Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Ge with dot above

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: redirect to Ge (Cyrillic). WP:SRE was applied. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ge with dot above.(non-admin closure)Alalch E. 22:10, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ge with dot above (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Unsourced draft without notability established in AfD. Content appears to be fabricated. 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 19:16, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, A letter matching this description doesn't appear in any of the listed languages meaning this is a hoax, probably could be G3, but here its still a deletion. -Samoht27 (talk) 20:12, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The nominator's asserts this is a hoax but provides no evidence. If the nominator thinks this is a hoax, then their bigger concern should be the unreferenced merge which resulted from the AfD rather than an abandoned draft that was halfway to being WP:G13 deleted (and which could've been WP:G3'd if it is indeed a hoax). Otherwise, drafts are not checked for notability; that it was merged at AfD has no bearing on draftspace (unless it is tendentious, of course), as there have been more than a few instances of a topic being deleted at AfD, improved in draftspace, and then successfully run through WP:DRV. Curbon7 (talk) 21:11, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.