Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2025 March 21

March 21

File:SOUR Target Edition cover.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:37, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFCC 3&8. estar8806 (talk) ★ 00:36, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Renaissance LP Cover Art.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ✗plicit 14:19, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFCC estar8806 (talk) ★ 03:22, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep. Per WP:NFCC, any non-free cover must be justified by critical commentary and it's omission must harm the topic at hand. All over the article and in the infobox itself, there is substantive critical commentary, which includes substantive discussion about the imagery used and it's importance to the topic of the article. The nominator should review WP:NFCC throughly and ensure that any nomination to delete a non-free image has a proper explanation of what specific bit of the NFCC policy is in breach. Simply saying "delete because of NFCC" is not an adequate argument.

>> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 17:50, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:NFCC #3a Minimal number of items. Multiple items of non-free content are not used if one item can convey equivalent significant information. The standard cover conveys all the information needed. estar8806 (talk) ★ 17:09, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STV logo 2014.svg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. ✗plicit 14:20, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Logo of STV, not in public domain, not copyright-free Vestrian24Bio 07:20, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Nomination made by a blocked user Mvcg66b3r (talk) 20:23, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This appears to be below the TOO and so PD in the US. I can see it being borderline in the UK though, so the current tags marking it PD in the US and possibly non-free in the UK seem correct. Thryduulf (talk) 15:36, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --112.207.123.170^{'Talk to me!} 04:41, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Kept as is This is how the logo described that. This is below US TOO while questionable for the UK one. 103.111.102.118 (talk) 12:16, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STV Player 2019.svg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: convert to {{PD-ineligible-USonly}} ✗plicit 14:22, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Logo of STV Player, not in public domain, not copyright-free Vestrian24Bio 07:20, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Nomination made by a blocked user Mvcg66b3r (talk) 20:23, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep but change to PD-US Only. The only way this differs from the STV logo above is the addition of the word "Player" which is very obviously not copyright eligible, making the whole thing below the TOO in the US but borderline in the UK. It's also worth noting that contra the nomination statement this isn't presently being claimed as PD or otherwise free of copyright. Thryduulf (talk) 15:39, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relicensed as PD-Ineligible-USOnly per Thryduulf. For this image, the claim of "fair-use" is flawed, due to fact that whole design of the logo below TOO and copyright ineligible in the US. Additionally, this nomination was done by a 72-hour blocked user. 103.111.102.118 (talk) 03:06, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ryan Borgwardt in 2024.jpeg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Guy is alive and not in prison, there is no non-free rationale here. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:58, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Blatant violation of WP:NFCC and Foundation:Resolution:Licensing policy. This person is most emphatically alive (despite his attempts to make it seem he died). We make no special exemptions to WP:NFCC for people who are in prison (and he's not even convicted yet; and is out on bail). While free license imagery might not exist right now, this clearly fails the "or could be created" portion of WP:NFCC #1. --Hammersoft (talk) 01:15, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On occasion, stuff like Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2023_August_18#File:Lucy_Letby_mugshot.png happens. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:53, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In basically every FfD I have seen photos of people who have life in prison without parole are usually voted as keep for the same reason as a dead person would be. And sometimes people with lesser sentences (e.g. Chauvin) for reasons that evade me. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:33, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting example. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 07:53, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I used that as an example because I nominated it for deletion because his term is short enough that he will probably get out of jail alive - and yet they voted keep. PARAKANYAA (talk) 19:32, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete alive and not imprisoned. No theoretical reason he could not be photographed. PARAKANYAA (talk) 07:58, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Hammersoft and PARAKANYAA--112.207.123.170^{'Talk to me!} 04:42, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NM PBS logo.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate of c:File:NMPBS 2019 logo.png Mvcg66b3r (talk) 20:19, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. 103.111.102.118 (talk) 12:17, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete & redirect. Buffs (talk) 20:31, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:36, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.