Jump to content

Wikipedia:Meetup/Seattle2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wikipedia Meetups
   January 2026 +/-
Philadelphia WikiSalon (online) January 10, 2026 (2026-01-10)
London 224 January 11, 2026 (2026-01-11)
Chicago Wikipedia Day 2026 January 17, 2026 (2026-01-17)
San Diego 130 January 17, 2026 (2026-01-17)
Seattle Wikipedia Day 2026 January 17, 2026 (2026-01-17)
Oxford 118 January 18, 2026 (2026-01-18)
Manila Wikipedia Day 2026 January 18, 2026 (2026-01-18)
Toronto Wikipedia Day 2026 January 18, 2026 (2026-01-18)
Minnesota Wikipedia Day 2026 January 18, 2026 (2026-01-18)
Cardiff 6 January 22, 2026 (2026-01-22)
Bay Area Wikipedia Day 2026 January 24, 2026 (2026-01-24)
Wikipedia Day NYC 2026 January 25, 2026 (2026-01-25)
Brixton 13 January 29, 2026 (2026-01-29)
   February 2026 +/-
US Mountain West online February 10, 2026 (2026-02-10)
Minnesota online February 10, 2026 (2026-02-10)
Philadelphia WikiSalon (online) February 14, 2026 (2026-02-14)
Full Meetup Calendar • Events calendar on Meta
For meetups in other languages, see the list on Meta

The 2nd Seattle meetup occurred Saturday, January 15, 2005 Seattle Central Library. It was not as large as the November meetup, but that was anticipated: we had trouble finding a day this month that was open for even this many, and we didn't really have an out-of-town contingent this time.

In attendance were:

< I suspect that list isn't complete, please feel free to add yourself as appropriate; there were some comings & goings -- Jmabel | Talk 22:08, Jan 16, 2005 (UTC) >

Topics of conversation included:

  • Wikipedia Signpost, Wikipedia's new internal newspaper, started by Michael Snow.
  • SeattleWiki, started by Matiasp; check out http://www.seattlewiki.org.
  • Possible contact with small, local history museums; Dan Keshet and Jmabel have followed up to the point of drafting Wikipedia:Museum projects, but as of mid-February 2005 there has been no active outreach.
  • Whether some (maybe 1%?) of articles are either sufficiently controversial or sufficient "vandal magnets" that our normal, open way of free-for-all editing may just not work for these; suggestion of starting dialogue on alternatives. Jmabel will probably try to start discussion on this.
  • Larry Sanger's recent criticisms of Wikipedia, and the issues of elitism/anti-elitism
  • Michael Snow pointed out that there is very little in Wikipedia on performers of previous generations, unless their work was in a medium where it would be preserved. For example, our coverage of classical composers is at least semi-decent, but performers of classical music from before the present generation, and especially from before recording, are very under-covered. Even more so for dancers, stage actors, etc.
  • ... and we pretty much all seemed to think Seattle, Washington is ready to be a featured article (which it soon was).