Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Trunzep

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a permissions request that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

• Result: Unsuccessful. Chenzw  Talk  14:13, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Trunzep

Trunzep (talk • changes • count • logs • page moves • block log • email)

End date: 13:07, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Ladies and Gentlemen, editors of all ages and to all hello. I am pleased to nominate myself as an adminstrative aspirant. I have stayed in this project long enough to familiarize myself with the routine and work done here. I have fought vandalism (although I've made a few mistakes here and there) but I've resolved them from the correction I've received from my senior editors (eg. Chenzw, Macdonald- Ross, Auntof6, Peterdownunder etc......). I am online very very often (even at 3am). I also have good and simple grammar of which am going to use to any editor who has any query. I also have experience from other wikis and for that I am an Admin of The Swahili Wikitonary (verify). I'll make more positive changes in the project n' we'll be far. For any complaint feel free to tell me n' i'll perfect it as no man is perfect. Thank you and shukran!

Candidate's acceptance:

Oppose

• Oppose - I don't think you have had sufficient experience on this wiki yet, and it is probably not a good idea to nominate yourself in an RFA shortly after a declined request for rollback. Also, your sysop status on sw_wikt is given only on a temporary basis, and I am not liking the attitude that you had with the stewards in your request on meta. Chenzw  Talk  23:53, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
• Oppose because of the issues mentioned in the response to your rollback request and because of other issues discussed on your talk page (specifically those at the sections called "Please don't change user pages of other users", "Quick deletion", and "Warning levels"). Those are things that a user should be able to manage correctly before being considered for rights. --Auntof6 (talk) 10:56, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
• Oppose - Firstly, Trunzep has only been here for 6 months and has made less than 500 edits, which is not enough to be considered an experienced member of the community (admins have often been here for years and contributed thousands of quality edits). Secondly, most of those edits have been reverting vandalism, which while helpful, is not the sort of editing that the community looks for when deciding on who would make the better administrator(s). Finally, the user looks like a hat collector to me (esp. coming so soon after the rollback request), and therefore might not be trustworthy as an admin, at least not yet. J991 20:11, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

• Oppose you lack experience, are you often present on WP:VIP, WP:AN, QD? no that's not a appropiate time to give you the tools Apipo1907 (talk) 20:22, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.