Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2025 June 22

June 22

File:English whisky GI (front page).jpeg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedy keep withdrawn. House Blaster (talk • he/they) 14:46, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence that this image has been released under the OGL; the link provided is only a copy of the OGL. See the source, which contains no indication of licensing information. I'd be happy to be proven wrong, but this seems non-free. It certainly is not CC BY-SA 4.0, as claimed. ~~Delete as a copyvio~~. House Blaster (talk • he/they) 14:05, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

At the bottom of the page on the English whisky GI it says that all content is released under Crown Copyright unless stated otherwise, please see the link below.ChefBear01 (talk) 14:36, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.gov.uk/protected-food-drink-names/english-whisky-slash-english-whiskey

“All content is available under the Open Government Licence v3.0, except where otherwise stated”ChefBear01 (talk) 14:36, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ChefBear01: Thank you for including the original source; I now support relicensing to OGL v3 (the current tag says OGL v1.0) and moving to Commons so others can make use of the image. Happy to withdraw with that outcome. Best, House Blaster (talk • he/they) 14:40, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@HouseBlaster thank you I am glad this could easily and quickly be resolved. ChefBear01 (talk) ChefBear01 (talk) 14:46, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Astran.JPG

The CC BY-SA 4.0/GFDL attribution requirements of the article in the image cannot be met because the article was deleted, and there don't seem to be any surviving archives of the its history log – the Wayback Machine has an archive of the article here that seems to match the revision shown in the image, but there doesn't seem to be a corresponding archive of its page history.

The image was originally being used with a non-free media use rationale before someone removed it (probably in error), but I don't think the image meets WP:NFCC; the image's original use rationale said it was to give a concrete example in Reliability of Wikipedia, and that it wasn't replaceable because the depicted article was deleted, but this could easily be replaced with something from WP:HOAXLIST with a surviving history log. {{Lemondoge|Talk|Contributions}} 18:30, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A potential solution would be to ask an admin on frwiki for a list of contributors and then add that to the file page. If someone wants to do that, I'd support keeping. Otherwise, yeah this should be deleted if we can't meet the terms of the license, since there are alternatives like Alan Mcilwraith which have their history intact. hinnk (talk) 11:38, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prof-Dr-Ram Chander Sihag.pdf

No license; unused; wrong file format; I have no idea who on Earth this is supposed to depict. Duckmather (talk) 18:37, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Image of Adil Mukhi.jpg

Unused personal file. Out of scope. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 23:54, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

License has been updated Adilm0 (talk) 00:03, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dr. Interested Picture.png

Unused personal file. Out of scope. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 23:54, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

License has been updated Adilm0 (talk) 00:00, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]