Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2025 February 19

February 19

File:1928–29 Illinois Fighting Illini men's basketball team.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This file looks like it would have been published in the 1929 edition of the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign yearbook. I think the hidden version can be undeleted and moved to Commons. Brought to FfD rather than requests for undeletion because a review thinks there is no evidence of publication before 1930. Abzeronow (talk) 03:04, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep & mark as PD I think it's pretty clear that it's a yearbook photo. Even if it was a standalone photo, it was clearly first published in 1929 in the US and that's clearly PD. AAAAAAAND even if it was 1930+, I see no evidence in copyright records of such a photo or yearbook registered & maintained as required. It's PD. Buffs (talk) 16:09, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as is. No evidence of publication before 1930. No evidence that the photo was published after without copyright notice. — Ирука¹³ 05:49, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Evidence of publication?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:24, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As stated before, this was very likely a yearbook photo. Lo and behold, that's exactly what it was. Clearly published before 1930. Buffs (talk) 16:28, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
None of the Illio Yearbooks were published with a copyright prior to at least 1937 according to the US Copyright Office records. Buffs (talk) 17:06, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JoJo-Too Little Too Late (2018).ogg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:04, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lacking in any commentary in the prose of Too Little Too Late (doesn't appear to be mentioned at all in the article aside from the caption on the file placement), and is placed right below an excerpt of the same portion of the song from the original recording. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 04:36, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's not clear why a clip from the 2018 version of the song is needed in the article. This doesn't seem to meet WP:NFCC#8. Indeed, 2018 appears nowhere in the article, except the references. - tucoxn\^talk 15:05, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree w/ Nom. I see no need to include it. Buffs (talk) 16:56, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bradley Cooper - Maybe It's Time.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:04, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Don’t know what the uploader means by “official covert art”. This is an image from the album’s/movie’s promotional rollout, but it was not used as a cover for that song anywhere. Should be deleted. Sricsi (talk) 12:35, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom Buffs (talk) 16:56, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Kirtap92 (talk) 19:12, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Logo of Oxford Reference.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:06, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced by public domain SVG logo at Oxforf Reference ―Howard • 🌽³³ 19:25, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Correction: Oxford Reference ―Howard • 🌽³³ 19:26, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Superceded. Uncontroversial. Buffs (talk) 16:30, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No need for non-free image. Tenpop421 (talk) 16:44, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.