Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2025 May 28

May 28

File:The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari poster.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:08, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to c:File:Das Cabinet des Dr. Caligari.JPG. This was previously deleted on Commons based on c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Das Cabinet des Dr. Caligari poster.jpg, which confused Austrian artist Fritz Bernhard with a Swiss artist of the same name. This same mistake was added to enwiki's copy a few years ago. We should replace this with the Commons version and delete the local copy again. hinnk (talk) 00:46, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Buffs (talk) 20:34, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chatham Waterfront Aerial Hollaway Studio.webp

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:08, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Existing place, no free equivalent online is not a valid fair use rationale as this can still be recreated. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 06:06, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

While it’s true that in theory an image like this could be recreated, the existing CGI was produced by the rights holder with specific architectural detail and emphasis that would be difficult to replicate freely without infringing on their copyright.

Furthermore, the image is a precise, accurate representation of the redevelopment as designed and approved, making it a unique informational resource.

No freely licensed alternative currently exists that provides this exact aerial perspective, level of detail, and authorized design depiction.

Given these points, the image meets WP:NFCC criteria for non-free use as it is necessary for illustrating the article accurately and cannot reasonably be replaced with free content. Sunolafjagtenben-hur (talk) 07:45, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the layout and features as designed can be expressed in text or freely made diagrams. Fails WP:NFCC#1. -- Whpq (talk) 14:02, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unlike what the nominator claimed, this is not an existing place, but a computer generated image of what it will look like eventually (as depicted in 2019). However, this is speculation. Unless that expansion is the subject of significant commentary, it fails our NFCC. It certainly should not be the lead image in the article. Buffs (talk) 20:34, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Carcross Desert Sign.JPG

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2025 June 6. ✗plicit 00:22, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carcross Desert Sign.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.