Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2016 March 8

< March 7	March 9 >

March 8

File:Narasimha.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BethNaught (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:02, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Narasimha.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Unlikely to be own work by the uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 00:05, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Frankie J. Alvarez (cropped).jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BethNaught (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:02, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frankie J. Alvarez (cropped).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This is listed as cc-by-nc on Flickr. Stefan2 (talk) 00:16, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Khurshid Ali Khan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BethNaught (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:02, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Khurshid Ali Khan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Prior publication on Facebook here, no evidence of self-work or permission. Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 05:09, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Egyptian, Libyan airstrikes on ISIS targets in Libya after terrorists behead 21 Copts.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BethNaught (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:02, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Egyptian, Libyan airstrikes on ISIS targets in Libya after terrorists behead 21 Copts.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

Self-work claim appears bogus. The image on the left is taken from here. No evidence the uploader took the other images. Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 06:57, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:EAF Air Bases.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:10, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:EAF Air Bases.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Prior publication here. No evidence of self-work. Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 06:59, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Egyptian Mirage 5SDE 1970s.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:10, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Egyptian Mirage 5SDE 1970s.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

No evidence of publication date to verify PD claim. Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 07:01, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ahmed Mohammed Ali with Egyptian Thunderbolt Forces.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:10, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ahmed Mohammed Ali with Egyptian Thunderbolt Forces.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Versions of this file appear published online prior to the upload here (see this and other reverse Google results). No evidence of self-work. Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 07:06, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Egyptian Border Guard loge.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:10, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Egyptian Border Guard loge.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Insufficient explanation of how this is exempt from copyright. c:COM:CRT#Egypt doesn't indicate that government works in Egypt are necessarily exempt. Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 07:09, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This text has an exemption for Official Documents, but I am rather dubious that it would apply to logos as well.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:15, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Egyptian Silver Stars Loge.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BethNaught (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:02, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Egyptian Silver Stars Loge.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Wrong license. Clearly not self-work. No indication that the government work is automatically in the public domain in Egypt. Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 07:15, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Egyptian Thunderstorm Seal Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:10, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Egyptian Thunderstorm Seal Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Likely not self-work. Appears to be a government logo. No indication that Egyptian government works are automatically PD. Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 07:16, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Van Epperson in 2006.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Permission confirmed. (non-admin closure) Oiyarbepsy (talk) 02:02, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Van Epperson in 2006.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

No indication if uploader is creator Christopher Anderson. No EXIF. Deadstar (talk) 09:54, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I received the below message on my talk page. I will request user to send an email with permission to OTRS, have removed the puf template in favour of an otrs-pending one. Deadstar (talk) 09:22, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: In conversation with user - the email has since been sent. I have moved the file to commons. Deadstar (talk) 10:19, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am dealing with the OTRS ticket now and hope to have it resolved shortly. I don't think the file should have been copied to Commons while its copyright status is still unresolved and it is still listed here. -- Rrburke (talk) 12:34, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(followup). There's now a permission on file at OTRS ticket 2016030910021532. -- Rrburke (talk) 21:52, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Van Epperson Photo

I am not a computer person and do not understand the technical aspects of Wikipedia.

I am an actor named Van Epperson.

You have marked my personal photo/headshot on my Wikipedia listing for deletion, apparently because I listed the name of my friend who took it as the photographer. You have claimed it is does not show proper copyright permission for public distribution. This is my own personal photo. No one owns it but me and I have the right to list my friend's name who took the photo for me. I believe I put it up with full permission for anyone to use it -- and no one can do that but me -- I own the photo -- it is of me, taken with my own camera by my friend Christopher Anderson. It is a headshot I use professionally. It is all over the web on lots of different websites because I posted it myself. It is publicly displayed in multiple places for anyone to see and use.

If an actor cannot post his own photo that he owns without someone like you marking it for deletion over some made up incorrect assumption that has no basis whatsoever in truth or reality, that really sux.

Please remove whatever you have done to mark my photo of myself for deletion and allow it to remain on my Wikipedia listing. Yes, anyone can use it. It is a public photo. That is why I posted it. Again, it is a photo of ME, that was taken by my friend Christopher Anderson at my request. He is not a professional photographer, he is just my friend. He does not own the photo, I do. He has nothing whatsoever to do with it other than taking it for me, again, at MY REQUEST.

I am completely offended that you have marked my photo for deletion when it is a photo of me, taken at my request, posted on Wikipedia by me. If the permission/copyright needs amendment, I do NOT know how to do that. I attempted to understand the Wikipedia instructions connected to your unwarranted attacking of my photo by marking it for deletion but I did not comprehend them.

Again, please remove whatever you have done to mark my photo for "possible deletion". I would appreciate hearing back from you regarding this so I know my photo will not be removed over your unfounded assumptions. Please write me back on my page, so I will get the message like I got this one or I will never see it.Yeswolf (talk) 17:29, 8 March 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yeswolf (talk • contribs) 17:25, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Prof. Bimal N Patel.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted to Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2016_April_26#File:Prof._Bimal_N_Patel.jpg Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:26, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prof. Bimal N Patel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File has a watermark that reads "GNLU Digital Media". There is no verifiable proof that the uploaded is the same entity and/or the copyright holder of this image. Steel1943 (talk) 17:23, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This image has been uploaded by me and the copyright is held by me. I'm associated at the University and part of the digital media team. (Uncletomwood (talk) 19:00, 9 March 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Please provide evidence of this. See WP:IOWN. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:30, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Undercover Brothers Ug - 2014.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BethNaught (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:02, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Undercover Brothers Ug - 2014.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Author is claiming CC-BY as the license for this image, but it's source does not state that license. That, and as a non-free image, this image would fail WP:NFCC#1. Steel1943 (talk) 18:09, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jason Maek.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:10, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jason Maek.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Seems to be a userphoto on Youtube.[1] I can only find Youtube's thumbnail, but I assume that Youtube has a higher resolution copy somewhere. Stefan2 (talk) 22:40, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jean de Vallette monument-Piaza.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn. Steel1943 (talk) 03:59, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jean de Vallette monument-Piaza.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

Possible derivative work / freedom of panorama issue. The information for this statue's maker (specifically if they are deceased and when they died, if applicable) and when the statue was made would need to be known to ensure there are no copyright issues. Steel1943 (talk) 23:10, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per the article which this image is placed, Jean Parisot de Valette, this statue may have been dedicated in 2012, but I'm not seeing any references to truly validate this claim. Either way, a statue being made in 2012 is not old enough to not be eligible for copyright in any country, I believe. Steel1943 (talk) 23:13, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

According to Commons, in Malta FoP is OK for buildings and sculptures, so I don't think it should be an issue here. Re the date, this source makes it clear that it was unveiled in November 2012. Xwejnusgozo (talk) 00:40, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:St Paul's Islands, farmhouse before it became ruin, model at the National history museum.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn. Steel1943 (talk) 03:59, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:St Paul's Islands, farmhouse before it became ruin, model at the National history museum.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Possible derivative work / freedom of panorama issue. (This is a work of art inside of a building.) The information for this statue's maker (specifically if they are deceased and when they died, if applicable) and when the statue was made would need to be known to ensure there are no copyright issues. Steel1943 (talk) 23:17, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:To Commons.svg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Deleted and salted. MER-C 12:09, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:To Commons.svg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The people on this picture are carrying four pictures which are unsourced. Sources for those images need to be identified. Stefan2 (talk) 23:22, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The information is in the upload log of the original (commons) version of this file. Should be made more explicit in the Description block there (commons:File:To_Commons.svg) and also copied to here (en.wp clone of it). DMacks (talk) 08:38, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The copy on Commons has different photos, and the upload log on Commons only refers to the photos which are used on Commons. The photos which are used on Wikipedia are from an unknown source. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:37, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Inclined to delete and salt also because the Commons file is fully protected, rendering the local copy redundant as protection. If concerns remain, just reupload the Commons copy, but the local copy as is is iffy.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:19, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt if there's no reason to have this local copy at all, which is the easiest solution to disentangling different sites' images and licensing issues. DMacks (talk) 02:49, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt per nom. Steel1943 (talk) 18:25, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: While it is not immediately clear why the local copy has to have images that are different to the ones that are on the graphic in commons, I would observe that the images on this copy are not particularly clear and since they are incidental to the purpose of the graphic, I would say that de minimis non curat lex applies. --Elektrik Fanne 13:45, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Quick note See WP:VPT, thread "Deletion timeout on File:To Commons.svg". MER-C had technical problems with deleting the file, and while I deleted it, the deletion was just an attempt to get around the technical problem. The bot closed this PUF because I'd deleted it, but that's really not right; it shouldn't be closed until MER-C has made a decision or until it gets handled by someone else who acts on consensus here. Nyttend (talk) 20:20, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pro-life monument between Mosta and Naxxar Malta, Monument for the unborn child.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn. Steel1943 (talk) 03:59, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pro-life monument between Mosta and Naxxar Malta, Monument for the unborn child.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Possible derivative work / freedom of panorama issue. The information for this statue's maker (specifically if they are deceased and when they died, if applicable) and when the statue was made would need to be known to ensure there are no copyright issues. However, by looking at the image, this statue, this statue was probably made during or after 2006, making this statue far too young to not be eligible for copyright. Steel1943 (talk) 23:33, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

According to Commons, in Malta FoP is OK for buildings and sculptures, so I don't think it should be an issue here. Xwejnusgozo (talk) 00:40, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Small traditional Maltese windmill model at Monte Kristo Museum, Hal Farrug Luqa.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn. Steel1943 (talk) 03:59, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Small traditional Maltese windmill model at Monte Kristo Museum, Hal Farrug Luqa.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Possible derivative work / freedom of panorama issue. (This is a work of art inside of a building.) The information for this statue's maker (specifically if they are deceased and when they died, if applicable) and when the statue was made would need to be known to ensure there are no copyright issues. Steel1943 (talk) 23:34, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Statue of Saint George Preca at Montekristo Estates, Hal Farrug, Luqa.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn. Steel1943 (talk) 03:59, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Statue of Saint George Preca at Montekristo Estates, Hal Farrug, Luqa.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Possible derivative work / freedom of panorama issue. The information for this statue's maker (specifically if they are deceased and when they died, if applicable) and when the statue was made would need to be known to ensure there are no copyright issues. Steel1943 (talk) 23:35, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sprinkles.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BethNaught (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:02, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sprinkles.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

See c:COM:PACKAGING. Stefan2 (talk) 23:48, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wanderlust.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BethNaught (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:02, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wanderlust.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Original image at [2] as "The Oregon Coast". Claim of ownership by Wikipedia uploader is less than convincing. Amble (talk) 23:56, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why we are wasting our time on this. Speedy delete. It is up to the uploador to provide a reasonable claim of copyright ownership. The uploadors justification of: This is my picture, mine mine, all mine. It's on the internet for free. doesn't do it. Also, the web site (that is given above) has been created by someone (that according to his CV ) is very IT literate. The uploader here doesn't come over that way. Which ever-way, This is my picture, mine mine, all mine. It's on the internet for free. should not allow this or any other up-loader the free license, of not bothering to even make a half hearted effort to make copyright clear.- and thereby giving us the problem of sorting it out on their behalf. This up-loader is not a newbie and the website creator is IT lit. So, which every-way one looks at it, this image should be speeded.--Aspro (talk) 22:41, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're agreeing with my report... feel free to use the speedy deletion process if you prefer. --Amble (talk) 06:13, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.