Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2025 July 20

July 20

File:Ali Daei in action.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

looks like a professionally taken shot, no EXIF, user has history of copyvios. likely not own work. —Matrix(!) _{ping one}^{when replying} {u - t? - _uselessc} 12:16, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:VogueAdriaSummer2025.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure this qualifies as fair use, it seems more of a promotional image for the subject than strictly informational about the magazine, which is the reasoning behind the {{Non-free magazine cover}} template. ... discospinster _talk 15:39, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

delete. The subject of the article is a living person – it's longstanding consensus that images of living people almost never meet WP:NFCC per WP:FREER. There's no particular reason we have to use the Vogue cover to illustrate this article. Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 09:58, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Thorpe Park logo.png

This logo seems to be made of simple text/shapes. I don't think it meets any threshold of originality. Thanks, 1isall (talk/contribs) 16:51, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This logo is likely above the UK's very low threshold of originality. It should probably be relicensed to {{PD-ineligible-USonly|the United Kingdom}}. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:35, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I wonder how it meets the UK's threshold of originality, or ToO. (If it does.) Thanks, 1isall (talk/contribs) 00:00, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
See c:Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United Kingdom#Threshold of originality for examples. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:25, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that. I guess we can just relicense the file now? Thanks, 1isall (talk/contribs) 00:14, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Ixfd64: The UK's TOO has increased after the introduction of the new test by the supreme court, see the examples on Commons. I think as a simple typeface this wouldn't even have a copyright in the UK per the new standard, so Move to Commons —Matrix(!) _{ping one}^{when replying} {u - t? - _uselessc} 06:13, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:ABC TV 2001.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also:

The 3D effects are likely above the threshold of originality even in the United States. We typically don't keep non-free former logos unless there is significant commentary about them. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:22, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ABC News 24 logo.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We typically don't keep non-free former logos unless there is significant commentary about them. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:30, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.