Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Copyneat
Appearance
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a permissions request that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
- Closed per WP:SNOW. For more information about editing articles and contributing to the wiki, please take a look at the resources here. Chenzw Talk 17:28, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Copyneat
[change source]RfA of Copyneat |
---|
global contribs · pie chart · edit count · list user · blocklog ·contribs · deleted |
Last comment by: ShakespeareFan00. |
End date: 15:06, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
I am a freelance writer. I use Wikipedia a lot and love learning new things from it. I see a lot of posts that aren't well written or researched and I'd like to straighten it all out when I stumble across them.
Further, I'd like to take care of all the Wiki pages of my clients and create pages for those who don't yet have them.
You can check out my page here: (Redacted) You can see who I am here: (Redacted)
Candidate's acceptance:'self-nomination'
Support
[change source]Oppose
[change source]Strong oppose The account was created just half an hour ago and the first edit is on this page. Please check Wikipedia:Criteria for adminship before requesting.--Saroj Uprety (talk) 15:20, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I have tagged this for G11 as an RfA is not a place to post you LinkedIn page and website to promote yourself. This is very much a WP:SNOW request. --IWI (talk) 15:38, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose per WP:SNOW. Users only edits here are on this request. Questionable reason for even being here, never mind the fact that one doesn't need to be an admin to do what user says they want to do. I'm also declining the QD request: let's just handle this by closing the request as soon as a crat sees fit to do so. --Auntof6 (talk) 16:03, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose per Auntof6, I would think that it is okay for admins to close in such clear-cut cases but I'll defer to Auntof6's desire to wait for a crat --DannyS712 (talk) 17:24, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
[change source]- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.