Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2025 July 4

July 4

File:André Filipe Teixeira da Silva.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. ✗plicit 14:13, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFCC#1. The subject died today and there is no evidence that obtaining free options were attempted or that they could exist (CC) Tbhotch^™ 04:55, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Tbhotch At the time of his death, there was no image of the subject on Wikimedia Commons. reason why this was uploaded with the deceased licensing tag until an image is available on Commons. Afro 📢Talk! 05:06, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That is not how it works. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 05:10, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't mean one could not ever be found. Anyone who has been to a match where Silva played and taken a photograph of him could upload a freely licenced image of him. Thus, still fails WP:NFCC#1 as an image could be created- and no effort has been made for this. "Commons doesn't have an image" isn't sufficient. So I support delete. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:35, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for the same reasons as Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 August 28#File:Juan izquierdo en cndef.jpg and Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2025 April 11#File:Nelsy Cruz.png. hinnk (talk) 13:54, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep NFCC1 states "no free equivalent is available, or could be created", so if there's no free files of a deceased available on commons or locally, a fair use file of them can be uploaded until someone licenses the photos they took with a free license. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 11:32, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I still stand by my comment as there is no image of the subject on Wikimedia Commons. That's the reason why this was uploaded with the deceased licensing tag until an image is available on Commons. Afro 📢Talk! 22:36, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep With the precedent that there is apparently no possibility ever of a free image of Juan Izquierdo, who played for Uruguay's biggest club and whose final match was viewed by 60,000 people, there can't be a free image of someone who played in the Portuguese second division. It sounds rushed, but precedents are precedents. Unknown Temptation (talk) 18:24, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ThompsonVenables.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ✗plicit 23:41, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFC#UUI, criterion 1: Pictures of people still alive, would serve the same encyclopedic purpose as the non-free image. However, mugshots would not be used for limited sentencing (while living). Absolutiva 01:58, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This is not being used for any identification reasons, but as a unique historical photograph. The publication of their mugshots and the publication of their identities was a historic, specific event that is discussed in the article. Any new free photo would not satisfy the context, because they would no longer be children, so it would not capture what this is used for. It is not replacable. The entire notability of this case is about children murdering children. Seeing this specific notorious photo greatly improves one's understanding of what the public saw and felt. PARAKANYAA (talk) 11:55, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:33, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep one of the most notorious crimes in British history, and the specific photo of the child perpetrators has been shared on countless news articles and documentaries. It truly is a historic photo and the page would be all the poorer without it. We're not exactly going to find and make photographs of two people with protected new identities, and whatever they look like would not match the effect of seeing two primary-aged children in a mugshot. Unknown Temptation (talk) 18:17, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lady Gaga - John Wayne.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is now the third time a user is uploading this image. As I've written before, this is not a "cover art for John Wayne", it's merely a screenshot from the video, used solely on one page of Lady Gaga's website, exactly because the song does not have a cover art. Should be deleted (once again...). Sricsi (talk) 16:06, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It would be nice of you to use "" to prevent this situation, and maybe you are violating WP:PERSONAL. Plus, her official website indicates it as a single, zero reason to be list as "song". Camilasdandelions (talk!) 16:15, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly which part of my remark was a "personal attack" per WP:PERSONAL? I am merely commenting on the uploaded image, which has been now uploaded/deleted several times, and is not a cover of an audio recording. Sricsi (talk) 16:20, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nomination. livelikemusic (TALK!) 16:49, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination. Οἶδα (talk) 16:37, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Beyoncé - Video Phone (feat. Lady Gaga).png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the official cover art for "Video Phone"—it's merely a screenshot from the music video, used only on a single page of Lady Gaga's website. Even if it were an actual single cover, it would still fail to meet WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8. Should be deleted. Sricsi (talk) 16:11, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nomination, plus, per WP:NFCC#8, its inclusion does not significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. livelikemusic (TALK!) 16:51, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination. Οἶδα (talk) 16:37, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lady Gaga - 911.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The same image has already been uploaded before by another user. This is not a cover art for a single, it's merely a screenshot from the video, used solely on one page of Lady Gaga's website, exactly because the song does not have a cover art. Should be deleted. Sricsi (talk) 16:13, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nomination. livelikemusic (TALK!) 16:52, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination. Οἶδα (talk) 16:37, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.