Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2025 January 8

January 8

File:Bendera Sultan Terengganu.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Pppery (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:14, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong license. The image looks like an insignia and hence the uploader might not be the copyright holder. Sreejith K (talk) 04:58, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Spitalternatecover.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ✗plicit 14:25, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The file is the old album cover of Spit, in which File:Spitalbumcover.jpg (the current version) is already used as the visual representation. The file therefore violates WP:NFCC#3a, and should be deleted. 廣九直通車 (talk) 09:34, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's the original album cover before it got reissued, so I think it can be kept on the page. I don't see why it shouldn't be kept. Statik N (talk) 05:18, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has strict criteria for fair use images. See WP:NFCC Traumnovelle (talk) 07:07, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NFCC#3a. Stifle (talk) 13:57, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As the cover of the original version of the album, this should be the main image in the infobox, per Template:Infobox album#cover. File:Spitalbumcover.jpg should be kept as an alternate cover, since it's significantly different from the original and has largely replaced it. hinnk (talk) 06:35, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- If the alternative cover has largely replaced the original cover, then I will change my position as neutral. This will be determined by the closing admin.廣九直通車 (talk) 04:54, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Antichrist Superstar Alternate Cover.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:53, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The file is an alternate album cover of Antichrist Superstar, in which File:Marilyn Manson - Antichrist Superstar.png is already used as the visual representation (also cf. #File:Spitalternatecover.jpg). The file therefore violates WP:NFCC#3a, and should be deleted. 廣九直通車 (talk) 09:40, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Many CDs use this album cover, so I think it should be shown. Statik N (talk) 05:19, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Staind - Tormented (back cover).jpeg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Pppery (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:14, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The file is the back album cover of Tormented, in which File:Staind Tormented.jpg is already used as the visual representation. As correctly stated in Tormented (Staind_album)#Artwork, the album artwork is graphic, which is duly depicted with File:Staind Tormented.jpg, and the nominated file only serves as an additional replacement. The file therefore violates WP:NFCC#3a, and should be deleted. 廣九直通車 (talk) 09:46, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

~I don't see why it should be deleted. It does show more of the artwork and how the song titles are written. Removing it is unnecessary. Statik N (talk) 05:18, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The discussion of the back cover is limited to a description of the text style, cited to some kind of filing from a court case (???). The image doesn't meet WP:NFCC#8. hinnk (talk) 06:27, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- I still don't see how showing what it looks like is so bad. At least people will be able to see it. Statik N (talk) 19:16, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CESC Limited Logo.svg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:49, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Poor vectorization. WP:NFCC#5 & 6 as MOS:IMAGEQUALITY — Ирука¹³ 11:28, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not following the rationale for deletion here - this seems like a standard {{non-free logo}} to me. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:24, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I do not see a valid reason for deletion listed here. It's the company's logo. It's low resolution in order to meet FUR. Buffs (talk) 16:43, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Its encyclopedic as a logo being used on a article and non free logos are allowed and also meets all other WP:FUC requirements and a poor vectorization is not usually valid reason for deletion and its required to be low resolution as per WP:FUR Is la🏳️‍⚧ 11:39, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Seal of New Orleans, Louisiana.svg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:12, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Should be removed from New Orleans as one of several fair use images. Fails NFCC#3a and #8. Stifle (talk) 15:20, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Where has it failed these, please? Thanks. - TheLionHasSeen (talk) 17:10, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A seal used in the infobox for the city's article is acceptable fair use. Aspects (talk) 00:00, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. - TheLionHasSeen (talk)
TheLionHasSeen (talk) 22:57, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Napier tank.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fails the unreplaceable criteria. The specific NZLAV used in the siege is not required understanding and I've replaced the image in the article with a free version of an NZLAV. Traumnovelle (talk) 21:07, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.