Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Rahmatgee
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a permissions request that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
Closed as unsuccessful per WP:SNOW and WP:NOTNOW. (Non-crat closure). Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 14:54, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Rahmatgee
[change source]| RfA of Rahmatgee |
|---|
| Previous RfAs: 1 2 |
| global contribs · pie chart · edit count · list user · blocklog ·contribs · deleted |
| Last comment by: ShakespeareFan00. |
End date: 09:53, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
I have time to spend on internet. The best utilization to me is the contribution on the grand information resource - Wikipedia. So i offer my services for the purpose. It will be my goodness if i get selected as Administrator.
Self-omination Candidate's acceptance:
Support
[change source]Oppose
[change source]- Oppose. Your only changes here are to create this request for adminship page. You can contribute to Wikipedia without being an administrator. How about doing some regular editor work for a while so we can get to know you? --Auntof6 (talk) 10:09, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Two changes locally, 206 globally. The user screwed up this application with their second edit here making it 1/2 an RfA for User:Example (who is banned with 5 edits).. It was never added to the RfP page in the first place (likely because the user account is too new to edit semi-protected pages. Snow it and lets move on. --Creol(talk) 10:20, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Should we actually be voting on it then, if the user did not add it to the page? I notice it was added by a third party. Kennedy (talk) 12:39, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- No. SNOW it, quickly. Kennedy (talk) 12:13, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- NO. A spectacularly inappropriate request. Macdonald-ross (talk) 12:28, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[change source]- Some time ago, the community spent time, and came up with a page listing certain things, new candidates should have. If I look at your edit count, it stands at 2. I therefore invite you to contribute here as a normal editor, and come back with the request in 3-6 months, when you have more contributions. --Eptalon (talk) 10:09, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.