bensebgli (talk) 20:45, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- Not confirmed fr33kman 22:58, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Emily Galaviz users
[change source]- Ldya124 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
- Lspa234 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
On 15 March, Ldya124 created Emily Galaviz, On the 15th it was nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2025/Emily Galaviz and on the 16th Lspa234 commented on the RFD[10], Since then it's been quiet until today when Ldya124 recreates the Emily Galaviz article [11]
Obvious socking is obvious, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 22:26, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- And after writing this, they've jumped back on the Lspa account and are removing the QD template[12], Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 22:34, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- They match, and have been bloved, in accordance with regulations... Eptalon (talk) 19:41, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
New request
[change source]- Corotenìa (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
- Breath1Fire (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
- FireBreathMan (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
- Syxrt6333 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
- Bokak99 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
- Servet6363 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
- Rapta999 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
Similar writing style and behavioural pattern, featuring aggressive edit warring in related articles that happens in spates. The suspected sock master appears to be continuing the same behaviour with the top account, and feigning ignorance when being reminded of the rules. Steven1991 (talk) 23:07, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- Blocked a few more socks fr33kman 23:03, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Users at ALLI TALESI
[change source]- SelfieDona (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
- InezaYose (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · SUL · CA · checkuser (log))
Please note that the 1st user is the author of the article, and the 2nd user removed RFD tag from there (special:diff/10172730). MathXplore (talk) 23:26, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- Both users matched, so there is another round of free blocks for everone. Eptalon (talk) 19:33, 7 April 2025 (UTC)