Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2025 February 9
February 9
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2025 February 17. ✗plicit 00:26, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- File:Luke Skywalker in Return of the Jedi and The Last Jedi.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- File:Darth Vader.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by NeoBatfreak (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Replaceable with c:File:Darth Vader - 2007 Disney Weekends.jpg per WP:NFCC#1. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 03:45, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- File:Imagine Dragons - Follow You Cutthroat.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Lk95 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Currently used in Cutthroat (song) and Follow You (Imagine Dragons song), I can't help wonder whether the double single cover art is needed to help readers understand both songs. If not, then by default it may not be contextually significant after all. The articles have their own single cover arts individually identifying the songs. If that's the case, then this image may be, by amount, excessive. George Ho (talk) 23:46, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: I doubt the inclusion of the dual-single cover will significantly enhance a visitor's understanding, and its exclusion would not be detrimental. livelikemusic (TALK!) 01:33, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- File:I'm Taking Off (Germany cover).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sk8erock~enwiki (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
De-PRODding rationale was this: appears to pass our criteria for alt covers: significant market, very different image
. Nonetheless, is the German cover necessary? If not, then by default it may not be contextually significant. Furthermore, by amount, the image may be excessive as it doesn't differentiate from the other (standard) cover art. George Ho (talk) 23:51, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.