Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Messiteca

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Speedily deleted by Anthony Bradbury per CSD U5. (non-admin closure) —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 23:38, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Messiteca

If I understand it correctly this is the career goals for Lionel Messi, with no encyclopedic future. [At the latter] we have Maradona's career, also with no encyclopedic purpose. Drmies (talk) 18:53, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies and Kelapstick: I've boldly merged these two due their similarity and near identical comments, please feel free to reverse my action if you find it disagreeable. — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 19:18, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seems reasonable. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 19:25, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I am on the verge of calling these U5 speedy deletable. While the user has amassed over 1200 edits, less than 10 have been outside userspace. I am sure the intention is to edit the stats and update them in the articles, but they don't belong in the articles, and they don't belong in userspace. Same comment for User:Messiteca. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 19:08, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, and ensure Messiteca understands that not being here can be grounds for blocking him. His 1200 edits with only five to maispace is not acceptable. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 19:41, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm working rigth now. Please, give me some time to read this new rule and reply to this later.
- Please give me some time to read everything and do not be taliban to make a decision or behave. I will answer on this subject in a few hours. Thanks for understanding
  - Yeah, sorry, I bit a little harder than I should have. My apologies. This discussion will be open for seven days, and you're not currently actually at risk of being blocked. I'm just trying to make it clear that we expect Wikipedia users to do things that benefit the encyclopedia, which it does not appear you currently are. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 20:07, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    - Well, this is not a new rule AT ALL, Messiteca, and throwing in a "taliban" reference is completely tasteless. Don't do that again. BTW we don't typically block for NOTHERE unless there's some kind of disruption or a clear abuse of Wikipedia. A handful of good-faith edits is all that it takes to sway me that such a block is unnecessary, but we can't have this kind of content. Drmies (talk) 20:51, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy deleted under CSD U5. ----Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:13, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.