Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2025 February 17

February 17

File:Luke Skywalker in Return of the Jedi and The Last Jedi.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:07, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable with c:File:Luke Skywalker - Welcome Banner (Cropped).jpg per WP:NFCC#1. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 03:41, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - There is no free images of Luke from the Star Wars sequel trilogy. (Oinkers42) (talk) 15:36, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel that an image of Luke Skywalker from the sequel trilogy should be featured in the article, please consider adding a still of him with sufficient commentary (WP:NFCC#8) to the sequel trilogy section. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 03:57, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:26, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Thought about this one for a while.This image exists and can be used. While it doesn't show the much older character, that's not an exception for NFCC. I sympathize with the point of view, but until NFCC is relaxed, this image needs to be deleted. Even if it wasn't deleted, we should replace the top image with the free one. Buffs (talk) 18:11, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Someday - Glass Tiger.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:07, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

De-PRODding rationale was this: would appear to be the primary cover art for the release. Nonetheless, being the top cover art isn't an excuse for concerns about exceeding minimal number of NFC files needed and its contextual significance to Someday (Glass Tiger song). From what I learned, the band is Canadian, and the Canadian releases use the same alternative cover art (discogs) instead of this nominated one. George Ho (talk) 00:37, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pick one & delete the other I have no preference. Buffs (talk) 16:11, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ShaggyRogers.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. ✗plicit 13:35, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable with c:File:Shaggy MultiVersus.png per WP:NFCC#1. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 00:48, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The current 2D image is the most common style used for the character, from the original series and numerous other incarnations. This would make it the ideal image to represent the character as a whole. Grapesoda22 (talk) 02:49, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:12, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep clearly the character in question + notable enough to have his own article. A computer generated 3D remake isn't even close to the same. Buffs (talk) 15:20, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.